Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 82,878
- 61,615
I'm not making a player to player comparison for Travis to Percy but more from a developmental point of view. To me Percy and Dermott are similar prospects at the same age. Both probably 2nd pairing Puck moving dependable D men with limited offensive upside.
I recall when Percy was drafted, people were similarly high on him at the time citing his hockey IQ. I thought he would be in the NHL once he completed his OHL career due to this, certainly after a short stint in the AHL, I am still surprised he is still in the AHL today.
But anyway, this is where I see the similarity. It will be interesting to watch Dermott's progression, where I think Nielsen has passed him on the depth chart, as he has progressed faster.
Further, I do agree with you on the premise you brought up. Seeing the potential players Leafs passed on to drop down, it may be a possible miscalculation. Only time will tell for this. This is okay to admit as a fan, as you are one of the few that can see not only positive outcomes but negative outcomes. So I commend you for atleast asking the question on the Main board.
It's actually more of an open ended question than a premise because I'm not following Dermott very closely. Often we see guys like Jacob Larsson get monster praise for no discernible statistical reason or any kind of AHL or NHL play, but we hedge on other kids the same age. Why is that? Is this a function of real evaluation or is it organizational bias? I don't recall Dermott being billed as a low upside safe pick either, so the Percy comparison is a bit confusing as well.