Depends on how much money Toronto can take on honestly. The Ducks will probably want to move someone like Stoner with Fowler and bring in a winger. But the Leafs still have to finish with the Cowen situation and figure out what their LTIR situation looks like with guys like Robidas, Horton, and possibly Cowen. I would actually think that Bozak might be appealing to Anaheim just because of his contract structure but he'd have to move to wing for it to work and obviously Fowler and Stoner for Bozak would need a pretty enticing plus to go with it.
Eklund Rumor: Leafs in on Cam Fowler
- Thread starter LEAFANFORLIFE23
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
dracom
Registered User
Nope. We just don't want him when the starting point is either Lindholm, Theo or Ritchie, which has been the only players Leafs fans seem to want in return for JVR.
Get ready for a bunch of those in this thread. I laughed as soon as I read Leafs in the title.
Kelly
Registered User
- Nov 12, 2012
- 14,912
- 7,513
Chances are that if you're going to make a play for Fowler, a team is going to have to take Stoner with him.
Pestilence
Registered User
Wanted to check Stoner's contract, but apparently you need more than "stoner cap" for Google to know what's up
Arthuros
Registered Snoozer
JVR is not the worst deal we could make.
It's also not the best deal.
Also Eklund. Site devs should really get working on making tags visible on mobile version.
It's also not the best deal.
Also Eklund. Site devs should really get working on making tags visible on mobile version.
Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 16,538
- 7,757
Could be for Marner, I'm hearing that after this week's WJC pre-tournament tournament Babcock really soured on Marner and doesn't think he'll be an NHL player anymore.
/sarcasm
/sarcasm
Zegs2sendhelp
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2012
- 44,217
- 41,976
likely has nothing to do with all the lilndholm for jvr trades.... jvr doesn't get you lindholm.
Fowler for jvr is workable.
Zegs2sendhelp
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2012
- 44,217
- 41,976
Arthuros
Registered Snoozer
Ducks fans generally like Tatar+. Just can't really settle on the + part of it, since some of us are willing to settle for Sheahan, but some also demand Athanasiou.
Finnish your Czech
J'aime Les offres hostiles
KaseMeOutside
Based
- Oct 18, 2011
- 44,320
- 10,281
i would rate their values relatively similar, but i would not trade a no.2 dman for JVR right now
Hey the Sabres last season had to take a contract back in david legwand to get lenher so why wouldn't the ducks send one back if the leafs are involved in fowler. I could see Fowler and Stoner for JVR + a 3rd pick in 2017
Kelly
Registered User
- Nov 12, 2012
- 14,912
- 7,513
Nobody cares, it's irrelevant.
I would agree, I basically said that out of spite because of the post I quoted. We had the same arguments with flyer fans in the JVR/Schenn proposals before the actual trade happened.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Well, if that's the case, then all the JVR talk ends. The rturn would need to be less if we are taking Stoner.
- Status
Latest posts
-
-
-
Recalled/Assigned: Lightning recall Gage Goncalves and Gabriel Fortier- Latest: LordStanlersCup
Ad
Upcoming events
-
CHAMPIONSHIP - Canada vs United States - TD Garden, BostonWagers: 9Staked: $32,955.00Event closes - 2 days from now- Updated: