OVO16
#WeTheNorth
- Apr 16, 2017
- 10,756
- 10,861
Leafs defense mainly is soft. The playoffs are gonna be a different animal in terms of forechecking and opposition players trying to wear down our defenders with body checks.
I have to say... It's impressive how you just give us hints as to what the future holds and don't reveal all the answers. Such incredible restraint. We are so fortunate to have you and your guidance on this board. Otherwise we would have such wasteful topics... But luckily you have definitive answers and enter threads to explain to us that this is not the answer and guide us in the right direction. Maybe we can just allow you to create all the threads? That way only worthwhile conversations would be had. Most importantly less of your mighties precious time would be wasted.This guy gets it.
Some of you others, not so much.
Kiss off it’s that exact thinking that forms losers.Ah yes more false narratives that Leafs haven't won a round because they aren't physical enough. Do we really need a thread every week about something that isn't true?
I'm torn with it.
On one side you can easily see the Leafs are an easily intimidated team. Whenever their opponent ramps up the physicality, the Leafs cower. I can never forget JT's first game back on the Island. The Isles made it abundantly clear from the start they were bringing a playoff like intensity but the whole team just resigned to losing from the first couple minutes in. Games like that have been a recurring trend with this core.
On the other side: there seems to be this ridiculous bias that the league and refs take against the Leafs whenever they do decide to step up and respond physically. Kadri took 2 suspensions against Boston in the playoffs when he didn't even make the dirtiest plays of those respective games, Matthews gets some bullshit suspension for retaliating with a crosscheck when he was clearly getting hacked to start, and the series against Tampa last year resulted in Clifford taking an immediate match penalty and suspension (along with Simmonds) and they weren't even brought back the rest of the series because Keefe probably knew the refs were going to have a hair trigger with calling anything against them as the series went on.
I honestly might just be some biased homer regarding the 2nd point - but I constantly look at the shit that other teams get away with and can't believe it. I really wonder if Dubas is aware of this and takes into consideration that the Leafs are under a different set of rules then other teams.
Leafs defense mainly is soft. The playoffs are gonna be a different animal in terms of forechecking and opposition players trying to wear down our defenders with body checks.
Ah yes more false narratives that Leafs haven't won a round because they aren't physical enough. Do we really need a thread every week about something that isn't true?
Go get a physical big D come playoff time with no Muzzin its going to become a big issue when ref's put whistles away. Secondly top 6 and bottom 6 additions of size and ability to play. Hopefully Knies fills one of those spots
I agree with IPS about the conundrum the Leafs seem to be stuck in when it comes to physicality. I’ve noticed that when a team plays physically against us and we try to play “disciplined”, by not responding to all the after the whistle crap, the refs don’t seem to want to reward us with handing out penalties to the other team.
If we respond and “push back”, then the refs get involved and either hand out penalties to both teams, or just to the retaliating team… which happens to be the Leafs.
A perfect example of this is any of the Leafs/Bruins series. It’s incredible how many things the Bruins got away with and yet we tried to stay disciplined, thinking that the Bruins would eventually start getting penalized.
That never happened, and when we tried to fight back, we started seeing our players going to the box, or getting suspended. If I’m a Leafs player, I have no idea how to play against a team like the Bruins in the playoffs.
Imo, I think we’d be best served by playing physical and feisty and not bother worrying about how the refs are going to deal with it. One way or the other, the penalties are going to be evened up, so we might as well go on the offensive. Just my two pennies.
Good points. I would also add that it seems that whenever we get a player that is supposed to be a high energy guy and a hitter...he seems to stop doing it very shortly after joining (or never in the case of Aube-Kubel) the team. Why is that? Why do players we acquire for their particular skills we don't have in abundance seem to just blend in with everyone else? I would assume it as you just stated...the main guys aren't playing mean or desperate...that trickles down to everyone...IMHO the issue is lack of physicality, and being soft -> YES
But I don't think getting any physical players is going to solve any issues.
Why?
When I look around the league especially the teams that have had success:
Their core guys actually play physical (or dirty sometimes); they are not boy scouts always looking at the refs. They can dish as much as they can take.
examples:
Tampa: Point, Kucherov, Stamkos, Hedman, Sargechev etc.
Avs: mack, Rantanen, Makar, Landy, etc.
