SeaOfBlue
The Passion That Unites Us All
- Aug 1, 2013
- 35,591
- 16,776
Waiting for Godot ?
Perhaps, but it's better than making a bad move, especially when the Leafs already have Zaitsev.
Waiting for Godot ?
Point still sort of stands though.Are you serious ?
Quite a fallacy you've got there.
Hint: 4 seasons vs 1 season...
If the Leafs put anyone on LTIR, any bonuses paid this season would be deducted from next year's cap.
And they already have $2.533M in dead cap in 2017-18.
The stats show that Fowler is getting killed on the ice when playing the minutes that he does. He isn't an awful player but the numbers tell us that he is outmatched in the situations that he was played in. Boudreau obviously mismanaged his usage. He should be facing easier competition and that tells us that he isn't a top pairing defenseman.
Using team record to judge an individual is the kind of perfunctory analysis that leads to misleading conclusions.
Point still sort of stands though.
As opposed to the bulletproof "good team = good player".Right, listen to those hero charts, they never lie.
As opposed to the bulletproof "good team = good player".
Just curious, is the inverse of this also true? The Canucks are terrible defensively, therefore Chris Tanev is terrible defensively?
As opposed to the bulletproof "good team = good player".
Just curious, is the inverse of this also true? The Canucks are terrible defensively, therefore Chris Tanev is terrible defensively?
Like how contrary to what people say he actually plays with some of the highest CF% quality of teammates in the NHL? Or how his stats are often on the bottom of his own team which is very abnormal for top-pairing defensemen? Or how most stats indicate the Ducks play better then he is off the ice? Not everyone just looks at HERO charts, there is plenty of context for him, and if he was so good it shouldn't be this difficult to show people why.Or you can apply some context, which you refuse to do.
Or you can apply some context, which you refuse to do.
Nobody cares, it's irrelevant.
I would agree, I basically said that out of spite because of the post I quoted. We had the same arguments with flyer fans in the JVR/Schenn proposals before the actual trade happened.
If opponents of Cam Fowler applied any more context on these forums, they would be arrested for stalking him.
Like how contrary to what people say he actually plays with some of the highest CF% quality of teammates in the NHL? Or how his stats are often on the bottom of his own team which is very abnormal for top-pairing defensemen? Or how most stats indicate the Ducks play better then he is off the ice? Not everyone just looks at HERO charts, there is plenty of context for him, and if he was so good it shouldn't be this difficult to show people why.
If anything, Fowler is a better player when you apply no context. If you just look at his raw stats, they're not that bad.
But let's apply some context...
-He's the worst on an excellent possession team
-He makes every teammate he plays with worse
-He plays with some of the highest quality possession teammates in the league
With no context at all, you're looking at a 49% possession player. So what? Apply everything listed above and you're looking at something much worse.
I think Ducks fans are the ones who have interest in ignoring context.
1) its eklund
2) fowler has poor adv stats, dubas would never let the trade happen
How about
Fowler + 2nd
for
JvR + Kapanen
Wrong but ok i'll take a shot.If anything, Fowler is a better player when you apply no context. If you just look at his raw stats, they're not that bad.
But let's apply some context...
-He's the worst on an excellent possession team
-He makes every teammate he plays with worse
-He plays with some of the highest quality possession teammates in the league
With no context at all, you're looking at a 49% possession player. So what? Apply everything listed above and you're looking at something much worse.
I think Ducks fans are the ones who have interest in ignoring context.
That 8 mil in cap space would make this a lot easier since they could just keep what they have, sign their two RFA's, and move on even with two pretty glaring contracts in Bieksa and Stoner. And I shudder to think what the Ducks could be doing if they hadn't signed those contracts plus were a cap team. They really could've been a dominant force with all their cheap talent coming up and proving themselves like they have.
Or you can apply some context, which you refuse to do.