Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,981
2,900
My horror card is going to get revoked... I'm ashamed to admit I've never seen Re-Animator. :vampire:
Whaaaaaatt? I'm a Stuart Gordon groupie, one of the few people I've met and was starstrucked. It's a must see! Yuzna's Bride, where he does his best imitation of Gordon's style, is just as good if not better. Just don't bother with the third one.
 
  • Love
Reactions: OzzyFan and shadow1

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
Carrie (1976)
3.35 out of 4stars

“Carrie White, a shy, friendless teenage girl who is sheltered by her domineering, religious mother, unleashes her telekinetic powers after being humiliated by her classmates at her senior prom.”
An excellent supernatural horror drama that delivers cerebrally as well as visually, and metaphorically as well as “literally”. Most well known for its iconic prom scene, but the film is much more than that. Spacek solidly earned a best actor nomination for her role as the protagonist. She is a very interesting character, a sort of sympathetic antihero. Is she a villain in the story? What does one make of her actions? I’ll take a line that kind of fits from Dr. Manhattan of The Watchmen here: “without condemning or condoning, I understand”. Carrie herself and the writing rides the line of her personality and use of her supernatural telekinesis flawlessly throughout. The mixture and strong success of supernatural terror alongside real human horror gives the movie double edged prowess that is a rare accomplishment in film. De Palma’s style, heavily influenced by Hitchcock, while appealing, is highly expressive and symbolic. From his use of colors, to his camera angles/shots, to the film’s score, De Palma’s masterful here with his conveyance. The film works a christian metaphor as a whole with many parts specifically representing and containing meaning (I’ll save examples from ruining the film for others). The film also works as a metaphor for sexuality/sexual maturity and inept authority too. And the obvious direct themes on the surface are bullying, high school’s unavoidable atrocities, the uninhibitedness of some high school students, high school administration’s inability to manage adolescents/or the uncontrollability of high school students, religious extremism, and the many forms evil and good can be found in. The effects of such traumas can lead to tragic events. Shy and introverted results do not mean unaffecting/soothed or a zero possibility for escalation or explosion. There’s also a kind of interesting resolution discussion to be had here involving manual labor punishment, revoking of privileges, penance, understanding, revenge, or even destruction. There’s a lot going on and a lot to interpret here. Supposedly one of the better Stephen King book adaptations also.

Deadstream (2022)
2.85 out of 4stars

“A washed up internet personality tries to win back his followers by livestreaming himself spending one night alone in a haunted house. When he accidentally pisses off a vengeful spirit, his comeback event becomes a real-time fight for his life.”
A great found footage comedy horror that plucks its silly fun strings through an excellent committed redbull induced performance as it progresses into supernatural territory. The haunted house setting creates some spooky atmosphere along with some twists and turns, but this far and away is a comedy throughout with some suspenseful moments sprinkled in. Decently mocks internet bloggers and makes the most of its environment. As long as you don’t find the protagonist botheringly annoying, who is purposely being annoying in a comical way, it’s all in all a relatively short and briskly paced, light and breezy fun ride.

Society (1989)
2.70 out of 4stars

“A Beverly Hills teenager begins to suspect that his wealthy parents are part of a gruesome cult for the social elite.”
A good comedy body horror social satire that is almost entirely known for its third act delivering some twisted, memorable, and metaphorical body horror. Not going to ruin it for anyone who hasn’t seen it, but the ending lives up to the hype with delivering some creatively shocking and grotesque imagery. The social satire elements are clever but nothing notable. The buildup on paper is nothing new, but still a good mixture of campy comedy, serious mystery, and weirdness/oddities.

The Company of Wolves (1984)
2.65 out of 4stars

“A teenage girl in a country manor falls asleep while reading a magazine, and has a disturbing dream involving wolves prowling the woods below her bedroom window during the late 18th century.”
A good gothic fantasy drama horror that is a rather interesting twist on the Red Riding Hood tale, albeit an oddly executed one. Far and away, the visuals are the main attraction here. The forest settings, the make-up scenes, the “action” scenes, and even the time period clothing are eye-grabbing. While there are a few quality werewolf transformation scenes in the film, there is one of the best I’ve ever seen that’s brutal and unforgettable. The themes here are obviously young woman coming of age/hitting-puberty and all the heedings that come along with it, mostly from a protective and sexual manner of boys and their own urges too or the advancements they will meet (and things even beyond that but directly related involving abandonment, cheating, and unexpected pregnancy). The biggest issues with the film for me are its target audience and story style/pacing. The story style and pacing of the movie makes it hard to get into. The film throughout tells about 4 stories, that are within a story, that is within another story. It also moves slowly at a 95minutes runtime, and while all the stories have meaning, they don’t really gel too smoothly, and as “similar anthology films go”, the quality is up and down amongst them. The target audience problem is odd. It feels like the movie tries to have a target audience of tween to young teen girls/women (and possibly boys) given its narrative and heart, but it’s rated R and contains some graphic and heavier material thrown in as well on and off that just mixes the movie’s appeal in a bad way. Some odd decisions/implementations there.

