Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 83,096
- 62,015
But that goes to my other point I posted earlier in the thread and got crucified for it. Why the hell should Matthews be crucified for taking his value as being the best goal scorer in the league when other superstars take below their value as a superstar? It goes down to the point I made earlier, hockey players are just stupid when it comes to their own self worth and structuring their contracts. McDavid if he could go back probably would have taken a 5 year deal instead of an 8. But I think it’s completely unreasonable to expect Matthews to take less than McDavid based on a contract that was signed 6 years ago. It’s not Matthews fault they aren’t expiring around the same time.
I’m personally not crucifying him, I think the deal is fine.
My issue is trying to draw general principles from Connor McDavid because it’s a wildly unflattering comparison to Matthews. You are setting up the argument for success when you go there.