LastOne2100
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2017
- 8,367
- 9,189
And give it to who exactly? 34? The guy who was completely invisible? 16? Another ghost.
No one for now.
And give it to who exactly? 34? The guy who was completely invisible? 16? Another ghost.
So you have no clue about your players then since they've been media trained?No I don’t, I’ve mentioned this before numerous times. I’m a former pro athlete myself (not hockey, another sport) but I thoroughly enjoy hockey. So I’ve been in locker rooms, done media training, done pressers. I now coach at a high level And half the shit people say on here couldn’t be farther off. Most people haven’t got a damn clue LOL, so enjoy guessing/pretending like you do from your couch baud.
Leafs lost 7-3 game 1 against Tampa last year. I still have hope.
Keefe lookes defeated in his post-game. Slouched over, quiet, talking to the floor.
No matter how feel internally, as a leader you need to display strength.
Dubas hires lol...
Keefe is so bad, I'd consider firing him today for Boucher. Boucher used to have some fire.
I strongly disagree, and I think most people with eyes and hockey knowledge would as well.They had three scoring chances. Legit scoring chances, not the artificial crap.
Boucher is on the bench firing our PP into the groundKeefe lookes defeated in his post-game. Slouched over, quiet, talking to the floor.
No matter how feel internally, as a leader you need to display strength.
Dubas hires lol...
Keefe is so bad, I'd consider firing him today for Boucher. Boucher used to have some fire.
Nice smart ass...
So explain how over the past 8 years the Leafs constantly lead in expected goals but end up losing.
How much of a sample size do you need?
I knew that internet conspiracy theorists believed Boston intentionally fell in the standings in order to play the Leafs in the first round.
I didn't believe it at first but...
Babs contract was what..2 years in of 7?Might get a new coach and even that is iffy since they just extended him a few months ago.
So?We had more expected goals nearly the whole game. The third period just made it much more lopsided for us.
Look at this chart:
View attachment 856410
Put Woll in and never go back. I'd give him a long leash and roll the dice there.One game means very little. We’ve all been here before
Stay the course, the boys got this.
Need to figure out the goaltending and stay out of the box
I strongly disagree, and I think most people with eyes and hockey knowledge would as well.
But elaborate - if the Leafs had 3 "legit" scoring chances, how many did Boston have? Is every goal that goes in a result of a legit chance?
That's a fair take . . . don't totally agree, but Sammy could have been much better, D as well . . .but we also should have / could have put a half dozen pucks in the net too.The problem is the other team will always get breaks with Samsonov in net
First shot - they score. Like the 5th time in the last 10 games the first shot goes in?
Samsonov' last 3 games
Tonight: .826
Against Detroit: .844
Against NJ: .700
Well, good for them. Now they can get destroyed by them in round two instead of round one. Or lose to Tampa in five again,
The thing that pisses me off is that they are not that good. It's just the Leafs being idiots and doing it to themselves.
WHen I shook the opposing teams coaches hand...his joy was the only win I needed -Keefe.Keefe will be consulting the family on how to feel about this game...
I was shocked how bad the Leafs looked.Well, good for them. Now they can get destroyed by them in round two instead of round one. Or lose to Tampa in five again,
The thing that pisses me off is that they are not that good. It's just the Leafs being idiots and doing it to themselves.
Might as well. Sammy isn't coming back after this season anyway.Put Woll in and never go back. I'd give him a long leash and roll the dice there.
Put Woll in and never go back. I'd give him a long leash and roll the dice there.
Who cares? See what he can do with the reins. Anything is better than Keefe.Boucher is on the bench firing our PP into the ground
Much more effective when variables are so controlled.I’m not a big fan of pretend stats in hockey, they seem to work well for baseball, but they don’t really seem to mean the same thing in hockey