Halloween Ends (2022)
2.65 out of 4stars

“The saga of Michael Myers and Laurie Strode comes to a spine-chilling climax in this final installment of this trilogy. Only one of them will survive.”
A good slasher horror film that takes odd paths and will be divisive amongst audiences, especially purists. This is a spoiler free review for the record. It’s completely different. While I like the risks taken here and change from the norm in an unpredictable way, but the traditional concept and heart of the franchise is severely missing from this conclusory film. The main elements of this franchise take a backseat in the film to a “side story”, that is for the most part entirely introduced and evolved in this one film. That said, we do have a good psychological drama/horror film here. The discussion about EVIL and its many forms, its origins, its locations, its changing faces, its effects, big and small on a first-person/victim/guilty party/kin/outsiders/public-image/town scale is interesting and quality. The personal scale effects and feelings are thoroughly examined too in many different facets of one’s life. I won’t spoon feed the theme or messages, but I feel it's definitely well done. It’s far and away the best and most thoughtful use of side characters, and maybe even deeper themes, in the whole franchise. But there is no proper balance at all here, which is a must given the labeling, meaning, and stakes of the film for the franchise. Myers is 4th fiddle, and Jamie Lee a distant 3rd and/or has some wasted screen moments that feel almost like filler. I wonder if somebody clocked the time Myers was on screen too, because he’s near non-existent in the first third to half of the movie. For an epic conclusion, this is not a Mike Myers film, this is barely labelable a Laurie Strode film. This is a Corey and Allyson film first and foremost, especially Corey. So odd. Personally, the climax is a bit of a let down and a touch sensationalistic, although arguably necessary in its context and purpose altogether. And I loved the shock opening scene, I feel that must be stated. Enjoyable, but not collectively what it should be by any means.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
-1x-1.jpg


Triangle of Sadness (2022) Directed by Reuben Ostland 4B

How in the world did Triangle of Sadness win this year's Palme d'Or at Cannes? Class war comedies can be funny, but not this one. A pair of trendy supermodels, Carl and YaYa get invited on a cruise for the super-rich. On that cruise, they meet a lot of insufferable people. Then they get shipwrecked, and, in the only halfway funny move in the entire film, the one remaining member of the ship's underclass takes over. Scenes come and go, mostly going nowhere fast. The big production number of the movie involves people throwing up in the dining room after eating tainted food followed by gushing toilets of excrement exploding in the state rooms. So do we need a satire that is content with portraying the obvious, that some people of immense privilege can be pains in the ass. It's hard to fathom how the director of Force Majeure could come up with something so disjointed and heavy-handed. I would say that Triangle of Sadness is one of the major disappointments of the year.
 
Last edited:

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
27,246
16,078
Montreal, QC
-1x-1.jpg


Triangle of Sadness (2022) Directed by Reuben Ostland 4B

How in the world did Triangle of Sadness win this year's Palme d'Or at Cannes? Class war comedies can be funny, but not this one. A pair of trendy supermodels, Carl and YaYa get invited on a cruise for the super-rich. On that cruise, they meet a lot of insufferable people. Then they get shipwrecked, and, in the only halfway funny move in the entire film, the one remaining member of the ship's underclass takes over. Scenes come and go, mostly going nowhere fast. The big production number of the movie involves people throwing up in the dining room after eating tainted food followed by gushing toilets of excrement exploding in the state rooms. So do we need a satire that is content with portraying the obvious, that some people of immense privilege can be pains in the ass. It's hard to fathom how the director of Force Majeure could come up with something so disjointed and heavy-handed. I would say that Triangle of Sadness is one of the major disappointments of the year.

Damn, I'm seeing this tonight lol
 

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,728
5,526
They/Them (2022) - 5/10

Whistler Camp, an LGBTQ+ conversion camp, is stalked by a masked killer.

Theo Germain stars as Jordan, a non-binary camper who has only attended the camp to get emancipated from their parents. Owen (Kevin Bacon) runs Whistler Camp and is surprisingly open and warm to the campers, and does his best to make everyone feel comfortable. However, not everything may be as peachy as it seems at this camp. Worse, a mysterious killer lurks in the shadows.

This Blumhouse Production marks the directorial debut John Logan. Logan also writes, and is most well known for his writing work on films like Skyfall (2012) and Alien: Covenant (2017). Despite only coming out two months ago, They/Them has already established itself with a reputation of being a terrible move, currently sporting a 3.8 on IMDB.

I can't say I agree. While the movie is mediocre and forgettable, I didn't think They/Them was the abomination the internet has made it out to be. The film starts out well, with an interesting premise that grabs your attention. The performances are also good, and the characters are distinct enough that you remember who everyone is. Additionally, there was also a twist in the middle of this slasher-mystery that caught me off guard (not the killer reveal - something else).

However, the problem for me was the movie hit a wall about 45 minutes in. The pacing suddenly became plodding, with too much melodrama clogging up the narrative. I know this movie has a message to say about the LGBTQ+ community, but you can't forget about the horror...which this movie does; it's not scary or particularly gory. That's not a good recipe for a slasher movie, nor is the fact that you'd need to be legally blind to not see who the killer is long before the reveal.

Overall, They/Them is a below average movie, and a light 5 for me. It's surprisingly watchable, but is a film you're likely to forget about the moment the credits roll. It's somewhat of a shame too, because it feels like they might've been a few changes away from a solid movie. Either way, I'm shocked at this film's IMDB score. 3.8? For crying out loud, people think this is worse than 2002's Halloween: Resurrection (3.9)?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: OzzyFan

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
YouWontBeAloneFeat.jpg


You Won't Be Alone (2022) Directed by Goran Stolevski 7B

In rural Macedonia in the 18th century, a peasant woman makes a desperate bargain with a witch who has haunted the region for nearly 200 years. She is allowed to keep her infant daughter Nevena until she is sixteen years old, after which the girl becomes the apprentice of the witch. The mother tries to hide the girl in a deep cave, but all that does is impede her development. Marked by the witch so she cannot speak, Nevena is finally forced to submit to the inevitable. However, because she is so easily distracted by the life going on around her, the witch abandons her to her own devices. Most of the movie is from the young woman's point of view, her thoughts being expressed in non-grammatical but quite evocative verbal fragments. On her own, her mind a virtual tabula rasa, she uses her shape-shifting abilities to find out what it means to be human, to discover the intricacies of the world she inhabits. Alas, this can be a messy process. She goes through several permutations, including a cat and a dog, before she finally finds a comfortable host in which she hopes to settle. Slowly, she learns about the cruelties and pleasures of being alive. The audience, for good or ill, shares her self-discovery.

While there is body horror and some gore, You Won't Be Alone is a very unconventional horror movie. About 900 critics have compared this movie to Terrence Malick's Tree of Life-style abstractions. While no question You Won't Be Alone has an ethereal quality, it is also more down-to-earth than Malick's recent artsy meanderings. Relying primarily upon images and a host of good actors who in combination communicate the young woman's dawning consciousness, the movie casts a unique spell. While undoubtedly some will find this movie way too artsy for their taste, others will find Nevena's journey not quite like anything that they have experienced before at the movies.

subtitles

Best of 2022

1) Decision to Leave, Park, South Korea
2} Aftersun, Wells UK
3) No Bears, J. Panahi, Iran
4) Hit the Road, P. Panahi, Iran
5) Everything Everywhere All at Once, Kwan/Scheinert, US
6) You Won't Be Alone, Stovelski, Macedonia
7) Vortex, Noe, France
8) The Eternal Daughter, Hogg, UK
9) Official Competition, Cohn/Duprat, Spain
10) Mad God, Tippett, US
 
Last edited:

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,281
17,341
I watched The Rise of Skywalker last night

I don't understand how Disney could buy Star Wars and make three films as disjointed and nonsensical as this trilogy. The Force Awakens was pointless and a straight copy of IV, The Last Jedi was good, The Rise of Skywalker was completely idiotic from top to bottom. I wish I could have seen the reaction to it live at the time. I imagine it would have been enjoyable.
 

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,785
4,918
OurHospitality_03.jpg

Our Hospitality-1923

The Canfield/McKay feud has been passed down to another generation. Willie McKay (Buster Keaton) has inherited a property, where he returns to find himself in the middle of the ancestral feud. The train in the film is from the 1830's and real. Willie's ride to his anticipated palatial estate is scenic and full of gags. Buster is in top form in his directorial debut. His stunts are awesome, especially the climax scene. His real life wife plays his leading lady. They don't make'em like this no more (be nice if they would!). Classic fun film.

18613085.jpg

Invincible-2006

Mid 1970's, the NFL Philadelphia Eagles were really bad and hadn't won much in 10+ years. They hire a new coach (Dick Vermeil) and he comes up with an interesting pr move, an open tryout. Some nice performances especially Mark Wahlberg as Vince Papale. Interesting that this story happened a few months before Rocky was released seeing the parallels. A great story, well told.

the-seventh-veil-6426_3.jpg

The Seventh Veil-1945

A traumatized girl (Ann Todd) recounts her past to a doctor(Herbert Lom) after a suicide attempt. It's a psychological story as the doctor probes her subconcious through hypnosis. She was a concert pianist and there is great deal of piano music in the film. James Mason as the cold, wealthy cousin who has avoided women but now becomes a controlling overseer of his protégé. Folks who are familiar with films like Spellbound, The Three Faces of Eve and Freud may enjoy this film. Good Cast, very well done.

train2.jpg

The Train-1964

Paris, August 1944 and with the Allied forces approaching there is a mass evacuation back to Germany. A train is ordered to transport back many classic paintings pillaged from all over France. The French resistance plans to try stop the train. There is a ton of action in the film, especailly the train wrecks (real ones). Burt Lancaster shows off his great agility doing his own stunts. Also does some detailed intricate shots himself, like making a bearing for the train engine or rigging a bomb, step by step. Some of the story is based on facts, beautiful cinematography with many elongated shots. A lot of attention to detail, must have had a big budget. Top notch.
 

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,728
5,526
Grave Encounters (2011) - 6/10

The crew of a ghost hunting show lock themselves inside a haunted mental hospital.

Sean Rogerson as Lance, the director of the reality ghost hunting show named "Grave Encounters". As the show is in its infancy, Sean tries to boost popularity by taking the show to Collingwood Psychiatric Hospital, which has a reputation of unexplained activity. The Grave Encounters crew - Sean, along with a surveillance operator (Juan Riedinger), cameraman (Merwin Mondesir), occult specialist (Ashleigh Gryzko), and medium (Mackenzie Gray) - lock themselves in the hospital overnight, planning to film some sensationalist footage. However, they get more than they bargained for when they start experiencing real phenomena and one member goes missing...

Directed by Colin Minihan and Stuart Ortiz, Grave Encounters is a low budget found footage film. These films tend to be a dime a dozen, and are usually very generic. While Grave Encounters doesn't add anything particularly new or interesting to the genre, I still think it was an effective movie with decent suspense.

I enjoyed how the film portrays the "Grave Encounters" crew as a bunch of charlatans (which is how many "real" ghost hunters are viewed), only for them to find out they bit off more than they can chew. Also, though there were one or two questionable decisions, for the most part the characters made logical choices to try to escape the hospital, and the film creates a lot of dread when they can't.

Grave Encounters isn't a perfect film though, as some issues rear their ugly heads as the run time progresses. The worst of these are computer effects that show up towards the middle of the movie, and they're really bad. In fact, so bad I was laughing during once scene that was supposed to be scary! This is really jarring because the movie has good tension up until this point. Also, without getting into spoilers, I thought the ending was a little cheesy and somewhat tacked on. I also didn't like the fact that so much of the footage in the movie has a weird pixelation effect - digital footage doesn't do this.

Still, Grave Encounters is a solid found footage film. It's definitely worthy of a late night viewing if you're in the mood for this type of movie.
 

GlassesJacketShirt

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
11,673
4,718
Sherbrooke
Tenet (2020)
Dir. by Christopher Nolan

1666183248449.png


Easily Nolan's worst film by a mile, and one of the worst action adventure experiences I've had in recent memory.

A complex plot wrapped in bad casting, blank characters, clunky dialogue, and horrendous sound editing. It managed to be loud and boring simultaneously, like Michael Bay at his worst but with the pretentiousness of an auteur.

In retrospect, perhaps Nolan is not cut out to do Bond at all.

Score: 2/10
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodgerwilco

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,728
5,526
The Night Stalker (1972) - 6/10

A Las Vegas reporter investigates a series of muders that seem to be committed by a vampire.

This made for TV movie stars Darren McGavin as Carl Kolchak, an aggressive veteran reporter who doesn't make a lot of friends. He's sent on a seemingly boring murder case, until he discovers the victim has been drained of their blood. As the bodycount rises, Kolchak quickly comes to the conclusion the killings are done by a vampire, or a crazy person who thinks they're one. The District Attorney (Kent Smith) and Chief of Police (Charles McGraw) think this is ludicrous, but don't have a better explanation and aren't sure how to handle the situation.

The Night Stalker was directed by John Llewellyn Moxey and was produced by Dan Curtis (Dark Shadows), with the teleplay written by Richard Matheson (I Am Legend). The film was a massive success when it aired on the ABC network, leading it to be released theatrically, and leading to both a TV movie sequel (1973's The Night Strangler) and a short lived TV series (1974's Kolchak: The Night Strangler).

The film was also an inspiration for future series The X-Files (1993-2018), and you can see why. While The Night Stalker does have a few horror and action scenes (the action scenes are surprisingly done very well), the film mostly focuses on the bureaucracy of the situation. Just like Mulder in the X-Files, the police and even his own paper want to keep a lid on Kolchak's vampire story, despite knowing he's right.

Overall, solid little movie. I say little because the film has a brisk 74 minute run time, and almost feels like a long TV episode. The Night Stalker is horribly dated (that music...) with little-to-no scares, but is still an interesting movie to check out.
 

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,777
4,899
Toronto
Letter From My Village / Kaddu Beykat (Safi Faye, 1976)

In a small rural Senegalese village, plagued by droughts and poor crops, a young man Ngor wishes to marry a local girl, however he cannot afford the bride price to marry her. He moves to Dakar to work and earn money but experiences exploitation from wealthy cityfolk and soon returns to his hometown. Part neorealist film, part documentary, part ethnography of village life in Senegal, Letter From My Village is the first feature film directed by an African woman. The film is shot in her family village and features her grandfather (who the film is dedicated to as her died shortly after filming) and is a powerful reflection of village life and exploitation by the state and the bourgeoisie in postcolonial Senegal. Not afraid to linger on the slow aspects of farm life, the film does have a deliberate pace that can take some time to adjust but with patience there is a rich and profound perspective articulated in the film. Extremely underwatched film, worth checking out.

 

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,728
5,526
Pitch Black (2000) - 6/10

A space ship carrying a prisoner crash lands on a planet filled with creatures that live in darkness, just in time for an eclipse.

The film stars Radha Mitchell as Carolyn Fry, the pilot of a spaceship transporting passengers in cryostasis. The ship crashes, killing the captain and most of the passengers, leaving Fry in charge of trying to lead the survivors off the planet. Amongst the dozen-or-so living is a Muslim Priest (Keith David), law enforcement officer (Cole Hauser), and most importantly the prisoner Riddick (Vin Diesel), a criminal with modified eyes who can see in the dark. While searching for supplies, one of the survivors is killed by a group of creatures who reside in the darkness. As the rest of the characters try to figure out their next move, things go from bad-to-worse when an eclipse engulfs the planet in darkness.

Pitch Black was directed by David Twohy, most famous for his writing work on films like The Fugitive (1993) and G.I. Jane (1996). This movie was the breakout starring role for Vin Diesel, who turned into an A-List star and later headlined several movies from "The Fast and the Furious" series, as well as two sequels to this film: The Chronicles of Riddick (2004) and Riddick (2013).

How does the first of this trilogy fare? Meh. The film doesn't have any major issues, though the first hour is a bit slow. Rather than focusing on horror elements, the film gets bogged down in melodrama. Many of the major themes and subplots are very cliche - the reluctant leader; the prisoner who's actually good; the character who isn't who they say they are. We've seen it all before, but usually not at the same time. It comes off as ham fisted.

There is some good atmosphere once the eclipse finally happens, as well as some good action, but some of that is off-set by some mistimed comedic relief. In a movie that mostly plays it straight, it's awkward when people belt out one-liners as they're mortally wounded. There were also some strange choices by director Twohy, including this weird "stretch" distortion effect in a few scenes.

Overall, Pitch Black is a popcorn movie. I was a little disappointed with it based on IMDB's current 7.1 rating because I found it to be pretty generic. The film doesn't do anything exceptional, nor does it have any crippling issues. It's the type of film you turn your brain off and watch, and then immediately forget about once the credits roll.
 

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
Candyman (1992)
3.20 out of 4stars

“The Candyman, a murderous soul with a hook for a hand, is accidentally summoned to reality by a skeptic grad student researching the monster's myth.”
A great supernatural psychological slasher horror that delivers quality thrills and social commentary. Tony Todd in the titular role is great, as is Madsen in the lead, and the Phillip Glass score enhances its uneasy mood well. The film just checked all the boxes for me. It balances real horrors alongside supernatural horrors, while storybuilding and sending messages in a continually enthralling and thought provoking manner. It delivers on the gore and tension with aplomb also. The villain is different, meaningful, frightening, and seductive. And the social commentary going on feels endless and still pertinent 30years later: projects, classism, race relations, obscurity, stereotyping, double standards, negligence, gentrification, small and large scale causation, etc. Even the college professor side character has notable symbolism. Surprisingly, I never knew this was based off of a Clive Barker short story.

Phenomena (uncut version) (1985)
3.10 out of 4stars

“From Dario Argento, an American girl that has recently transferred to a Swiss boarding school, discovers with the help of an entomologist that she has psychic powers that allow her to communicate with insects, and uses them to pursue a serial killer who is butchering young women at and around the school.”
A great supernatural horror mystery that brings an insecty twist and loads of visual flair to a weird and fun murder mystery adventure. I repeat again, I love Argento’s directing style. I can’t point out all the technical stuff, but I will define it as spellbinding and attractive and shows exactly what the audience wants or needs to see to experience scenes precisely as they are meant to. Some great shots and cinematography here. While the story and its elements are a little all over the place and some underdeveloped, it's never boring or incoherent. There is tons of mood, fast pacing, quality visuals, murders, suspense, a great score (save a few metal songs that feel a bit out of place), some well done gore, and metaphorical dribbles. Also, you get flys, bees, beetles, a chimpanzee, maggots, and more maggots, and other insects too. Some nice little droppings throughout about the extraordinary, or “unique”, different types of intelligence, abilities, and resiliencies some insects and even chimps exhibit (and even 1 or 2 about mother nature herself). There’s a lot going on and some of it is whacky, but not at all in a bad way. And the ending just shocks even more and cranks everything to 11. I won’t ruin it, but man it delivers and then some. Also, we get to interestingly see what a pre-nose job, and possibly other plastic surgery, teenage Jennifer Connelly looked like.

Fright Night (1985)
3.00 out of 4stars

“A teenager discovers that the newcomer in his neighborhood is a vampire, so he turns to an actor in a television horror show for help dealing with the undead.”
A great supernatural comedy horror that has a silly fun 80’s vibe to with its modern day vampire twist. It all works, and kind of feels like a parody and homage of the 80’s and vampires altogether in an entertaining and true to material extensively form. Most memorable for me are the make-up effects, the soundtrack, and Chris Sarandon’s performance as the vampire. Sarandon’s turn is pitch perfect: cool, charismatic, entrancing, domineering, and frightening when need be. To be honest, all the side character’s are great and the main protagonist is the weakest link of the story, albeit he is written as the straight man of the film. The vampires look great and scary too.

Stonehearst Asylum (aka Eliza Graves) (2014)
2.75 out of 4stars

“In 1899, an Oxford graduate takes up a job in a mental asylum, only to discover that the "revolutionary" new treatments are inhumane, and that there is more going on than meets the eye.”
A great gothic mystery thriller drama that is a visually appealing period piece as well as a solid chess match amongst its main characters. It is a film that’s best to know nothing about going into given all the twists and turns unfolding throughout, so I will complete this review with that in mind. I found it solidly engaging and entertaining. The film is also a kind of genre mashup, able to fit into many cross genres and have a few different interpretations of its motives/events. My personal interpretation of this outermost “period thriller” is its commentary on mental illness during its time period of the late 1800’s. Treatments were incredibly variable and often experimental with a wide range or unknown results. Some people were wrongly considered or put into mental asylums as well at the time. At their worst, some acted as prisons and torture places for misunderstood people where “crimes against humanity” occurred on grand scales. Some, even to this day, act and react to these patients with treatments that are in the staff and management’s best interests instead of the “sick’s” own personal well being. Quality of life for the mentally ill becoming a secondary concern. At the end of the day, they are still people. Also at the end of the day, quality of life for those afflicted, especially in this realm of disease, is the most important goal of all. Some are highly functional and intelligent, some incredibly enslaved by their affliction and likely incurable. And to this day even, we still don’t know enough about mental illness or how the mind works and rarely is a treatment or a pill one size fits all, as oddly some commercials for prescription drugs would suggest. Mental illness is an invisible disease. All of this isn’t just a rant or expansion of ideas either, it directly relates to the film’s subject matter.

Black Sheep (2006)
2.40 out of 4stars

“When sheep-fearing Henry returns to his brother's New Zealand farm, he finds genetically altered sheep that prey on humans and turn their victims into undead, wooly killers. Shear madness ensues as Henry, an animal-rights activist, and a farmhand set out to stop the rampaging animals.”
A good dark comedy sci-fi horror guilty pleasure that delivers the b-movie fun with its absurd premise. You get all the zombie sheep and humanoid sheep chaos you could ask for. Gleefully gorey and violent with a couple of appropriately bizarre twists. The film knows what it wants to do and does it playfully with chuckle-inducement and visual treats throughout. Solid production values and acting(not that it has oscar worthy material by any means though) throughout too.
 

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,777
4,899
Toronto
Amores Perros (Alejandro González Iñárritu, 2000)

When a young man crashes his car flee from some gangsters, he intertwines the lives of himself (a dogfighter owner who wants to steal his brother’s wife), a supermodel, and a homeless ex-con hitman. The film is essentially segmented into three short films about these three character’s lives and their connection either before or after the accident. Combined the film is over two and a half hours long, and with its content full of tragedy and suffering it is honestly an exhausting experience. Haven’t seen much of Iñárritu but I understand that these interconnected characters and destinies is kind of his style but it reminds me too much of Crash (to his credit this film predates it). Also certainly not for the faint of heart as the film features frequent dogfighting and extreme animal cruelty.

 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,771
3,808
Candyman (1992)
3.20 out of 4stars

“The Candyman, a murderous soul with a hook for a hand, is accidentally summoned to reality by a skeptic grad student researching the monster's myth.”
A great supernatural psychological slasher horror that delivers quality thrills and social commentary. Tony Todd in the titular role is great, as is Madsen in the lead, and the Phillip Glass score enhances its uneasy mood well. The film just checked all the boxes for me. It balances real horrors alongside supernatural horrors, while storybuilding and sending messages in a continually enthralling and thought provoking manner. It delivers on the gore and tension with aplomb also. The villain is different, meaningful, frightening, and seductive. And the social commentary going on feels endless and still pertinent 30years later: projects, classism, race relations, obscurity, stereotyping, double standards, negligence, gentrification, small and large scale causation, etc. Even the college professor side character has notable symbolism. Surprisingly, I never knew this was based off of a Clive Barker short story.

Phenomena (uncut version) (1985)
3.10 out of 4stars

“From Dario Argento, an American girl that has recently transferred to a Swiss boarding school, discovers with the help of an entomologist that she has psychic powers that allow her to communicate with insects, and uses them to pursue a serial killer who is butchering young women at and around the school.”
A great supernatural horror mystery that brings an insecty twist and loads of visual flair to a weird and fun murder mystery adventure. I repeat again, I love Argento’s directing style. I can’t point out all the technical stuff, but I will define it as spellbinding and attractive and shows exactly what the audience wants or needs to see to experience scenes precisely as they are meant to. Some great shots and cinematography here. While the story and its elements are a little all over the place and some underdeveloped, it's never boring or incoherent. There is tons of mood, fast pacing, quality visuals, murders, suspense, a great score (save a few metal songs that feel a bit out of place), some well done gore, and metaphorical dribbles. Also, you get flys, bees, beetles, a chimpanzee, maggots, and more maggots, and other insects too. Some nice little droppings throughout about the extraordinary, or “unique”, different types of intelligence, abilities, and resiliencies some insects and even chimps exhibit (and even 1 or 2 about mother nature herself). There’s a lot going on and some of it is whacky, but not at all in a bad way. And the ending just shocks even more and cranks everything to 11. I won’t ruin it, but man it delivers and then some. Also, we get to interestingly see what a pre-nose job, and possibly other plastic surgery, teenage Jennifer Connelly looked like.

Fright Night (1985)
3.00 out of 4stars

“A teenager discovers that the newcomer in his neighborhood is a vampire, so he turns to an actor in a television horror show for help dealing with the undead.”
A great supernatural comedy horror that has a silly fun 80’s vibe to with its modern day vampire twist. It all works, and kind of feels like a parody and homage of the 80’s and vampires altogether in an entertaining and true to material extensively form. Most memorable for me are the make-up effects, the soundtrack, and Chris Sarandon’s performance as the vampire. Sarandon’s turn is pitch perfect: cool, charismatic, entrancing, domineering, and frightening when need be. To be honest, all the side character’s are great and the main protagonist is the weakest link of the story, albeit he is written as the straight man of the film. The vampires look great and scary too.

Stonehearst Asylum (aka Eliza Graves) (2014)
2.75 out of 4stars

“In 1899, an Oxford graduate takes up a job in a mental asylum, only to discover that the "revolutionary" new treatments are inhumane, and that there is more going on than meets the eye.”
A great gothic mystery thriller drama that is a visually appealing period piece as well as a solid chess match amongst its main characters. It is a film that’s best to know nothing about going into given all the twists and turns unfolding throughout, so I will complete this review with that in mind. I found it solidly engaging and entertaining. The film is also a kind of genre mashup, able to fit into many cross genres and have a few different interpretations of its motives/events. My personal interpretation of this outermost “period thriller” is its commentary on mental illness during its time period of the late 1800’s. Treatments were incredibly variable and often experimental with a wide range or unknown results. Some people were wrongly considered or put into mental asylums as well at the time. At their worst, some acted as prisons and torture places for misunderstood people where “crimes against humanity” occurred on grand scales. Some, even to this day, act and react to these patients with treatments that are in the staff and management’s best interests instead of the “sick’s” own personal well being. Quality of life for the mentally ill becoming a secondary concern. At the end of the day, they are still people. Also at the end of the day, quality of life for those afflicted, especially in this realm of disease, is the most important goal of all. Some are highly functional and intelligent, some incredibly enslaved by their affliction and likely incurable. And to this day even, we still don’t know enough about mental illness or how the mind works and rarely is a treatment or a pill one size fits all, as oddly some commercials for prescription drugs would suggest. Mental illness is an invisible disease. All of this isn’t just a rant or expansion of ideas either, it directly relates to the film’s subject matter.

Black Sheep (2006)
2.40 out of 4stars

“When sheep-fearing Henry returns to his brother's New Zealand farm, he finds genetically altered sheep that prey on humans and turn their victims into undead, wooly killers. Shear madness ensues as Henry, an animal-rights activist, and a farmhand set out to stop the rampaging animals.”
A good dark comedy sci-fi horror guilty pleasure that delivers the b-movie fun with its absurd premise. You get all the zombie sheep and humanoid sheep chaos you could ask for. Gleefully gorey and violent with a couple of appropriately bizarre twists. The film knows what it wants to do and does it playfully with chuckle-inducement and visual treats throughout. Solid production values and acting(not that it has oscar worthy material by any means though) throughout too.

Sometimes when I'm feeling down I think of the end of Phenomena and laugh.
 

Deleted member 28548

Guest


Where The Crawdad's Sing - 2022
8 out of 10

Daisy-Edgar Jones following up on a solid performance in Fresh does an even better job here in a movie that is filled with an endless string of unsettling, emotional disappointments. She gets to showcase way more emotional range here and this is by far the best of her movies to date that I've seen with her in a leading role as Kya Clark. Jojo Regina who plays young Kya does a decent job with her early scenes while Edgar-Jones carries forward through her advancing years. Part court-room drama, part murder mystery, part coming of age tale, this one is well cast with Olivia Newman directing after doing mostly tv work before this. She makes the transition effectively from TV to filmwork with the help of everyone around her. Based on a best selling book which I can't really comment on as to how faithful it is to its original adaptation as I haven't read it yet, but its a slow moving feature that delivers some excellent scenery all throughout highlighted with strong acting and a well written story line. Some may find the pacing to be too slow, but I don't mind slow burns when the payoff is ultimately worth it at the end and it certainly is here. Heart breaking at times, but overall a good watch. Looking forward to seeing more from Daisy-Edgar Jones in the future. She seems poised to have a promising career ahead of her at this point.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan and Osprey

Deleted member 28548

Guest


Vesper - 2022
3 out of 10

Finished this one last night after hearing a lot of recent praise for this on Twitter from various reviewers who had recently seen it. For the positives I did like a lot of the visuals and imagery and I liked that the writers/directors set out to do something unique in a lot of ways. Looks and sounds good. Acting was a mixed bag for me. The young lead actress who plays Vesper Raffiella Chapman was ok in my opinion. Nothing too extraordinary here. Other character performances were hit and miss for me. Sound design was good in parts. Music by Dan Levy was strong at times. I did have problems connecting with the storyline and embracing the vast majority of the characters here save for Vesper with her wiser then years driven determination for bringing change. Much like Amazon’s recent Rings Of Power, I was left feeling that while this looked and sounded great, everything else about it just wasn't really resonating for me. A tighter script with more exciting plot and action would’ve done wonders here. Prolonged stretches go by throughout the film’s nearly two hour duration where very little of interest actually happens on screen. Super slow pacing with a really abrupt ending to the point where it felt like the resolution wasn’t satisfying enough. In different more competent hands, this could have been a much better movie then the one we are left with here. Ultimately, it’s a lot of unrealized and unfulfilled potential that never adds up to an enjoyable or memorable story. This could have been so much more. From the trailer alone i really wanted to like this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan and Osprey

Puck

Ninja
Jun 10, 2003
10,772
421
Ottawa
The New York Times today published an article on their front runners or the movies that got the biggest boost from the film festivals. There are 8 released films and three mentions on yet to be released in 2022. A favorite here ‘Everything Everywhere All at Once’ gets a nod from the Editors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Eight Film Festival Movies That Got the Biggest Awards Boost

By Kyle Buchanan


Who are the front-runners, the dark horses and the long shots? After major film festivals in Venice, Telluride and Toronto, where most of the year’s remaining prestige films have screened, the awards season has finally begun to come into focus.

There are still a few significant contenders yet to debut, like Damien Chazelle’s glitzy Hollywood drama “Babylon,” and the industry is buzzing that Apple will soon announce a year-end release for its big-budget slavery drama, “Emancipation,” even though the film’s leading man, Will Smith, was banned from attending the Oscars for the next decade. And some tantalizing questions from these festivals still linger, like whether “Glass Onion,” the rollicking sequel to “Knives Out,” can score the best-picture nomination that the first film missed out on.

But in the meantime, here are the eight films that came out of the fall festivals with the biggest awards-season pop.

‘The Whale’
There are few things Oscar voters prefer more than a transformational role and a comeback narrative, and this season, Brendan Fraser’s got both. In Darren Aronofsky’s new drama, Fraser wears a prosthetic bodysuit to transform into a 600-pound shut-in named Charlie, who attempts to reconnect with his angry daughter (Sadie Sink) as his health falters. Interest is high in the 53-year-old actor’s return to the limelight, and every time a clip hit social media of the emotional Fraser soaking up applause in Venice and Toronto, a young generation raised on his heroics in “The Mummy” reliably made those videos go viral. Though some festival pundits have taken issue with the film’s depiction of an obese protagonist, awards voters will still be wowed by Fraser’s work, making him this year’s prohibitive best-actor favorite.

‘The Fabelmans’
Steven Spielberg’s new film about his own coming-of-age was warmly received in Toronto, where Michelle Williams won best-in-show notices as Mitzi, the theatrical mother of the movie’s young Spielberg stand-in. Expect the actress to pick up her fifth Oscar nomination and, if she is run as a supporting performer, her first win. Even before its festival debut, awards watchers thought Spielberg’s film would land at the top of their best-picture prediction lists, but the film isn’t juggernaut-shaped — it’s lighter, more intimate and an appealing ramble in a way that people might not have anticipated. That may mean that the field is still open for a best-picture favorite to emerge, or perhaps “The Fabelmans” could sneak its way there in the end without earning the resentment accrued by an early-season front-runner.

‘Tár’
It’s been 16 years since Todd Field last directed a film, but expect his third feature, “Tár,” to hit the Oscar-nominated heights of his predecessors, “In the Bedroom” and “Little Children.” It will certainly be one of the year’s most talked-about movies: The story touches on hot-button topics like cancel culture and #MeToo as it follows a famed conductor (Cate Blanchett) whose career begins to crumble when her past catches up with her. Blanchett earned career-best raves at Venice for the role — and taught herself German, piano and conducting to boot — so a third Oscar is well within reach. Still, a strong year for best-actress contenders will make Blanchett’s battle a fierce one.

‘The Banshees of Inisherin’
Five years after “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri” earned Oscars for Frances McDormand and Sam Rockwell, the writer-director Martin McDonagh is back with a dark comedy whose cast could run the table, too. Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson are longtime friends whose relationship is severed in the most baffling way, and Farrell’s constant attempts to mend the rift push their petty grievances into the realm of tragedy. Both men are wonderful and will probably earn their first Oscar nominations, but if voters really flip for the film — and I suspect they will — then the supporting performers Kerry Condon (as Farrell’s sister) and Barry Keoghan (as a cockeyed friend) will be in the mix as well.

‘Women Talking’
This Sarah Polley-directed drama about Mennonite women in crisis was Telluride’s most significant world premiere this year, and in that Colorado enclave, which regularly draws a large contingent of Oscar voters, “Women Talking” did quite well. With a sprawling ensemble cast that includes awards favorites Rooney Mara, Jessie Buckley and Claire Foy — as well as three-time best-actress winner McDormand in a small role — “Women Talking” should nab several nominations, even though some of the male viewers I spoke to after the film’s Toronto screening proved surprisingly resistant to the film’s feature-long debate about sexual violence.

‘The Woman King’
Forget “Women Talking,” how about women fighting? This old-fashioned action epic from the director Gina Prince-Bythewood played through the roof in Toronto and stars Viola Davis as the leader of the Agojie, an all-female group of warriors defending their kingdom in 1820s West Africa. Davis is an Oscar winner (with three more nominations, too) who called “The Woman King” her magnum opus while introducing the film, and a performance this passionate and athletic should be in contention all season. But a notable box-office haul will be crucial to the film’s fate (it opens Friday), since even bigger action films like “Avatar: The Way of Water” and “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever” are due at year’s end and will be following Oscar-nominated predecessors.

Editors’ Picks

‘All the Beauty and the Bloodshed’
The expansion of the best picture race to 10 nominees has made room for all sorts of previously snubbed movies, from Marvel spectaculars to Pixar tentpoles. But when will a documentary be nominated for best picture? Laura Poitras’s new film, “All the Beauty and the Bloodshed,” beat all fiction narratives at Venice to take the Golden Lion, the fest’s top award, and this portrait of photographer Nan Goldin as she protests the wealthy Sackler family’s role in the opioid crisis will be distributed by Neon, the company that managed an Oscar first with the Korean-language best picture winner “Parasite.” At the very least, “All the Beauty” will be a strong contender for the documentary Oscar that Poitras won for her 2014 film about Edward Snowden, “Citizenfour.”

‘Everything Everywhere All at Once’
This A24 film from the directing team Daniels opened way back in March, but you’d hardly know that based on the major festival tributes to its star, Michelle Yeoh, in both Toronto and Venice. A flag was planted in both places: This indie hit has now entered its awards-campaign phase, and since the fall festivals didn’t produce major front-runners in the picture and directing categories, expect “Everything Everywhere,” to gun for recognition in both races as well as the supporting actor category (where Ke Huy Quan could be this year’s Troy Kotsur), original screenplay and more. Yeoh’s best-actress nomination is almost certain, though she’ll face plenty of competition from Blanchett. Both women were handed dazzling signature roles this year, and their race should be the season’s most exciting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan and kihei

Ad

Ad

Ad