Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
Montour is a guy Id like to go after. The Ducks just have so many D. And I don't think he would cost an arm and a leg to acquire.
What makes you say that? Montour's stock keeps going up.
Montour is a guy Id like to go after. The Ducks just have so many D. And I don't think he would cost an arm and a leg to acquire.
What kind of RD would a 1st (top 3 protected for 1 year) Kapanen and Dermott get you?
*edit* RD would have to be 24 or younger.
If Bracco is a right wing I would trade Andersson for him but otherwise think he stays in Calgary. Looms like he's a real player for sure
Tanev is better than a 4-5 dman. He would be really good with Rielly.
Yes, absolutely.
But the poster wasn't offering Tanev, he wanted Kap + Neilson/Dermott for Gudbranson lol
He plays C and RW
Dont even knw who Andersson is tho, info?
edit: nvm i do know him. lets do it.
Sounds like a deal. What's he playing mostly this year? He's racking up the points
Tanev isn't available for what you have listed. Gudbranson, on the other hand, could be had for something like Kapenen, Dermott/Nielsen, and a cap dump not named Lupul/Horton.
Oh so you can't get a top D prospect for a guy like JVR (17 points in 17 games) and a 2nd tier prospect? LOL this only works in NHL 17 I guess (though I haven't played it). If you check a record, you could get a very good defense prospect for someone like Bozak from a team pushing for the cup.
Evander Kane, Kasdorf and Bogo for Meyers, Lemiux, Armia and 1st. Yes these trades do happen when a team sends top pair D for top wing and some spare parts. JVR has better injury record and is also playing very good this season.
Montour is a guy Id like to go after. The Ducks just have so many D. And I don't think he would cost an arm and a leg to acquire.
I'd think we have a better chance at getting Vatanen as not only can Montour replace him due to their similar style, They would save cap and Montour is exempt from the expansion draft. Ducks fans are pretty high on Montour and rightfully so. Obviously this would be a trade made after the playoff's but even than I'm not sure we would have the right deal to satisfy the Ducks need's.
I'd think we have a better chance at getting Vatanen as not only can Montour replace him due to their similar style, They would save cap and Montour is exempt from the expansion draft. Ducks fans are pretty high on Montour and rightfully so. Obviously this would be a trade made after the playoff's but even than I'm not sure we would have the right deal to satisfy the Ducks need's.
I would put our 1st with 1 year of top 3 protection in play as well.
What makes you say that? Montour's stock keeps going up.
Oh so you can't get a top D prospect for a guy like JVR (17 points in 17 games) and a 2nd tier prospect? LOL this only works in NHL 17 I guess (though I haven't played it). If you check a record, you could get a very good defense prospect for someone like Bozak from a team pushing for the cup.
Evander Kane, Kasdorf and Bogo for Myers, Lemieux, Armia and 1st. Yes these trades do happen when a team sends top pair D for top wing and some spare parts. JVR has better injury record and is also playing very good this season.
Though someone like Shattenkirk can be had for the prospect depth we have if St Louis thinks they can't sign him and I would rather go that way since we have tons of UFAs coming off our books next year.
I would put our 1st with 1 year of top 3 protection in play as well.
Montour I think was the most mentioned name in a "best prospect by position that's not in the NHL" thread, he's starting to get a lot of recognition and maybe surpassing Larsson and Theodore now
Of the 3 of them, is there one that you're most willing to part with?