34
Registered User
- Mar 26, 2010
- 22,135
- 10,027
Sounds about right.Dominated a team the Leafs considered to be an elite team, following it up with a bottom feeder.
About as much of a schedule d loss as you get.
Sounds about right.Dominated a team the Leafs considered to be an elite team, following it up with a bottom feeder.
About as much of a schedule d loss as you get.
gotta get the next 2 after that christmas week. Matty and Mitch due for outputs tonight. Play the giant. Clamp down defensively, 20 shots max, and get a couple pp goals. Then have a beer and rest.Winning 2 of 3 in California would be okay for me.
Hildeby.
I’d rather one American scored twiceTwo Swedes last night?
Two Americans tonight?
Scoring that is ...
OT loss last year was poor but we take this one by 3.Dominated a team the Leafs considered to be an elite team, following it up with a bottom feeder.
About as much of a schedule d loss as you get.
It would've been awesome if Montreal were too scared to do it in the '86 playoffs.Oh the terror of a rookie not being 100% NHL ready before he's ever stepped on the ice during a NHL game?
No, let's wait until he's proven himself a NHL player before putting him in the line-up.
![]()
I agree I just don't see a better option when the other option is an AHL rookie.
Or do you want to start the guy who is mentally broken?
The Leafs need to add a goalie but that hasn't happened yet.
Oh the terror of a rookie not being 100% NHL ready before he's ever stepped on the ice during a NHL game?
No, let's wait until he's proven himself a NHL player before putting him in the line-up.
![]()
Matthews should go off tonight.The Ducks are not starting Gibson they are putting in someone with Samsonov like numbers. I hope Matthews goes off.
View attachment 795308
Matthews should go off tonight.
An injured Jones is no good to us .Who starts in net? Go with Jones again? Need these points.
Dumb coach does more dumb coach things