Good sentiment, but even this undersells things.IMO yes, as long as you don't give him too big of a role.
He had a rough year in Vancouver in 2022/23, I think it was fair to call him a liability there, but then had a good season with Florida in 2023/24 in a reduced role, where he was certainly a positive contributor. In Florida he was the 5D (5th in TOI/GP in both the regular season and playoffs, behind Montour, Forsling, Ekblad and Mikkola), while in Vancouver he was the 4D, behind Hughes, Hronek and Myers. Fewer minutes and easier minutes in Florida, for sure.
In Vancouver he was really the #1. Hronek wasn't there yet, and Hughes had Schenn as a baby-sitter, and while he wasn't sheltered per se, he got more offensive usage and less matchup time. OEL faced heavy matchup usage, with Myers as his primary partner, Bear his second. He got hurt at the WC's, and came to training camp cleared to play but having missed the whole offseason, with lingering mobility issues from the foot/ankle. Not surprisingly- he fell flat on his face and had an awful year.
Last year he was Florida's 5- but;
A-he was clearly the guy driving the bottom pair when he was there
B-spent significant time in a matchup role with Forsling, and some more in a mid pair role with Montour
His season averaged out to good/great results in midpair usage
In my mind, expectations are for year 1 are:
1. Complete Collapse - 10%
2. 5D that can drive bottom pair and do spot duty in top 4 (45%)
3. 4D that can make a solid middle pairing as McCabe's equal (40%)
4. 2-3D that drives an awesome middle pairing, better than McCabe, option to pair with Tanev to free Rielly from Matchup minutes (5%)
I like the risk reward. Any year at level 3 or 4 is a massive, massive win on the cap, level 2 is par.
This signing is so much better than Klingberg- very different players in very different situations