They had a really good season. Coach they hired just isn’t particularly young nhl prospect favorable.Whatever happened to a great Wisconsin program. Nowadays, everyone just wants to get out of there or stay far away from it.
They had a really good season. Coach they hired just isn’t particularly young nhl prospect favorable.
There were two different things addressed that are related but not the same. You can be a great program while also not necessarily being one where a lot of first and second round talent goes. The reason for that is the coach.Well yes, but it's no longer a program where big talents want to go. They have lost their status as one of those big time programs where a lot of NHL talent wants to go.
There were two different things addressed that are related but not the same. You can be a great program while also not necessarily being one where a lot of first and second round talent goes. The reason for that is the coach.
Minnesota too.Yes, but Wisconsin was one of them for a long time. Now it almost feels like it's all about BC, BU and Michigan. That's a bit of a shame.
Wisconsin doesn't have an elite pool of in state talent. There are some, but not many. Their main talent pool pipeline is essentially Illinois (Chicago area), which they have to battle Notre Dame, Michigan, Michigan State, & others for players.Yes, but Wisconsin was one of them for a long time. Now it almost feels like it's all about BC, BU and Michigan. That's a bit of a shame.
He had a point and it wasn't huge news??? I'm surprisedAny Coloradans/NCHC watchers have an update on Cleveland? 12 GP, 1 PT at Colorado College.
Isn't he more of a stay-at-home, almost old school defensive dman type of d ?Any Coloradans/NCHC watchers have an update on Cleveland? 12 GP, 1 PT at Colorado College.
Isn't he more of a stay-at-home, almost old school defensive dman type of d ?
Yes, but Wings fans almost universally hate this pick and have really grabbed on to his lack of offence in his career thus far, including before college. Hate cause he was a 2nd round pick, if he was a 5th rounder he would get no hate.
Complete head-scratcher and waste of draft capital, why not gamble on someone with upside-- Heidt, Sawchyn, Dragicevic, etc?Technically he was their 5th pick of the draft so…5th rounder?
Pretty incredible that they hoarded 5 of the first 47 picks that year. They definitely let one of their scouts get too cute with this one.
Draper and Yzerman love these high compete typesComplete head-scratcher and waste of draft capital, why not gamble on someone with upside-- Heidt, Sawchyn, Dragicevic, etc?
The NHL teams look at upside differently than fans. They see upside as big and can skate. Small junior scorers aren’t upside to them.Complete head-scratcher and waste of draft capital, why not gamble on someone with upside-- Heidt, Sawchyn, Dragicevic, etc?
Seems like Fisker Mølgaard fits the bill. Not really a small junior scorer either.Draper and Yzerman love these high compete types
The NHL teams look at upside differently than fans. They see upside as big and can skate. Small junior scorers aren’t upside to them.
He had a lot of great advanced defensive stats last year but for where he was picked you would definitely prefer to see some offence at some point. But he honestly doesn't need to put up any points to carve out an NHL role either with the way he plays.If he's actually a good defensive D, he would make a very good partner for ASP. But it remains to be seen if he's actually good at anything other than being 6'5".
However, if he can play a role as a Nikita Zadorov type with even worse offense but better defense, then he would make an ideal partner to let ASP loose.
Ed-Seider
Cleveland-ASP
I'm guessing this is what the FO had in mind when they picked Cleveland in the same draft as ASP. I still hate the pick though.
You'd hope he's Joel Edmundson or Erik Cernak. But even they had a bit of production, albeit in different leagues.He had a lot of great advanced defensive stats last year but for where he was picked you would definitely prefer to see some offence at some point. But he honestly doesn't need to put up any points to carve out an NHL role either with the way he plays.
Its not the ini style 5'9 puck mover but theres still a need for his role in the league
Or Chiarot, or Mquaid etc.You'd hope he's Joel Edmundson or Erik Cernak. But even they had a bit of production, albeit in different leagues.
I would think the number of 17 year olds playing college hockey is miniscule. Private school kids are generally starting college at 18-19, not including those who are held back a year in middle school for athletic purposes.College sports isn’t supposed to be for the 20-25 crowd. It’s supposed to be for the 17-22 crowd.
I use 17 because there are usually a few high profile players who graduate early. There are also different cutoffs around the USA for what constitutes a graduating class. It can go all the way from like July-July to pretty much year of birth. So you will end up getting some that are playing college athletics that are 17, but yes I agree 17 is usually not as common as 18. 19 is a little high. You really shouldn’t be starting college athletics more than 12 months after graduating high school. And if so, there likely aren’t going to be many 19 year olds at time of starting college if you put that rule into place.I would think the number of 17 year olds playing college hockey is miniscule. Private school kids are generally starting college at 18-19, not including those who are held back a year in middle school for athletic purposes.