Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
Nocturnal Animals (2016)
3.45 out of 4stars

“A successful Los Angeles art-gallery owner is shaken by the arrival of a manuscript written by her first husband, with whom she is estranged. As Susan reads the book it destabilizes her life, upending her present while it forces her to examine her past and confront some dark truths.”
An excellent neo-noir psychological thriller that is deep and symbolic while bringing style, atmosphere, and darkly captivating entertainment. Kudos to zombie kopitar for reminding me of this movie I’ve put off for too long. While on the surface it’s a movie about tragedy, trauma, and revenge/justice, and a great one at that, the film is deeper than that. It’s about the corruption of one’s self from the pressures of capitalism, media, and society (and arguably family here too). We lose sight of our true selves in an environment that “brainwashes” us to make as much money as we can, buy as many nice things as we can, and to ourselves become and marry the most wealthy and beautiful people we can find. Behind the scenes of this surface level idealism for some can be an empty and depressive immoral problem-ladened nightmare, especially if one takes drastic and harsh steps to get to that position. Coming full circle, the harm and evil from those steps can cause lingering profound pain that manifests in its victims, even if the perpetrator tries to repress or forget them. Every scene is filled with meaning, and all are well acted across the board. And there is the whole meta-ness of art being self-expression as it reminds us that while we are being entertained watching this film: the creation of this movie, of the novel in the movie, and of the art gallery in the movie, are all purpose driven mind fabricated entities. Now, I feel if I start explaining all the meanings and symbolism of the story within the story, which are very smart and smooth and powerful, I know I will ruin the film and likely write an essay’s length of words, so I shall stop here. By all means, this is an engaging and thought provoking film that has a lot to offer.

Safe (1995)
3.00 out of 4stars

“In 1987, an upper class suburban housewife named Carol in Los Angeles has her monotonous life abruptly changed when she becomes sick with a mysterious illness caused by the environment all around her.”
A great psychological drama nightmare with an ambiguous slow burn approach that is quietly unsettling no matter what way you interpret it. While we get no definitive answer or diagnosis on what our protagonist is actually dealing with affliction wise, the film is more about Carol’s life and symptoms “and” how she is trying to deal with it and how the world suggests her to deal with it. Carol is in a living hell because of a possible or self-created illness and fear of said illness that can strike her paralyzed or even possibly kill her at any moment. Because of that “Carol is allergic to almost everything” indirectly or directly and her mind almost constantly races defensively on this, and understandably so given those circumstances. Carol herself and projections from other’s make her seek out medical practitioners, psychologists, allergy specialists, holistic and alternative medicine practitioners, treatment centers, and a health retreat that I would consider “rehab-esque” with self-help advisors. I will not tell you how Carol’s tale goes exactly, but I took the message from the film as no matter what you are dealing with or going through, a positive/self-loving/self-forgiving and accepting mindset can help lower one’s misery. As far as Carol’s symptoms go, they can be interpreted as psychosomatic, a different psychological disorder/mental illness, severe allergies, or some real undiagnosed condition created from the effects of new unknown pollutants/chemicals. There seems to also be social commentary on the upper class and the monotony of life alongside all the medical/psychological/industrial commentary. Julianne Moore is perfect in the role.

No Exit (2022)
2.70 out of 4stars

“During a blizzard and stranded at an isolated highway rest stop in the mountains, a recovering drug addict discovers a kidnapped child hidden in a car belonging to one of the people inside.”
A good enough thriller mystery that delivers good twists and lots of good tension 1 setting movie, but repeatedly evades becoming a great movie. I forgot who posted a review on this, and the search function didn’t help, but I think they were spot on with their review. While it’s nothing world changing, on its purpose of popcorn entertainment pretty well over the last 2/3 of the movie. It’s well acted and well directed too, but feels lacking in a few obvious areas. For those curious going in, I’d say the dialogue is subpar, main mystery gets broken 30minutes in so there isn’t too much mystery going on aside from the revolving door of new twists (which does create a “what will happen next” kind of vibe still amongst the tense situations), and the story, aside from being unbelievable, feels a bit choppy.
 

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,692
5,431
Friday the 13th (2009) - 6/10

In this series remake/reboot, Jason Voorhees stalks a group of young adults vacationing at Crystal Lake. Meanwhile, a man searches for his sister who went missing in the area six weeks earlier.

