Dayjobdave
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2010
- 3,407
- 1,860
Joe Bowen:
Sweet. Thx. He scored the Willie goal
Joe Bowen:
SonofabitchAll smiles..View attachment 641569
Anyone using the word Gosh is aces in my book.
Mitch, that was sick!
Sammy, my man.
Keefe's expectations of Willy are growing, kid was out for a big amount of the 3rd.
TL to tie and JT missing by a whisker at the end.
Maybe my eyes are playing tricks on me...is anyone else seeing the gap between the forwards and D increasing in our zone? During the period when we were losing D to injury every other game, I found our structure to be as tight as I've seen it in years. F coming back, supporting D down low, and really allowing D short passes to break out quickly and effectively. The stretch pass because of the length between the two is becoming a thing again, at least to my eyes, and I think we're having more difficulty breaking out of our end because of it. Or am I wrong?
And both while not playing a complete 60 minutes.2 come from behind wins in a row.
Pretty sure that if the Rangers had played with an empty net the Leafs would have scored more than 4 goals.Marner with an unreal goal.
Not to down play the Rangers but without their goalie, this game may have been a 4-1 game.
Marner, that was gross man
Well if we are splitting hairs, how do they score one less goal if their goalie doesn’t play.Pretty sure that if the Rangers had played with an empty net the Leafs would have scored more than 4 goals.
You forgot the "Kerfoot Factor".Pretty sure that if the Rangers had played with an empty net the Leafs would have scored more than 4 goals.
Marner with an unreal goal.
Not to down play the Rangers but without their goalie, this game may have been a 4-1 game.
I disagree, the Rangers had plenty of chances and played us hard. They also missed a gimme with the Kreider tip that went through the crease along with other huge saves by SamsonovMarner with an unreal goal.
Not to down play the Rangers but without their goalie, this game may have been a 4-1 game.
Hahaha, ya with Boston playing the way they are, not a chance.I'm seeing it too. I'm hoping the answer is that playing that way is too demanding on the forwards in terms of stamina and they don't want them gassed for the playoffs, now that the D is mostly healthy again they can afford to go punch for punch offensively and win more than they lose. Not like an extra few wins will give us any other playoff opponent.
Really hoping that they intend to flip the switch back to the Rielly-less style in the playoffs, when they play the way they are now it looks exactly like every game 7 we've played in the past 5 years. Bunch of messy incomplete breakouts, pace is constantly shifting from nothing happening for 5 minutes to constant breakaways at both ends for a few minutes, and we overthink play in the offensive zone leading to Tavares and Matthews poking at a covered puck as our only consistent chances.
Thx for thatBesides the obvious, I really liked McMann's game again. Especially in the 1st half.
Great play by MM.
Lilly is really good. I said long ago that once he gets more confidence his offensive instincts will start showing and he has done just that this season.
Really like how Keefe would start the OT with Lilly. It shows he has the coach confidence and hope that continues.