Bruins: Bergeron (not dirty but finishes checks and takes hit to make plays); Marchand, Pasta, MacAvoy, Lindholm, etc.
Canes: Aho, Svechnikov, Pesce, Slavin, etc...
etc...
you get the point.
For the Leafs I only see Matthews mixing it a bit; everyone else plays like boyscouts (marner, nylnader, tavares). Its gotta come from within the core; core has gotta get more physical; getting someone else is not gonna help IMO
Also, opposition has way to easy of a time when they stand in front of Leafs goalies; when leafs do that they get punished/boxed out. In the playoffs thats also gonna make the difference
The Seattle Seahawks won that Super bowl by pushing the envelope regarding pass interference. They literally did it so often that they dared the officials to call every one and reduce the game to a slog...it worked...they got called for some...but most of the time they got away with it because the coach knew the refs would be made a focal point and would shy away from that.I'm torn with it.
On one side you can easily see the Leafs are an easily intimidated team. Whenever their opponent ramps up the physicality, the Leafs cower. I can never forget JT's first game back on the Island. The Isles made it abundantly clear from the start they were bringing a playoff like intensity but the whole team just resigned to losing from the first couple minutes in. Games like that have been a recurring trend with this core.
On the other side: there seems to be this ridiculous bias that the league and refs take against the Leafs whenever they do decide to step up and respond physically. Kadri took 2 suspensions against Boston in the playoffs when he didn't even make the dirtiest plays of those respective games, Matthews gets some bullshit suspension for retaliating with a crosscheck when he was clearly getting hacked to start, and the series against Tampa last year resulted in Clifford taking an immediate match penalty and suspension (along with Simmonds) and they weren't even brought back the rest of the series because Keefe probably knew the refs were going to have a hair trigger with calling anything against them as the series went on.
I honestly might just be some biased homer regarding the 2nd point - but I constantly look at the shit that other teams get away with and can't believe it. I really wonder if Dubas is aware of this and takes into consideration that the Leafs are under a different set of rules then other teams.
I think it’s most likely a system thing and players coming in don’t see a system focused on physicality. That doesn’t mean they won’t throw hits but they are probably more focused to play within the system than go hunting for hits.Good points. I would also add that it seems that whenever we get a player that is supposed to be a high energy guy and a hitter...he seems to stop doing it very shortly after joining (or never in the case of Aube-Kubel) the team. Why is that? Why do players we acquire for their particular skills we don't have in abundance seem to just blend in with everyone else? I would assume it as you just stated...the main guys aren't playing mean or desperate...that trickles down to everyone...
So if you are a high energy player who played on physical teams and you come here...for some reason you see the others not giving a shit about the physical game and just go with the flow....it happens all the time.
He literally avoids contact as much as Kessel did....think about that. The guy is 6-5 and 220 and he stick checks guys or does flybys. What I don't get is the "We would like Pierre to be more physical and remind him of it" ....WTF is that? Remind him? Why not tell him he better have at least 2 hits per game or he sits? This comes from the top somewhere and I am betting it's Shanny and not Dubas.It’s not only that but our leafs forwards do absolutely nothing on the forecheck the other way. It’s fly bys, stick in the skates to poke the puck. Matthews has the ability to be a wrecking ball, we saw it last playoffs, he needs to bring that every time.
Pierre Engvall would be the first guy I punt to the moon. That guy just doesn’t get it, if I watch him in disgust on the forecheck I know Keefe must be loosing his mind on a nightly basis.
That may be true...but we should look at changing the system if that is the case. If we bow out early this year for the 7th time...I think this system will be proven to be a regular season system.I think it’s most likely a system thing and players coming in don’t see a system focused on physicality. That doesn’t mean they won’t throw hits but they are probably more focused to play within the system than go hunting for hits.
This is why I think under Dubas and Maybe Keefe we will never get that physicality. Clearly Parros has a bias towards the leafs, whether he’ll admit it or not. But he holds the Orr situation against them. It’s been proven multiple times. There’s no consistency between DPOS decisions. It’s all arbitrary.
Clearly the message from Management has been to not engage because it is going to hurt us (suspensions, our guys getting the extra penalty) rather than help us. Unfortunately though I think this is the wrong message. IMO the messaging should be, f***/screw the NHL we are gonna be physical and engage in scrums and if we get punished so be it, but more teams will think twice about messing with us. That should have been the response, not disengaging. Unfortunate, but I don’t think the mindset changes with the team unless it changes up top with management.
We got Lyb last year and he was absolutely awful. Trust your younger players. The best teams who play their best hockey in right moments are who win regardless if they play physically or not. Colorado isn't a physical team. They play fast with talent throughout their lineup when healthy.
What the Leafs need is an addition or two up front. If they are physical great, but thats not the primary objective.
Leafs outhit a great team in Boston yesterday and lost.
Incorrect.
How many times this season have the Leafs outhit the other team in a game? I'm guessing they've out hit the other team 25%-33% of the time. There's quite a few things wrong with that. You take abuse all season long. The wear and tear of the season has to affect you. But most obviously it's better to initiate than retaliate. When a player like Engvall who is softer than Charmin is on your third line. I don't see that line outplaying the other team in the playoffs. Everyone here loves hockey. You have to realize the game will always change post season. It's more physical. Especially on the third and fourth lines. Dubas needs two wingers who can keep up and hit. Put them with Kampf on the third line. Use whoever you like on the fourth line ( hopefully not Simmonds). Tampa really improved when their third line really improved. Wash. Rinse. Repeat Dubas.
That is a very generous guess. My guess is they have only outhit the other team in 5-10% of the games.How many times this season have the Leafs outhit the other team in a game? I'm guessing they've out hit the other team 25%-33% of the time..
That's the thing though. When your whole team buys into it and play rough/tough/dirty, and the guys who can't at least facewash/slash/cross check, the refs are not going to call everyone and everything. It's your identity. Refs respect that.I'm torn with it.
On one side you can easily see the Leafs are an easily intimidated team. Whenever their opponent ramps up the physicality, the Leafs cower. I can never forget JT's first game back on the Island. The Isles made it abundantly clear from the start they were bringing a playoff like intensity but the whole team just resigned to losing from the first couple minutes in. Games like that have been a recurring trend with this core.
On the other side: there seems to be this ridiculous bias that the league and refs take against the Leafs whenever they do decide to step up and respond physically. Kadri took 2 suspensions against Boston in the playoffs when he didn't even make the dirtiest plays of those respective games, Matthews gets some bullshit suspension for retaliating with a crosscheck when he was clearly getting hacked to start, and the series against Tampa last year resulted in Clifford taking an immediate match penalty and suspension (along with Simmonds) and they weren't even brought back the rest of the series because Keefe probably knew the refs were going to have a hair trigger with calling anything against them as the series went on.
I honestly might just be some biased homer regarding the 2nd point - but I constantly look at the shit that other teams get away with and can't believe it. I really wonder if Dubas is aware of this and takes into consideration that the Leafs are under a different set of rules then other teams.
Look at Game 1 last year against Tampa when Clifford got a 5:00 major, a game misconduct, and a 1 game suspension for his boarding penalty.That's the thing though. When your whole team buys into it and play rough/tough/dirty, and the guys who can't at least facewash/slash/cross check, the refs are not going to call everyone and everything. It's your identity. Refs respect that.
In 2013, when we played Boston with Orr, McLaren, Fraser, Komarov, Kadri, Phaneuf and O'Byrne, I believe we had more PP opportunities than Boston in the series. If not, it was very close.
Nowadays, we plug in Simmonds or Clifford and it's pointless. The refs know if they can get rid of either/both of them, the Leafs will play a passive game and there won't be any headaches for the refs.
Either the whole team man's up, or we should just forget about it.
No point in it only being 1 or 2 guys.
Look at Game 1 last year against Tampa when Clifford got a 5:00 major, a game misconduct, and a 1 game suspension for his boarding penalty.
How many times this season have the Leafs outhit the other team in a game? I'm guessing they've out hit the other team 25%-33% of the time. There's quite a few things wrong with that. You take abuse all season long. The wear and tear of the season has to affect you. But most obviously it's better to initiate than retaliate. When a player like Engvall who is softer than Charmin is on your third line. I don't see that line outplaying the other team in the playoffs. Everyone here loves hockey. You have to realize the game will always change post season. It's more physical. Especially on the third and fourth lines. Dubas needs two wingers who can keep up and hit. Put them with Kampf on the third line. Use whoever you like on the fourth line ( hopefully not Simmonds). Tampa really improved when their third line really improved. Wash. Rinse. Repeat Dubas.