Friday the 13th '09 goes back to basics and succeeds because of it. We're back at Crystal Lake for the first time since 1987's Friday the 13th Part VII, and Jason is the killer with no gimmicks attached (i.e. no body swapping or outer space adventures).

This movie is said to be a remake of the original, and I've seen many fans say it's really a remake of Parts 1 & 2. I actually think it's a remake of the first four movies, which feel like they're all put in a blender here:
  • We get a three minute black & white recap of Part 1 during the opening credits.
  • Jason wears a tater sack-looking piece of headgear for part of the movie, and believes one character looks like his mother, just like in Part 2.
  • The main cast are staying in a big vacation house and Jason gets his hockey mask, just like in Part 3.
  • One of the main characters is searching for his missing sister, just like in Part 4.
One thing F13 '09 does to feel unique is give us a different spin to Jason. First off, he's huge and sprints at full speed. Second off, he uses lots of traps to aid him (flood lights, tunnels, bear traps, etc.). These changes give the movie a different flavor and make it stand out more.

The characters are a mixed bag. The leads - Clay, Jenna, and Whitney - are solid characters that are given some depth. The rest of the characters, led by low-rent Tom Cruise with surfer hair, mostly only have on character trait: "douchebag". I think it hurts the movie somewhat because there are several characters you actively dislike, and the moments you're left alone with them drag a bit.

This movie was written by the same team who wrote Freddy vs Jason, by the way. Though we don't get a masterclass in writing, they still did a much better job here. Also worth mentioning: this was a joint New Line Cinema-Paramount production, with Paramount holding the rights to the "Friday" title, even though they had loaned (leased?) New Line the Jason character several times.

F13 '09 does pretty well in the suspense department; it does a good job building tension, and there are some decent jump scares. However, I thought there was one-too-many "fake out" jump scares for my liking, and a couple pretty bad shaky cam moments.

There was on extreme spoiler I found funny: After Clay and sister Whitney are re-united, Jenna - the main heroine for 90% of the movie - is unceremoniously killed by Jason. It's jarring both because you don't expect it to happen, and it doesn't "feel" like a big twist, if that makes sense. The movie just needed her out of the way because her replacement (Whitney) was back in the movie. The remaining characters don't even seem to care all that much.

Overall, it's a decent entry to the series - and to date, the last. This is the film in the series I've seen by far the fewest times (I believe this was only my second viewing), but I need to return to this one more often.

And with that... Jason no longer haunts me. I'm done with this series for another summer.

Here's my tier list after this re-watch:

TierFilm
Masterpiece
Great
Above AverageFriday the 13th (1980)
Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981)
Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter (1984)
Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives (1986)
Average/OkayFriday the 13th Part 3 (1982)
Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning (1985)
Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood (1987)
Friday the 13th (2009)
Below Average/Mediocre
BadFriday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan (1989)
Jason X (2001)
Freddy vs Jason (2003)
AwfulJason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday (1992)

F13Pt5B.png
 

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,954
2,848
Friday the 13th (2009) - 6/10

In this series remake/reboot, Jason Voorhees stalks a group of young adults vacationing at Crystal Lake. Meanwhile, a man searches for his sister who went missing in the area six weeks earlier.

Friday the 13th '09 goes back to basics and succeeds because of it. We're back at Crystal Lake for the first time since 1987's Friday the 13th Part VII, and Jason is the killer with no gimmicks attached (i.e. no body swapping or outer space adventures).

This movie is said to be a remake of the original, and I've seen many fans say it's really a remake of Parts 1 & 2. I actually think it's a remake of the first four movies, which feel like they're all put in a blender here:
  • We get a three minute black & white recap of Part 1 during the opening credits.
  • Jason wears a tater sack-looking piece of headgear for part of the movie, and believes one character looks like his mother, just like in Part 2.
  • The main cast are staying in a big vacation house and Jason gets his hockey mask, just like in Part 3.
  • One of the main characters is searching for his missing sister, just like in Part 4.
One thing F13 '09 does to feel unique is give us a different spin to Jason. First off, he's huge and sprints at full speed. Second off, he uses lots of traps to aid him (flood lights, tunnels, bear traps, etc.). These changes give the movie a different flavor and make it stand out more.

The characters are a mixed bag. The leads - Clay, Jenna, and Whitney - are solid characters that are given some depth. The rest of the characters, led by low-rent Tom Cruise with surfer hair, mostly only have on character trait: "douchebag". I think it hurts the movie somewhat because there are several characters you actively dislike, and the moments you're left alone with them drag a bit.

This movie was written by the same team who wrote Freddy vs Jason, by the way. Though we don't get a masterclass in writing, they still did a much better job here. Also worth mentioning: this was a joint New Line Cinema-Paramount production, with Paramount holding the rights to the "Friday" title, even though they had loaned (leased?) New Line the Jason character several times.

F13 '09 does pretty well in the suspense department; it does a good job building tension, and there are some decent jump scares. However, I thought there was one-too-many "fake out" jump scares for my liking, and a couple pretty bad shaky cam moments.

There was on extreme spoiler I found funny: After Clay and sister Whitney are re-united, Jenna - the main heroine for 90% of the movie - is unceremoniously killed by Jason. It's jarring both because you don't expect it to happen, and it doesn't "feel" like a big twist, if that makes sense. The movie just needed her out of the way because her replacement (Whitney) was back in the movie. The remaining characters don't even seem to care all that much.

Overall, it's a decent entry to the series - and to date, the last. This is the film in the series I've seen by far the fewest times (I believe this was only my second viewing), but I need to return to this one more often.

And with that... Jason no longer haunts me. I'm done with this series for another summer.

Here's my tier list after this re-watch:

TierFilm
Masterpiece
Great
Above AverageFriday the 13th (1980)
Friday the 13th Part 2 (1981)
Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter (1984)
Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives (1986)
Average/OkayFriday the 13th Part 3 (1982)
Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning (1985)
Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood (1987)
Friday the 13th (2009)
Below Average/Mediocre
BadFriday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan (1989)
Jason X (2001)
Freddy vs Jason (2003)
AwfulJason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday (1992)

F13Pt5B.png
It is indeed a remake of the first 4 films, all of them being way better than this "cool" reboot. I hate it. Jason as a weed farmer is the dumbest thing they could have come up with (be it actually what he's supposed to be or not, the whole film implies that he is). Only based on memory, so needing quite a few tweeks, I'd go with:

1) Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter
-
2) Friday the 13th part 3D
3) Friday the 13th part II
4) Friday the 13th
-
T-5) Friday the 13th part VII: The New Blood
T-5) Friday the 13th part VI: Jason Lives
-
-
7) Freddy vs Jason
8) Friday the 13th part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
9) Friday the 13th 2009
10) Friday the 13th part V: A New Beginning
-
11) Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
12) Jason X

I actually think part 4 is one of the very best formulaic slashers of the 80s, probably second to Halloween II only, and just above the cult favorites The Burning, and The Prowler (another Joseph Zito film). Now, most of these films look pale if you compare them to gialli with similar formulas or to other films that are considered to be early influences on the genre.
 
Last edited:

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,692
5,431
It is indeed a remake of the first 4 films, all of them being way better than this "cool" reboot. I hate it. Jason as a weed farmer is the dumbest thing they could have come up with (be it actually what he's supposed to be or not, the whole film implies that he is). Only based on memory, so needing quite a few tweeks, I'd go with:

1) Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter
-
2) Friday the 13th part 3D
3) Friday the 13th part II
4) Friday the 13th
-
T-5) Friday the 13th part VII: The New Blood
T-5) Friday the 13th part VI: A New Beginning
-
-
7) Freddy vs Jason
8) Friday the 13th part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
9) Friday the 13th 2009
-
10) Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
11) Jason X

I actually think part 4 is one of the very best formulaic slashers of the 80s, probably second to Halloween II only, and just above the cult favorites The Burning, and The Prowler (another Joseph Zito film). Now, most of these films look pale if you compare them to gialli with similar formulas or to other films that are considered to be early influences on the genre.

You merged Part V and VI together, is it a 3-way tie for 5th?

The Final Chapter is definitely one of the best entries, if not the best. It basically has everything you could want from one of these movies. It has some great kills and Ted White plays a brutal Jason.

Regarding Jason as a weed farmer in F13 '09, I didn't even pick up on that. I thought the other character who was using the wood chipper was the guy growing the weed, but I could be wrong.
 

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,954
2,848
You merged Part V and VI together, is it a 3-way tie for 5th?

The Final Chapter is definitely one of the best entries, if not the best. It basically has everything you could want from one of these movies. It has some great kills and Ted White plays a brutal Jason.

Regarding Jason as a weed farmer in F13 '09, I didn't even pick up on that. I thought the other character who was using the wood chipper was the guy growing the weed, but I could be wrong.
Oh no no, I meant part VI and then forgot to rank part 5... nah, not a fan of part 5, it would go down pretty much a tie with the reboot. I'll edit it!

As for the weed, you're right of course, but the film kind of implies Jason is just getting rid of the competition. He is way too well organized to just be the f***tard serial killer he's supposed to be (tunnels, really? That's Texas Chainsaw 2's meat operation level of dumb). The weed farmer is a common joke about the movie.
 
  • Love
Reactions: shadow1

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,544
10,852
Toronto
Lunana-A-Yak-in-the-Classroom-Everett-MCDLUAY_SG005-H-2022.jpg


Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom
(2019) Directed by Pawo Choyning Dorji 7A

Nestled in the Himalayas. tiny Bhutan doesn't have much of a film industry. Seeing as there are only two movie theatres in the entire country, how could it? Writer/director Pawo Choyning Dorji realizes he is making a movie for an international festival/art house audience who probably knows more about Mars than they do about Bhutan. So he gives us a protagonist that we all can identify with: a grumpy millenial. Ugyen hates teaching and wants to immigrate to Australia and start a singing career. However, he is irrevocably committed to one more year of teaching, and because he is such a cheerless malcontent, his director sends him away from the capital city, Thimphu (population: 114,000) to far off Lunana (population: 55 residents), a three-day walk uphill, to teach the children of the area, all eight of them. The story has a comfortable familiarity--city mouse goes to the countryside and is forced to learn a thing or two about life. But the execution is both charmingly and tastefully done, two adverbs that don't necessarily always go together. The charm is unforced and natural, and conventional schlock moves are avoided entirely (well, the class captain is awfully cute)..Plus the scenery is sometimes breath-taking. It must have been a big, big deal last year in Bhutan when Lunana: A Yak in the Classroom was nominated for an Academy Award in the "international film" category. The movie fully earned and deserved the honour.

subtitles

Netflix
 
Last edited:

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,954
2,848
Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (Raimi, 2022) - Apart from me feeling really naive that I bought the "horror movie" marketing, making me want for some horror tropes and twists from Sam Raimi (and obviously making the whole thing unsatisfactory), it was kind of a fun ride. 4/10

Movie 43
(collective, 2013) - I had never seen this thing. Really uneven, really dumb reflexivity and really stupid humor. It seems many critics thought it was one of the worst films ever. I mean, it's juvenile penis-caca jokes one after the other, but some of them land (some sketches are just really bad though). It's funny that this is the last thing James Gunn did before exploding with Guardians of the Galaxy. I'm a Kentucky Fried Movie nostalgic I guess, and I appreciate the fact that it's daring and not involving Seth Rogen. 3.5/10

Deep Water
(Lyne, 2022) - Adrian Lyne is back after 20 years. The guy can make a fridge sexy, so he hits an easy homerun with Ana de Armas. The film itself is disappointing, not that I expected anything going in, but I thought the first hour was very interesting and intriguing. I really wished he'd gone in a totally different direction (and made better use of the snails also - on both thematic and visual levels), but it's a novel adaptation, so I guess I should blame the author. I'm pushing it by a point for what it could have been, and Lyne's return, something I had no idea I was hoping for. 5/10

Nope
(Peele, 2022) - Oh well... Peele has obvious talent, but I'm really not sure of the results. I thought Us could have been a great horror film (apart from the dumb interextuality), but it derailed in the second half, trying to do too much. It's a little of the same here. It feels like Get Out's overall critical reception put some pressure on Peele that his films should mean something, that he should have a discourse. Problem is, I don't think he has much to say. Lots of things (I can't even use the word ideas) in Nope about fame, spectacle, and the image, but the depth seems risible at best. It's Tremors from the sky with a social commentary ambition, but in the end, it's not much more than a very nice looking postmodern version of Tremors. 4/10
 
Last edited:

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,692
5,431
Too Scared to Scream (1984) - 2/10

Detectives hunt for a killer terrorizing women in a luxury high rise apartment.

I watched this movie on Amazon Prime after noticing its cover, which gave me Alice, Sweet Alice vibes. The Amazon synopsis - which made the movie sound like a cat & mouse game, which it isn't - led me to believe this could be a good horror mystery, maybe a Giallo-lite.

I'm not sure how to describe this movie (aside from bad!). It feels like a made-for-TV detective movie, which you'd swear it was except for the fact it contains excessive nudity. Too Scared to Scream has horror elements in it, but it's more of a badly set up mystery movie, in which 95% of the run time focuses on an obvious red herring. Other than pure luck, it's impossible to guess the killer or their motives. Personally I thought it was going to be the old woman in the wheel chair, as opposed to the random character who had two scenes in the first 30 minutes of the movie.

This movie has a strangely notable cast, including Anne Archer, John Heard, and Ian McShane. Mike Connors stars as the lead detective, and the movie makes a big deal about revealing his face; he gives an entire scene of exposition with his back to the camera, before revealing himself in a classic Hollywood turn. I assume this was at his own request, as he also produced.

Two other random thoughts: the mask on the poster doesn't appear in the movie, and the movie feels like it was made much earlier than 1984. It was filmed in 1982 and shelved for a few years, but that doesn't fully explain it.

Too Scared to Scream has a 5.0 on IMDB. Normally I'd say to take my review with a grain of salt, but considering it only has 702 reviews, I'm not going to say that here.
 

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,954
2,848
Too Scared to Scream (1984) - 2/10

Detectives hunt for a killer terrorizing women in a luxury high rise apartment.

I watched this movie on Amazon Prime after noticing its cover, which gave me Alice, Sweet Alice vibes. The Amazon synopsis - which made the movie sound like a cat & mouse game, which it isn't - led me to believe this could be a good horror mystery, maybe a Giallo-lite.

I'm not sure how to describe this movie (aside from bad!). It feels like a made-for-TV detective movie, which you'd swear it was except for the fact it contains excessive nudity. Too Scared to Scream has horror elements in it, but it's more of a badly set up mystery movie, in which 95% of the run time focuses on an obvious red herring. Other than pure luck, it's impossible to guess the killer or their motives. Personally I thought it was going to be the old woman in the wheel chair, as opposed to the random character who had two scenes in the first 30 minutes of the movie.

This movie has a strangely notable cast, including Anne Archer, John Heard, and Ian McShane. Mike Connors stars as the lead detective, and the movie makes a big deal about revealing his face; he gives an entire scene of exposition with his back to the camera, before revealing himself in a classic Hollywood turn. I assume this was at his own request, as he also produced.

Two other random thoughts: the mask on the poster doesn't appear in the movie, and the movie feels like it was made much earlier than 1984. It was filmed in 1982 and shelved for a few years, but that doesn't fully explain it.

Too Scared to Scream has a 5.0 on IMDB. Normally I'd say to take my review with a grain of salt, but considering it only has 702 reviews, I'm not going to say that here.
Sounds like something I'd watch late at night... :)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: OzzyFan and shadow1

Pranzo Oltranzista

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
3,954
2,848
La_piscine-388699084-large.jpg


La piscine (Deray, 1969) – Iconic French film, especially regarding Alain Delon's 60s sex-symbol stature, I needed to go back to it because it haunted another film I watched this week. I didn't realize it while watching Deep Water, but thinking about the movie, writing my comment here, I couldn't help but having faint flashbacks of La piscine (and there's indeed a lot of interesting intertexual links to be made – thematic, narrative, but also in the acting itself – the films should be watched together). Deray's film is not especially good, but it does have a great atmosphere and enjoyable pacing. I'd like to say that it's the very serious and dramatic variant of Blame It On Rio (which is not a diss, I'm one of the few who like that film!), but it's also darkened by links to another story, Alain Delon becoming, while filming, a person of interest in a murder investigation (and just like in most versions of the film – not true in the Spanish one which has a different ending, also available on the Criterion channel – that investigation will go unresolved, and like his character, Delon might have gotten away with it). I'm probably a little generous with this one too. 5.5/10


@shadow1
I need you to explain how you do your cute spoiler blur! - THANK YOU
 
Last edited:

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,692
5,431
La_piscine-388699084-large.jpg


La piscine (Deray, 1969) – Iconic French film, especially regarding Alain Delon's 60s sex-symbol stature, I needed to go back to it because it haunted another film I watched this week. I didn't realize it while watching Deep Water, but thinking about the movie, writing my comment here, I couldn't help but having faint flashbacks of La piscine (and there's indeed a lot of interesting intertexual links to be made – thematic, narrative, but also in the acting itself – the films should be watched together). Deray's film is not especially good, but it does have a great atmosphere and enjoyable pacing. I'd like to say that it's the very serious and dramatic variant of Blame It On Rio (which is not a diss, I'm one of the few who like that film!), but it's also darken by links to another story, Alain Delon becoming, while filming, a person of interest in a murder investigation (
and just like in most versions of the film – not true in the Spanish one which has a different ending, also available on the Criterion channel – that investigation will go unresolved, and like his character, Delon might have gotten away with it
). I'm probably a little generous with this one too. 5.5/10


@shadow1
I need you to explain how you do your cute spoiler blur!

There's a button that looks like a little Zorro mask called "inline spoiler"...ironically Alain Delon played Zorro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,692
5,431
Madman (1981) - 5/10

On the final night of summer camp, a group of counselors and campers accidentally summon legendary murderer Madman Marz.

Madman is a cult favorite amongst horror fans. I'd seen it before, but it had been a very long time and I could barely remember any of it. After this re-watch, I can partially see why.

The movie has a great opening scene. Counselors and campers are gathered around the camp fire telling scary stories. Max - the oldest counselor (mid-50's), played by Frederick Neumann - tells the story of local legend Madman Marz, and warns if you speak his name louder than a whisper, he'll come for you. Neumann's delivery of this monologue is excellent, and it creates great atmosphere early on.

Unfortunately, it's somewhat downhill from there. Madman has very slow pacing, and not much at all happens in the first 40 minutes (aside from the campfire scene). It's hard to explain, but there are a few scenes that feel like they last 30 seconds too long. The camera just kinda lingers.

Even when the movie gets going, it's still pretty slow; the characters aren't given a lot to do. One (very much alive, but very stupid) camper is missing, and the counselors - one by one - go looking for him, only to get killed. Otherwise, they don't do much, and there aren't really any subplots or character development. Max, the best character, isn't in most of the movie because he drives into town to play poker.

On the plus side of things, the kill scenes are pretty solid. One jump scare got me good (popcorn bowl flying in the air level) and it wasn't an unearned one. The most memorable scene is when one of the characters, while fleeing from the killer, decides to hide inside of a refrigerator; this was the scene I remembered from my previous viewing. Speaking of the killer, he's pretty cheesy looking; kinda like the Abominable Snowman.

I do think the atmosphere established early in the movie mostly holds up decently throughout the movie too. Even though it takes place at the end of summer camp, the movie was filmed in November and screams 'autumn'. Definitely a different feel than the Friday the 13th films.

There were some glaring technical issues in Madman, but I'll partially forgive those because I assume this movie was made for zero money. I couldn't find the budget anywhere, but I did find this was a non-SAG movie, which is why several of the actors used stage names in the credits (Dawn of the Dead's Gaylen Ross, who stars here in one of her only other film roles, is credited as 'Alexis Dubin'). This movie was written and director by Joe Giannone, and was his only credit before passing away in 2006. Though the movie is below average and flawed, I think he did a decent job all things considered.
 

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,773
4,893
Toronto
@kihei and/or others going to TIFF this year, whats on your list of films now that the official schedule is released? Going to TIFF in person for the first time this year and I'm trying to narrow down my list. Got a 6 pack of tickets but I'm almost certainly going to pick up more
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,544
10,852
Toronto
@kihei and/or others going to TIFF this year, whats on your list of films now that the official schedule is released? Going to TIFF in person for the first time this year and I'm trying to narrow down my list. Got a 6 pack of tickets but I'm almost certainly going to pick up more
My list consists of

Broker
Decision to Leave
Triangle of Sadness
The Banshees of Inisherin

No Bears
Holy Spider
Pacifiction.

I didn't buy tickets this year but I plan to rush seat at least the last three as, unlike the other ones, there is no guarantee that they will open in Toronto (though Panahi's No Bears is likely a safe bet). Hoping few play in the first week as that would put them in conflict with the US Open which is the bigger priority these days.
 

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,692
5,431
Edge of the Axe (1988) - 3/10

A small California town is terrorized by an axe murderer; a computer whizz new to the area romances a local college student; a young man and his older wife - who he openly married for her wealth - are facing marital troubles.

What happens when you mix War Games (1983), Dario Argento's Sleepless (2001), and say... Overboard (1987)? I guess I know now.

The Amazon Prime description claims the plot to be about computer whizz and his girlfriend seeking to unmask a killer, but that is absolutely not true. Though this film is technically a slasher-mystery, most of the run time focuses on the two romance plots, with scenes peppered in of the axe murderer killing people. The characters from both of the romance storylines personally discover some of the bodies, yet they barely seem to care that a killer is running loose. It almost feels like you're watching three different movies, and none of them are very good.

As far as the scenes with the killer, a couple of them were pretty cool; they definitely had a giallo feel to them. A couple of the kill scenes were also cheesy though, as the killer hits their victim with what is clearly a rubber axe. Visually the killer looks decent enough; basically a bald Michael Myers.

The ending? My god, is it bad. The computer whizz seems to be the killer. There is even a scene earlier in the movie in which the killer is unmasked in the shadows, and you can clearly tell it's him. Except it's not him! Apparently his girlfriend is crazy and was in a mental hospital for a few years, and all of the victims are people somehow connected to that experience. When computer whizz confronts her with this knowledge - thanks to deus ex machina computer - she claims he's gaslighting her and runs away; he chases and is gunned down by police. As girlfriend hugs the sheriff, an evil grin appears on her face. Roll credits. Plug nose. Pee-ew!

IMDB has this movie at a 5.3, but the first trivia item is how director Jose Ramon Larraz considers this his worst feature film. So if you don't make my word for it, you can take the director's.
 

Pink Mist

RIP MM*
Jan 11, 2009
6,773
4,893
Toronto
My list consists of

Broker
Decision to Leave
Triangle of Sadness
The Banshees of Inisherin

No Bears
Holy Spider
Pacifiction.

I didn't buy tickets this year but I plan to rush seat at least the last three as, unlike the other ones, there is no guarantee that they will open in Toronto (though Panahi's No Bears is likely a safe bet). Hoping few play in the first week as that would put them in conflict with the US Open which is the bigger priority these days.

Prettu good list. My preliminary list is:

Aftersun (really well reviewed at Cannes)
Broker
Decision to Leave
EO (interesting concept and won Jury Prize at Cannes)
Godland (loved directors first film Winter Brothers and think he's a rising star)
No Bears
One Fine Morning (Mia Hansen-Løve)
Pacifiction
Paris Memories (Alice Winocour)
RMN (Cristian Mungiu, director of 4 Months, 3 Weeks, Two Days)
The Banshees of Inisherin
Theatre of thought (Always interested in Werner Herzogs documentaries)

Also looking at the midnight madness release of Sisu since I feel obligated to support Finnish cinema

May also check out P***y (dunno if it'll get through the censors on HFboards, but slang for female genitals) since I met the director at a party a couple of weeks ago and didn't know until just now that they were a filmmaker or that they were having their first feature film debuting at TIFF, so now I feel I have to check it out
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kihei and OzzyFan

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,544
10,852
Toronto
Prettu good list. My preliminary list is:

Aftersun (really well reviewed at Cannes)
Broker
Decision to Leave
EO (interesting concept and won Jury Prize at Cannes)
Godland (loved directors first film Winter Brothers and think he's a rising star)
No Bears
One Fine Morning (Mia Hansen-Løve)
Pacifiction
Paris Memories (Alice Winocour)
RMN (Cristian Mungiu, director of 4 Months, 3 Weeks, Two Days)
The Banshees of Inisherin
Theatre of thought (Always interested in Werner Herzogs documentaries)

Also looking at the midnight madness release of Sisu since I feel obligated to support Finnish cinema

May also check out P***y (dunno if it'll get through the censors on HFboards, but slang for female genitals) since I met the director at a party a couple of weeks ago and didn't know until just now that they were a filmmaker or that they were having their first feature film debuting at TIFF, so now I feel I have to check it out
Good list. I flirted with the Hansen-Love, but the malcontent that lives inside my head went "Hey, do you really need another Hansen-Love movie?" And I thought "You know, that's a good point."

You obviously go to more interesting parties than I ever did.

Getting around censorship (and fines): After a botched line call in a heated match, Daniil Medvedev hilariously called the Chair Umpire "a little cat." His first language may be Russian, but he knew what he was doing.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad