Eklund Rumor: Leafs in on Cam Fowler

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,625
15,325
Folsom
If the Leafs put anyone on LTIR, any bonuses paid this season would be deducted from next year's cap.

And they already have $2.533M in dead cap in 2017-18.

Right now, they're under the cap ceiling with a potential 3.7 million in bonuses mostly in Auston Matthews. To go with that, they have a shade over 20 million in expiring contracts of which likely none will be retained. If Matthews happens to collect a significant chunk of bonus money that the team doesn't pay off this season, they won't have a problem paying the rest of it off next season. I think that concern is very minor to say the least.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,279
10,204
The stats show that Fowler is getting killed on the ice when playing the minutes that he does. He isn't an awful player but the numbers tell us that he is outmatched in the situations that he was played in. Boudreau obviously mismanaged his usage. He should be facing easier competition and that tells us that he isn't a top pairing defenseman.

Using team record to judge an individual is the kind of perfunctory analysis that leads to misleading conclusions.

He isn't getting killed, you are reading the stats without any sort of context
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,279
10,204
Roman Josi is overrated, why? because corsi says so, let's not use any context even though virtually everyone agrees he's a top 10 dman in the league.

without context and using just a hero chart one could then claim josh manson is as good or better, but we know that's not true.
 

aufheben

#Norris4Fox
Jan 31, 2013
53,866
27,721
New Jersey
Right, listen to those hero charts, they never lie.
As opposed to the bulletproof "good team = good player".

Just curious, is the inverse of this also true? The Canucks are terrible defensively, therefore Chris Tanev is terrible defensively?
 

Static

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2006
49,417
37,775
SoCal
As opposed to the bulletproof "good team = good player".

Just curious, is the inverse of this also true? The Canucks are terrible defensively, therefore Chris Tanev is terrible defensively?

They are all just tools, use all of them instead of relying on one for your opinion. If you think Fowler is bad, then fine. If you think Fowler is bad because of what it says on a piece of paper, then you aren't doing it right. You might as well get in line.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,279
10,204
As opposed to the bulletproof "good team = good player".

Just curious, is the inverse of this also true? The Canucks are terrible defensively, therefore Chris Tanev is terrible defensively?

Or you can apply some context, which you refuse to do.
 

aufheben

#Norris4Fox
Jan 31, 2013
53,866
27,721
New Jersey
Or you can apply some context, which you refuse to do.
Like how contrary to what people say he actually plays with some of the highest CF% quality of teammates in the NHL? Or how his stats are often on the bottom of his own team which is very abnormal for top-pairing defensemen? Or how most stats indicate the Ducks play better then he is off the ice? Not everyone just looks at HERO charts, there is plenty of context for him, and if he was so good it shouldn't be this difficult to show people why.
 

Flair Hay

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2010
12,529
5,789
Winnipeg
Nobody cares, it's irrelevant.



I would agree, I basically said that out of spite because of the post I quoted. We had the same arguments with flyer fans in the JVR/Schenn proposals before the actual trade happened.

In all fairness the flyers fans that said it would be an atrocious trade were right
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
148,106
126,974
NYC
If anything, Fowler is a better player when you apply no context. If you just look at his raw stats, they're not that bad.

But let's apply some context...

-He's the worst on an excellent possession team

-He makes every teammate he plays with worse

-He plays with some of the highest quality possession teammates in the league

With no context at all, you're looking at a 49% possession player. So what? Apply everything listed above and you're looking at something much worse.

I think Ducks fans are the ones who have interest in ignoring context.
 

gorangers0525

Registered User
Dec 15, 2014
2,751
687
If opponents of Cam Fowler applied any more context on these forums, they would be arrested for stalking him.



He is pretty good on Tuesday night games against eastern conference teams that have a right handed 1C and a backup goalie in.
 

Michel Beauchamp

Canadiens' fan since 1958
Mar 17, 2008
23,299
3,393
Laval, Qc
Like how contrary to what people say he actually plays with some of the highest CF% quality of teammates in the NHL? Or how his stats are often on the bottom of his own team which is very abnormal for top-pairing defensemen? Or how most stats indicate the Ducks play better then he is off the ice? Not everyone just looks at HERO charts, there is plenty of context for him, and if he was so good it shouldn't be this difficult to show people why.

If anything, Fowler is a better player when you apply no context. If you just look at his raw stats, they're not that bad.

But let's apply some context...

-He's the worst on an excellent possession team

-He makes every teammate he plays with worse

-He plays with some of the highest quality possession teammates in the league

With no context at all, you're looking at a 49% possession player. So what? Apply everything listed above and you're looking at something much worse.

I think Ducks fans are the ones who have interest in ignoring context.

"And yet it moves..." as Galileo purportedly said in a different context (now, one should get a permit/licence to use that word on HF). ;)
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,535
16,116
1) its eklund
2) fowler has poor adv stats, dubas would never let the trade happen

Dubas can't stop that trade if it were to happen he isn't GM and it's CLEAR we aren't relying soley on advanced stats because if we were Polak wouldn't be here and Kadri would be making 6 million not 4.5
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,279
10,204
If anything, Fowler is a better player when you apply no context. If you just look at his raw stats, they're not that bad.

But let's apply some context...

-He's the worst on an excellent possession team

-He makes every teammate he plays with worse

-He plays with some of the highest quality possession teammates in the league

With no context at all, you're looking at a 49% possession player. So what? Apply everything listed above and you're looking at something much worse.

I think Ducks fans are the ones who have interest in ignoring context.
Wrong but ok i'll take a shot.

Kevin Bieksa was absolutely dreadful last year when he was playing Hampus Lindholm, but you know who he played his best hockey with? Cam Fowler. Now I know you are going to come up with some corsi stat, but remember Lindholm was among the elite in driving possession last year, so of course when Bieksa goes from him to Fowler it could go down, again this is CONTEXT which is what people like yourself and frankly many ranger fans who have a strange obsession with Fowler constantly fail to bring to the discussion.

Ben Lovejoy was a 7th defensemen before coming to the Ducks and playing on a pair with Cam Fowler.

Simon Despres, comes to Ducks and immediately plays his best hockey in a top 4 role, whos his partner?

You are basing everything on a couple metrics because you do not watch the ducks play it's ok to say you don't. When people counter your arguments with how well Fowler starts break outs you use a strawman argument as a counter point
 

Not So Mighty

Enjoy your freedom, you wintertimer.
Aug 2, 2010
2,971
1,004
Omicron Pesei 8
That 8 mil in cap space would make this a lot easier since they could just keep what they have, sign their two RFA's, and move on even with two pretty glaring contracts in Bieksa and Stoner. And I shudder to think what the Ducks could be doing if they hadn't signed those contracts plus were a cap team. They really could've been a dominant force with all their cheap talent coming up and proving themselves like they have.

Dear god that is painful to think about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad