Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
The Gingerdead Man: no comparison whatsoever, this one is half-baked.

Something good came out of this misbegotten exercise, though. I originally typed in The Gingerbread Man by mistake and discovered a Robert Altman movie with a great cast that I never knew existed.

I am suspicious that you hate Gary Busey…

It's now your turn to challenge him back, kihei. Might I suggest Sergei Bondarchuk's 7-hour War and Peace?

Awhile back Kihei got me to watch ‘the worst movie ever made’, so no experience will ever top that.

That uh, film.. was so bad I can’t even remember the name.

Think it was royal people doing all this bad shit to their slaves.

The experience made me question my life choices that had brought me to that lowly place.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: OzzyFan

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951)
3.60 out of 4stars

“After humanity has developed nuclear weaponry, an alien lands in Washington D.C. and tells the people of Earth that they must live peacefully or be destroyed as a danger to other planets.”
An excellent sci-fi drama with supreme wisdom and futuristic tactics. Far and away, this is a thinking viewer’s sci-fi film. The film constantly spreads its enlightenment on topics of mass destruction weaponry, fear, aggression, survival, logic vs emotions, prejudices/jealousies/convictions, war, peace, self-destruction, and technological/intellectual human advancement and prosperity. There are also cool implementations of non-violent defenses (preventative/counter methods, arguably not attacks although could definitely be implemented as first strikes). In a positive way, the whole film feels like a meditation on grand scale humanity and suggestions on where it should go if it wants to flourish and possibly even exist eternally in the future. Also, it feels like Klaatu is a Christ figure, but definitely not exact, moreso in a supernatural alien form vs deity based character. Ancient aliens should love that representation. :)

Eraserhead (1977)
3.20 out of 4stars

“In David Lynch’s first feature length film, Henry resides alone in a bleak apartment surrounded by industrial gloom. When he discovers that an earlier fling with Mary X left her pregnant, he marries the expectant mother and has her move in with him. Things take a decidedly strange turn afterward.”
A great surreal horror whose technical accomplishments are matched by its bleak otherworldly creativity. Abstractly bizarre and intriguing, contextually frightening. To me, the film is an expressive nightmare of how our protagonist sees the world, life, parenthood, and domestication. Altogether an industrial post-apocalyptic-esque world that is dismal at best, and intrusive or aggressive at its worst. It portrays the marriage/baby lifestyle as one full of sacrifice, arguments, and whimpering/wailing. It’s a life of stressful obligations instead of personal freedoms and ideals. And I won’t spoil anything, but the nightmare unwinds in a dark and hallucinatory disjointed fashion. The industrial soundtrack is a character in itself here too. The sound effects are a lingering nag, and “In Heaven” is a vague haunting call that can be seen as ominous, optimistic, or even a siren song to a likely darker alternative. The black and white filming works like a charm with its lighting choices and adds another layer of uneasy atmosphere to the story. Jack Nance as the protagonist is the many of many faces and some mannerisms, always displaying his feelings in an odd, almost darkly comic fashion. Speaking of, there are a few black comedy touches throughout that hit, especially Mary’s father and even Mary’s mom a bit. And of course I need mention of the “mutant” baby: memorable, and physically perturbing with it’s minimal actions and animalistic side eyed flat nosed perpendicularly egg-shaped head. It's quite the experience.

Inferno (1980)
3.10 out of 4stars

“An American college student in Rome and his sister in New York investigate a series of killings in both locations where their resident addresses are the domain of two covens of witches.”
A great supernatural horror whose prestige would be much higher regarded if it weren’t compared to the film it sequeled, Suspiria. Argento’s films at their best just hypnotize me, full of infinite style and allure, and this one fits that feeling to a tee. Most of the film plays out like a nightmare you just can’t escape from, with heavy eerie mood and great murders to go alongside endlessly colorful set pieces and macabre elements. I’d say the theme is the age old warning, “don’t play with matches or you’ll get burned”, or more appropriately here, beware of the horrors and dangers living in the world of darkness. And Keith Emerson just knocked the soundtrack out of the park, mixing his prog background perfectly into the story’s vibe. While definitely more an experience than coherence/explanation, it more than delivers on the former with the world one is brought into.

Dead Calm (1989)
2.75 out of 4stars

“After the tragic death of their son, John Ingram and his wife Rae are spending some time isolated at sea, when they come across a stranger who has abandoned a sinking ship.”
A great psychological thriller that layers on the suspense and tension while being led by a great Nicole Kidman performance. Kidman is constantly expressive and evolving throughout as she grows from a grieving defeated persona into a resourceful survivalist fighting for her life. Neil and Zane are good also, Zane’s take on his character is interesting though. I might argue Zane a bit over the top at times, but it honestly feels more manically on point. The situation and story is executed in a grounded and plausible way too(save arguably a moment or 2), generating a bit more kudos from me. And the twists and turns continually keep the film intriguing and heightened. Altogether a nice tight thriller.

Mark of the Vampire (1935)
2.50 out of 4stars

“Sir Karell Borotyn is found murdered in his house with two tiny pinpoint wounds on his neck. The attending doctor is convinced that he was killed by a vampire, but the Prague Police Inspector Neumann refuses to believe it.”
A good mystery horror film from Browning, Lugosi, Barrymore, and company that covers well worn vampire material for the most part. It’s still a short (60minutes) fun film, but a bit all over the place. Part campy/hammy/over-the-top, part serious/eerie, a very thin story, and features a couple of notably controversial twists which I liked. Well acted across the board with great set-pieces. Nothing memorable minus the ending, but definitely low-ball entertaining fun.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
I am suspicious that you hate Gary Busey…



Awhile back Kihei got me to watch ‘the worst movie ever made’, so no experience will ever top that.

That uh, film.. was so bad I can’t even remember the name.

Think it was royal people doing all this bad shit to their slaves.

The experience made me question my life choices that had brought me to that lowly place.
You have achieved a sliver of revenge, anyway. I can't for the life of me remember a movie like that. I've gone through my decidedly brief list of "royalty being, er, not nice" movies and all I came up with that I really liked were A Royal Affair; The Portuguese Woman,The Death of Louis IV; The Princess of Montpensier; Zama; and Farewell, My Queen (sort of). Can you remember anything else at all about the movie? I don't want to make you relive this obviously life-altering, traumatic experience, but I'd love to figure out the name of the movie.

Later: Could it have been a sex farce called The Little Hours?
 
Last edited:

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
intro-1658424621.jpg


All Quiet on the Western Front (2022) Directed by Edward Berger 3B

This remake of a classic anti-war film, perhaps the classic anti-war film, has more problems than a python with arthritis. Erich Maria Remarq;ue's All Quiet on the Western Front, about a group of patriotic young men who go off to war only to be slaughtered, was first made into a movie in 1930, and today that film is still a powerful testimony to the brutality and futility of war. It is most remembered for its haunting closing shot of a soldier (Lew Ayers) reaching for a butterfly just before he is killed, one of the most iconic images in movie history. This German remake has no such power and no such poetry. In the remake, Paul Baumer takes over the role played by Ayers so memorably in the original. Baumer is less than a cypher. In fact. he is a black hole in the centre of the screen from whom no light nor energy emerges. Then there is a completely invented subplot about a German diplomat trying to be a good guy. Every time the battle sequences are interrupted by this silly attempt to soften German aggression during World War I, the movie completely loses the focus on the original story. Then there is all the graphic CGI carnage that looks incredibly inferior when compared to war movies that don't use it, like Come and See, Ivan's Childhood, Saving Private Ryan, Paths of Glory and so on. If you are going to remake a classic, you need to do a much better job than this.

subtitles
 
Last edited:

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,785
4,918
intro-1658424621.jpg


All Quiet on the Western Front (2022) Directed by Edward Berger 3B

This remake of a classic anti-war film, perhaps the classic anti-war film, has more problems than a python with arthritis. Erich Maria Remarq;ue's All Quiet on the Western Front, about a group of patriotic young men who go off to war only to be slaughtered, was first made into a movie in 1930, and today that film is still a powerful testimony to the brutality and futility of war. It is most remembered for its haunting closing shot of a soldier (Lew Ayers) reaching for a butterfly just before he is killed, one of the most iconic images in movie history. This German remake has no such power and no such poetry. In the remake, Paul Baumer takes over the role played by Ayers so memorably in the original. Baumer is less than a cypher. In fact. he is a black hole in the centre of the screen from whom no light nor energy emerges. Then there is a completely invented subplot about a German diplomat trying to be a good guy. Every time the battle sequences are interrupted by this silly attempt to soften German aggression during World War I, the movie completely loses the focus on the original story. Then there is all the graphic CGI carnage that looks incredibly inferior when compared to war movies that don't use it, like Come and See, Ivan's Childhood, Saving Private Ryan, Paths of Glory and so on. If you are going to remake a classic, you need to do a much better job than this.

subtitles

Scratch my head sometimes when classics are remade. Seems like there are many films I`ve seen on interesting topics that I felt could have been better but aren`t attempted again.

The original is a personal favorite, re-watched it not long ago and still find it a profound film. The scene in the shell hole of opposing sides encapsulates war for me. Having to kill someone you don`t hate, who like you, is probably someone that just wants to get back to their family. Read a biography on Lee Marvin where he had a similar experience in the Pacific which deeply moved him (interesting that one of his favorire actors was Toshiro Mifune)..

Appreciate the heads up on this remake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kihei

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,914
10,796
The original is a personal favorite, re-watched it not long ago and still find it a profound film. The scene in the shell hole of opposing sides encapsulates war for me. Having to kill someone you don`t hate, who like you, is probably someone that just wants to get back to their family. Read a biography on Lee Marvin where he had a similar experience in the Pacific which deeply moved him (interesting that one of his favorire actors was Toshiro Mifune)..
You've seen Hell in the Pacific, I imagine. I didn't realize when I watched it that Marvin served in the Pacific and greatly admired Mifune, as you said, and pulled his weight in Hollywood in order to get the movie made. I might've appreciated it even more. I should probably re-watch it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chili and kihei

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,914
10,796
pearl1.jpg


Pearl (2022) - 7/10

During WWI, a young woman (Mia Goth) gets increasingly frustrated with being trapped on her family farm with her controlling mother and ailing father and aims to escape to star in moving pictures. I didn't quite like Ti West's X (which I gave a 5/10), so I'm surprised at how much I liked his prequel, which is an origin story for the character of Pearl. Whereas X is more of a slasher and clearly inspired by Texas Chain Saw Massacre, Pearl is a Stephen King-like horror and more suspenseful, twisted and dramatic. I was afraid that Mia Goth couldn't carry the film by herself, but, boy, did I underestimate her. She gives a committed performance that might be worthy of an Oscar nomination. In fact, it reminded me of Kathy Bates' performance in Misery. There's one standout scene in which she impressively delivers an emotional monologue for 5 straight minutes without a camera cut. It was mesmerizing. In general, she really conveys the conflict and pain that Pearl feels and makes her sympathetic even though she's not so innocent. In addition to the acting, I really liked the cinematography, camerawork and deliberate "Technicolor" look of the film that, combined with the plot, made it feel like I was watching a twisted spin on The Wizard of Oz. In all, the aesthetic of the film is very attractive. If I have one criticism, it's that the conclusion isn't as strong as I would've liked, but I can forgive that and it does have the most disturbing end credits that I've seen. Fans of X who expect something similar may be disappointed by Pearl because it's different. It's slower, less amusing and less "fun." It's deeper, more emotional and more unsettling, though, so horror fans who didn't care for X might not want to skip it. I'm glad that I didn't because I liked it quite a bit better. In fact, I'm curious to watch X again to see if I appreciate it more with this extra backstory.
 
Last edited:

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
You have achieved a sliver of revenge, anyway. I can't for the life of me remember a movie like that. I've gone through my decidedly brief list of "royalty being, er, not nice" movies and all I came up with that I really liked were A Royal Affair; The Portuguese Woman,The Death of Louis IV; The Princess of Montpensier; Zama; and Farewell, My Queen (sort of). Can you remember anything else at all about the movie? I don't want to make you relive this obviously life-altering, traumatic experience, but I'd love to figure out the name of the movie.

Later: Could it have been a sex farce called The Little Hours?

I was never out for revenge, who doesn’t like Gary Busey?

He’s a national treasure.

We had a discussion several years back about the worst movie we had the displeasure of watching.

My details may be off about royalty, just what my mind conjured when I went back to that deep, dark place.

The plot… I don’t think there was even a plot… was basically about these people in power forcing these other people (slaves?) to do disgusting/ridiculous things.

In all fairness I recall you saying it was the worst movie you had ever seen, and you didn’t exactly encourage me to watch it - I did that out of curiosity (stupidity).

I didn’t get very far into the uh, film, and usually I’m pretty detailed when trying to recall a movie, but this one literally made my brain try to reset itself.
 
Last edited:

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,785
4,918
You've seen Hell in the Pacific, I imagine. I didn't realize when I watched it that Marvin served in the Pacific and greatly admired Mifune, as you said, and pulled his weight in Hollywood in order to get the movie made. I might've appreciated it even more. I should probably re-watch it.

Love that film. There were two endings shot, may like the one they did not use better.

This is from the book I read on Lee Marvin (Point Blank by Dwayne Epstein):

Marvin admired only a handful of other actors, and the one that towered above all was Japan's Toshiro Mifune. When Marvin was first married, "Lee and I always from the beginning, would see Japanese films," recalled Betty (his wife). He loved Toshiro Mifune so much. He used to call him on the phone. Couldn't understand a word of Japanese. Mifune spoke no English. It was just a joke. They'd have these long conversations, about what? He just adored him." Marvin himself expressed his admiration for Mifune by glowing, "This guy hypnotizes you with his genius. Those eyes! The battered samurai warrior standing alone, not wanting outside help."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Osprey

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,728
5,526
My Bloody Valentine (2009) - 5/10

Ten years after a Valentine's Day massacre, a mining town is again tormented by an unknown killer.

Jansen Ackles stars as Tom, the son of a mine owner in the town of Harmony. Tom causes an accident that results a miner named Harry Warden to go on a murderous rampage. Warden is shot by Sheriff Jim Burke (Tom Atkins) and disappears into the town mine, never to be seen again. Ten years later, Tom returns home after the passing of his father, and a series of brutal murders happen that match Warden's MO. Is Harry Warden still alive, or is this the work of a copycat?

My Bloody Valentine was directed by Patrick Lussier (Dracula 2000) and is a remake of a 1981 film of the same name. Aside from the mining town setting and the character of Harry Warden, this remake doesn't borrow much from the original, which makes it almost function as a sequel more than a remake.

The big appeal of this movie is that it was shot in 3D. I watched it in 2D, but you can tell the 3D scenes are very fun and well done. Unlike many 3D movies, the characters aren't poking/throwing random objects at the camera the entire movie. The 3D elements here are very fun, with some occasional cheese thrown in.

The plot is a different story. Like the original, the film is a whodunit; but unlike the original, it's not well done. The characters are trying to find out if Harry Warden has returned, but the film fails to properly set up many red herrings. Without spoiling it, the reveal was very unsatisfying because the movie misleads the audience in a very cheap way.

Another problem I found with this movie is that the characters are pretty bad. Mostly everyone is a huge jerk, and are constantly bickering. The melodrama is slathered on here, and it's really hard to care what's happening to these people (the exception is Tom Atkins', and that's just because he's Tom Atkins). To me, the film has a weird dynamic in that the exposition scenes take themselves very seriously, but the death scenes include a lot of comedy.

Overall, My Bloody Valentine is a popcorn movie. The plot is simple, but somehow manages to underwhelm. However, the brutal kills filmed in 3D still add entertainment value to this one, making it a decent movie to watch with a group of friends. My Bloody Valentine was a pretty big hit, making over $100M against a $15M budget.


Graveyard Shift (1990) - 5/10

A textile mill with a rat problem is hiding an even darker secret in the basement.

David Andrews stars as John, a drifter who applies for a cotton picker job working for jerky, womanizing foreman Warwick (Stephen Macht). Due to a rat infestation and a series of mysterious deaths, an exterminator named Cleveland (Brad Dourif) is called in to take care of the problem. However, one night during a basement clean up, the crew discovers the problem is far worse than they could've imagined...

Graveyard Shift was directed by Ralph S. Singleton in his only film credit behind the camera, and is based on a Stephen King short story of the same name. Stephen King disliked this adaptation, calling it a "quick exploitation picture". Though I don't necessarily disagree, I think there are some things to like here.

The biggest thing this movie has going for it are the performances by Brad Dourif and Stephen Macht. Both actors have very memorable scenes, and ham things up just enough to be entertaining. Additionally, the plot is also easy to follow, making the movie very watchable.

On the flip side, the characters outside of Cleveland and Warwick mostly stink. Most of the mill workers are jerks, with the personalities of High School bullies. The main character, John, is extremely bland with few character traits or backstory. Why are we supposed to care about him? He's just some guy.

There's a romance subplot between John and a character named Jane (Kelly Wolf). But again, who cares? It's obvious they just needed to pad the run time to fill out this Stephen King adapted "short" story, which mostly takes place in the basement of the mill. Fortunately, the scenes in the basement are pretty decent, with a couple good gore effects. However, without getting into spoilers, the film and short story have different endings, and the short story's ending is far superior.

Overall, Graveyard shift is a movie that's just kinda there. It's an easy watch that is very forgettable, but the movie does have a little cachet thanks to the solid performances of Dourif and Macht.
 

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
The Banshees of Inisherin (2022)
3.60 out of 4stars

“In 1923 during the Irish civil war, two lifelong friends find themselves at an impasse when one abruptly ends their relationship, with alarming consequences for both of them.”
An excellent black comedy drama that is poetically human, universally relatable, and reflective of how we interact with others, especially the most meaningful people in our lives. It’s surprisingly deep and thought provoking alongside its audience inducing self-reflective elements. Aside from the main storyline messaging how we can thoroughly hurt people with dissociation and silence, or selfishness and rejection in seemingly oblivious or innocuous ways, the film has much more on its mind. Minor themes of meaning, self-worth, responsibility, kindness, dullness, dimness, sophistication, intelligence, loneliness, and value are covered. The film feels like gospel on small scale human interaction and its power and consequences, with both real deep meaning and irrationality brought about from the emotional power of it all. The film also brings up many important questions on topics of the existential, societal, familial, additionally interpersonal, and metaphorically political. And of course, this is McDonagh’s funniest film since In Bruges, topping itself off with more entertainment merits. Finding humor out of darkness with honest sharp wit and absurdity. Colin Farrell deserves his first oscar nomination here with the best performance of his career, and has already won at least one film festival award for this turn. I still feel I am not doing this film the entirety of justice it deserves with this review that I can't put words to right now.

Tar (2022)
3.35 out of 4stars

“Lydia Tár, a groundbreaking conductor of a major German Orchestra, is at the height of her career, as she's preparing both a book launch and much-anticipated live performance of Mahler's Fifth Symphony. Over the ensuing weeks, we see her life as it currently is and as it begins to unravel. The peak and the fall.”
An excellent psychological drama that is a character study of a sly egomaniac. Just give Cate Blanchette the oscar now, her commitment for the role and through the role is nothing short of brilliant. She commands the screen, delivers long takes and monologues/dialogues to perfection, expresses intelligence and dominance with ease, and brings complex layers of emotion. Tar is expertly conveyed as the ferocious power-driven genius she is without ever getting close to going over the top, as is her downfall. The film itself is a bit of a slow burn at over 2 and half hours, especially the first third to half, doing lots of legwork to set-up the life Blanchette currently is master of and living in. The major themes seem to be about cancel culture, positions of power, and morality. No judgment from me, but the film appears to show that Tar herself is a product of and victim to “transactional relationships”, as are many people that are in positions of power amongst the political and professional (and personal) world. Favors of all kinds, generally mutually beneficial in some ways, have occurred and will continue to occur until the end of time in both immoral and illegal ways. Lines are obviously crossed, but when does it become an abuse of power and when do these relationships become compromised, partial, emotionally involved, or “too far”? Or even at what point does the bending of “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” philosophy of ethics become broken in half? I won’t ruin anything, but you will see what I mean by this and the world it exists in from the film. The separation of a man’s accomplishments and works from their personal life/views when viewing their works is also a topic brought up, AKA seeing one’s productions and accomplishments for what they are at face value and taking their personal character flaws and sins and views completely out of the equation. The film is surprisingly informative at times also on its subject matter, and it gave me a deeper appreciation of the classical/composition medium. The film does not feel easy to take in though, for some reason that I can’t pinpoint. I don’t know if it’s the pacing, or tone, or all the above, but something makes this feel like a B or C on the Kihei scale of ease of understanding/enjoying the material.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
I was never out for revenge, who doesn’t like Gary Busey?

He’s a national treasure.

We had a discussion several years back about the worst movie we had the displeasure of watching.

My details may be off about royalty, just what my mind conjured when I went back to that deep, dark place.

The plot… I don’t think there was even a plot… was basically about these people in power forcing these other people (slaves?) to do disgusting/ridiculous things.

In all fairness I recall you saying it was the worst movie you had ever seen, and you didn’t exactly encourage me to watch it - I did that out of curiosity (stupidity).

I didn’t get very far into the uh, film, and usually I’m pretty detailed when trying to recall a movie, but this one literally made my brain try to reset itself.
Oh, that's a bit of a different spin. The only movie that fits that description for me is Michael Haneke;s Funny Games, about two young sadists who take part in a home invasion and put the family through hell. No real plot, just the sadism. While I did find the film an ugly effort, it wouldn't be a film I hate or think is the worst I have ever seen. But I was certainly not a fan of it.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
Just out of my own curiosity I tried to come up with my ten worst movies ever:

No particular order, just off the top of my head

Teorema
Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom
Forest Gump
El Topo
Requiem for a Dream
Magnolia
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
Rocky
Going My Way
9 1/2 Week

subject to change, of course, as memory kicks in
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
Just out of my own curiosity I tried to come up with my ten worst movies ever:

No particular order, just off the top of my head

Teorema
Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom
Forest Gump
El Topo
Requiem for a Dream
Magnolia
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
Rocky
Going My Way
9 1/2 Week

subject to change, of course, as memory kicks in

There it is… “Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom”

I was sure the title had Sodom in it, but kept searching for films in the 60s to try and find this misery again.

So then I started to doubt myself until I saw your post.

I read the synopsis and it said:

“A group of fascists round up nine adolescent boys and girls and subject them to a 120 days of physical, mental, and sexual torture.”

So the royal/slaves things I misremembered must have thrown you off.

Apparently it was fascists and adolescents.

I believe the setting was in a palace correct? That may be why I thought it was a bunch of royal people… granted I didn’t watch the whole god awful shitty mess to the end though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pink Mist and kihei

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,981
2,900
Just out of my own curiosity I tried to come up with my ten worst movies ever:

No particular order, just off the top of my head

Teorema
Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom
Forest Gump
El Topo
Requiem for a Dream
Magnolia
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
Rocky
Going My Way
9 1/2 Week

subject to change, of course, as memory kicks in
Of course, three films I like very much, four if you include Rocky. I should watch 9 1/2 weeks again, but I probably like it too. I know I've seen Magnolia, don't remember it much, rather disliked Forrest Gump and Requiem for a Dream, and haven't seen the other two.
 

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,785
4,918
a_night_to_remember_disc01-10.jpg

A Night To Remember-1958

Retelling of the Titantic story, without the big names, Alot of focus on historical accuracy. Gripping as the night unfolds. Was big budget, thousands would have been involved, impressive large scale mock up of the ship was built. First rate.

donJuan-warner.jpg

Don Juan-1926

The life of the legendary lover with an interesting twist, the setting is Rome in the time of the Borgias. Well written i.e.'Don Juan's home: Where innocence may enter but never depart'. Some good humour early in the film. Impressive sets & costumes, music by The New York Philharmonic Orchestra in the first film with synchronized sound. Strong cast led by John Barrymore as Don Juan, especially enjoyed Estelle Taylor as the scheming temptress Lucretia Borgia and lovely young Mary Astor as Don Juan's main love interest Adriana, the damsel in distress. Well done.

merlin_165536940_fd82ff04-04a8-4bbe-8604-6e22c8dc63a2-articleLarge.jpg

Richard Jewell-2019

A true story from the 1996 Atlanta Olympic games bombing. A security guard becomes a hero when he discovers a bomb and saves lives by helping secure the immediate area. Until he becomes the suspect. Uncanny how much the actor playing Richard Jewell looks like the real guy. Have been a fan of Sam Rockwell since Box of Moonlight, he's very good here as Richard Jewell's lawyer. Compelling story, well told.

Each-Dawn-I-Die-James-Cagney-George-Raft.jpg

Each Dawn I Die-1939

A journalist (James Cagney) who uncovers some shady dealings of a district attorney is framed and sent to prison. He befriends a crime boss (George Raft) who becomes a good ally to have. Raft especially shines as the prisoners try to deal with some abusive treatment. Good prison film, Raft & Cagney who were off screen friends have nice chemistry here.

sleuth3.jpg

Sleuth-1972

A bizarre type of story as a mystery writer (Laurence Olivier) summons his wife's lover (Michael Caine) to his estate. It's mostly friendly as they verbally spar and Olivier's character talks Caine into a plot to steal his wife's jewelry. A number of plot twists from there. The estate is filled with oddities, from one of those maze hedges outdoors to laughing props indoors. Reminded me of Michael Douglas' film The Game. Caine and Olivier are the only actors, no surprise they are both good. Filled my creepy film quota for Hallow'een.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan and Osprey

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,914
10,796
Sleuth-1972

A bizarre type of story as a mystery writer (Laurence Olivier) summons his wife's lover (Michael Caine) to his estate. It's mostly friendly as they verbally spar and Olivier's character talks Caine into a plot to steal his wife's jewelry. A number of plot twists from there. The estate is filled with oddities, from one of those maze hedges outdoors to laughing props indoors. Reminded me of Michael Douglas' film The Game. Caine and Olivier are the only actors, no surprise they are both good. Filled my creepy film quota for Hallow'een.
There's a 2007 remake that also stars Caine, but this time in Olivier's role. It's a rather inferior film, though, and I wouldn't bother unless that role reversal interests you (like it did me). There's also 1982's Deathtrap, which is unrelated, but has a similar plot and also stars Caine (he must really like this type of story). I do recommend that one because it's smart and twisty and also has Christopher Reeve.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chili

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,785
4,918
There's a 2007 remake that also stars Caine, but this time in Olivier's role. It's quite an inferior film, though, and I wouldn't bother unless that role reversal interests you. There's also 1982's Deathtrap, which is unrelated, but has a very similar plot and also stars Caine (he must really like this type of story). I do recommend that film.
I haven't seen the remake, have started to avoid them, Watched a trifecta of meh awhile ago (the remakes of The Ladykillers, All the King's Men & Nightmare Alley). And I love the originals, although that probably doesn't help. Pretty sure I haven't seen Deathtrap, may check it out. When I think of bad films and Michael Caine, first one that comes to mind is The Island. Real bad. Guess most actors have some forgettable films on their list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osprey

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
27,246
16,079
Montreal, QC
Just out of my own curiosity I tried to come up with my ten worst movies ever:

No particular order, just off the top of my head

Teorema
Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom
Forest Gump
El Topo
Requiem for a Dream
Magnolia
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
Rocky
Going My Way
9 1/2 Week

subject to change, of course, as memory kicks in

That list feels more personal than technical but all movie-watching is personal. :laugh:

--

Saw the new Martin McDonagh flick. Will post a review tomorrow or Monday (will probably catch Tar that day, surprised only one poster has reviewed it).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,914
10,796
I haven't seen the remake, have started to avoid them, Watched a trifecta of meh awhile ago (the remakes of The Ladykillers, All the King's Men & Nightmare Alley). And I love the originals, although that probably doesn't help. Pretty sure I haven't seen Deathtrap, may check it out. When I think of bad films and Michael Caine, first one that comes to mind is The Island. Real bad. Guess most actors have some forgettable films on their list.
Jaws: The Revenge. IMDb: 3.0/10. RT: 0%. "I have never seen it, but by all accounts it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built, and it is terrific." - Michael Caine
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
There's a 2007 remake that also stars Caine, but this time in Olivier's role. It's a rather inferior film, though, and I wouldn't bother unless that role reversal interests you (like it did me). There's also 1982's Deathtrap, which is unrelated, but has a similar plot and also stars Caine (he must really like this type of story). I do recommend that one because it's smart and twisty and also has Christopher Reeve.
Sleuth was originally a stage play and a very successful one. I always wondered how a live audience could possibly suspend disbelief throughout the course of the play, especially when there were only two actors in the programme. Then when Sleuth became a movie, I wondered how people could suspend disbelief when they were staring at gigantic close ups of the actors on a big screen. Then I got old enough to stop wondering about people's wilful gullibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osprey

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,872
11,143
Toronto
Jaws: The Revenge. IMDb: 3.0/10. RT: 0%. "I have never seen it, but by all accounts it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built, and it is terrific." - Michael Caine
Love that quote.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad