Shaman464
No u
You don’t need to dumb it down because your understanding of asset management is poor. Larkin isn’t a jug of milk or a busted lathe. He’s a human under contract who has his own wants. He wants to win a Cup. He wants it enough to completely destroy his legacy in Detroit. So he wants to bad. Because he’s a human he has wants that can be used against him. Until he’s traded he has to report to LCA. And as his mangers Yzerman and McLellan are able to turn the screws on him to erode his demands. Without Larkin the team is likely already looking at a lottery season next year, them pushing Larkin down the lineup doesn’t change anything. And getting a top 3 pick next year is better for Detroit next year then trading Larkin for Trocheck plus some peanuts and being 12th worst in the league. So waiting for Larkin to soften his list because he he doesn’t want to humiliated and having one of his last prime years wasted is a real strategy.I’m not sure how to dumb this down any further.
Hockey GMs who tie up 9M in an asset and then decide to not play it aren’t usually effective or successful.
Let’s put this into other terms, you run a business and buy a 9M piece of machinery that you believe will help your business. Then you use it but find out that it’s not a fit for your operations. Based on what you suggest, you’d just go park it in the backlot and let it depreciate versus sending it out for auction or resale because your too proud to. Ok then.
Last edited:
