Rumor: Leafs considering stripping John Tavares of captaincy (per Kypreos)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's great if we're trying not to hurt anybody's feelings but that's not the goal here. What's humiliating is Johnny's playoff performances.
Sure I totally agree that he’s been brutal in the playoffs and nobody knows that better than Johnny himself. That’s already humiliating enough. No need to take away his dignity too. Let him finish.
It also won’t look good on the Leafs and players around the league will remember.
 
Sure I totally agree that he’s been brutal in the playoffs and nobody knows that better than Johnny himself. That’s already humiliating enough. No need to take away his dignity too. Let him finish.
It also won’t look good on the Leafs and players around the league will remember.
I've been a 'players don't want employers that mistreat employees' advocate but I don't see this enveloped in that. Everyone recognizes the underperforming group. I don't think outside players would see leadership change as mistreatment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafGrief
Stop talking about it already and just do it.

We need to be ruthless in our pursuit of the cup.

If they believe they are better off with Matthew’s as Captain why wait?

Tavares is a big boy and if he resigning is dependent on him being captain then he’s clearly not a team guy
 
Stop talking about it already and just do it.

We need to be ruthless in our pursuit of the cup.

If they believe they are better off with Matthew’s as Captain why wait?

Tavares is a big boy and if he resigning is dependent on him being captain then he’s clearly not a team guy

Why would the Leafs care about re-signing him? They should let him go after this next season. Not even for 1M would I take him back.
 
Can't trade anyone... how can one make big changes?

Seems like the only way they can say they did something drastic.
I don’t put switching letters on jerseys beyond Leaf mgmt as to major changes, the bonus is it most likey increases jersey sales so Keith Pelley would be happy………
 
  • Like
Reactions: Antropovsky
I'd just wait another year. Maybe if Auston signed 8 years. The 4 year deal is not great, could have a very short lived captain
Good point, wonder how much more juice 34 can squeeze out of mgmt on his next deal because he’s captain? Guy signed for four years so he can either bolt or screw us over again, if he wanted to stay and be the leader of this team he would have signed for eight………
 
Good point, wonder how much more juice 34 can squeeze out of mgmt on his next deal because he’s captain? Guy signed for four years so he can either bolt or screw us over again, if he wanted to stay and be the leader of this team he would have signed for eight………
I said this at the time, but people were too busy celebrating the extension - it's a ridiculous deal. The entire value of a long-term deal is that the cap hit remains the same while the cap goes up, meaning that deal takes up less & less space every year, allowing you to build around it.

Having to continue handing out big deals every few years absolutely prevents you from doing any of that.

How many free agency conversations did the Leafs avoid on July 1st because they weren't comfortable going longer on term due to the Matthews "window"?

We know both Bertuzzi and Matt Roy were very close but the Leafs didn't like the term. Have to imagine that there were others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumman
It would be illogical to think being captain wouldn't make him feel more responsible for our teams success as captain.

giphy.gif
 
They would never strip him of it. They might ask politely but no chance of them taking it away not by his choice. I would let him play out the contract and see how it goes. Personally I thought Rielly should have been captain a long time ago. Matthews is also very deserving of course. But then, so is Tavares.
 
Why would the Leafs care about re-signing him? They should let him go after
He is still a serviceable player. I could see him pulling a Spezza and playing his later years as a bottom 6 player who an win puck battles, faceoffs and chip in 10-15 goals. No point throwing away a good asset if he is willing to take a lessor role at bottom 6 dollars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: notDatsyuk
Sure they are Kyper...whatever you say.

He's gone after this season when Shanny gets canned. Then they can just hand it to Matthews, who should have had it all along.
 
Rather surprised this doesn’t appear to be a discussion happening anywhere (unless I’ve missed it which is possible) but allegedly Kypreos said on radio on Monday that the Leafs are seriously considering taking the captaincy away from JT and naming Matthews captain.

If true, I mean, I get it. If this happens though I feel bad for Tavares. It’s not all his fault what’s transpired here under his leadership and this is an awful market to have something like this go down in as it will be talked about and analyzed to death and there will probably be some degree of undue character assassination that accompanies it.

That all said. This is clearly Auston Matthews’ team and I think he will be the captain sooner than later. Can this not wait a year though so as to not publicly embarrass Tavares?
This was all pretty much discussed between JT and Matty before he signed here .. da only issue was when it would occur .. representing it as a Leaf mgmt issue is da only thing that Kipper has wrong here .. of course Leafs would have to approve but again this was all discussed and agreed before JT signed here that there would be a transition to Matty at some point in time .. and Kipper already knew this too .. i guess he thinks he has to "break things" now .. i guess these media types need stories to fill time
 
This was all pretty much discussed between JT and Matty before he signed here .. da only issue was when it would occur .. representing it as a Leaf mgmt issue is da only thing that Kipper has wrong here .. of course Leafs would have to approve but again this was all discussed and agreed before JT signed here that there would be a transition to Matty at some point in time .. and Kipper already knew this too .. i guess he thinks he has to "break things" now .. i guess these media types need stories to fill time
So the video the showed when they named Tavares the Captain, with his wife and baby boy in a 91 Leaf jersey with a 'C' on it, was all acting since he knew he was getting the C all along?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JT AM da real deal
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad