Matthew McConaughay
Registered User
- May 3, 2013
- 3,094
- 4,332
Hutson qb and Matheson right boards shooting was not bad looking at all.I really like him and Matheson together, i think both of them together on the first PP would do wonders.
It makes sense because we don't have four good forwards. Dach hasn't shown he's worth of pp1 and even slaf is struggling this year. Cole and Nick are the only real pp1 threats. The rest of the pp is cycling the puck for one of them to shoot. I think slaf may even lose that pp1 spot to Demidov as soon as next year.Hutson qb and Matheson right boards shooting was not bad looking at all.
Slaf in front, Coco left and Suzuki doing Suzuki things. PP2 would suck again though… You need D’s that can face top opposition on pp2 so Guhle fits there I guess. We never saw him on the pp he’s probably good at it.
Maybe even sooner than that when Laine comes back… But you need a front net presence, Slaf’s spot is safe for that reason alone.It makes sense because we don't have four good forwards. Dach hasn't shown he's worth of pp1 and even slaf is struggling this year. Cole and Nick are the only real pp1 threats. The rest of the pp is cycling the puck for one of them to shoot. I think slaf may even lose that pp1 spot to Demidov as soon as next year.
Suzuki hasn't been all that great on the PP either though. Suzuki has 1 more point than Dach and Slafkovsky.It makes sense because we don't have four good forwards. Dach hasn't shown he's worth of pp1 and even slaf is struggling this year. Cole and Nick are the only real pp1 threats. The rest of the pp is cycling the puck for one of them to shoot. I think slaf may even lose that pp1 spot to Demidov as soon as next year.
They need to play Hutson with CC a little more. Those passes will get buried.Yeah, he keeps finding open forwards and making sneaky, accurate passes. I'm going to wait a bit to see how the league adapts to his quick, jerky pivots, but this kid's obviously on a different tier than anyone else we've got.
If we had more players who could one-time Hutson's passes, he'd be leading all rookies in points.
While that may be true Nick is usually the one with the most touches on every PP and is the guy calling out to team mates to rotate. I would guess he probably leads the team in zone entries on the pp as well. I don't think they have any success if you take him off. I don't think there's a huge difference between a secondary or tertiary assist. One gets credited and sometimes you did nothing while tertiary assists never get credited and sometimes created the entire play or situation.Suzuki hasn't been all that great on the PP either though. Suzuki has 1 more point than Dach and Slafkovsky.
Matheson, Huston, Caufield, and Gallagher have been our best PP producers so far, outside of Dvorak and and Heineman who have under 15 minutes, so I didn't include them.
I just think he's been carried on the PP by Caufield's shot. Because in all honesty, our PP still looks like shit compared to when I watch other teams. We move the puck but never really open lanes. And everyone knows exactly what we're trying to do.While that may be true Nick is usually the one with the most touches on every PP and is the guy calling out to team mates to rotate. I would guess he probably leads the team in zone entries on the pp as well. I don't think they have any success if you take him off. I don't think there's a huge difference between a secondary or tertiary assist. One gets credited and sometimes you did nothing while tertiary assists never get credited and sometimes created the entire play or situation.
Love the moving goal posts.While that may be true Nick is usually the one with the most touches on every PP and is the guy calling out to team mates to rotate. I would guess he probably leads the team in zone entries on the pp as well. I don't think they have any success if you take him off. I don't think there's a huge difference between a secondary or tertiary assist. One gets credited and sometimes you did nothing while tertiary assists never get credited and sometimes created the entire play or situation.
It's all about getting engagement.I see that Snake Boisvert is back to attacking Habs fans for their Lane Hutson takes even though no Habs fans have ever claimed what he says.
I swear anytime Habs fans get excited about a prospect, it bothers him.
Sure but why not get engagement with actual topics your engaged on.It's all about getting engagement.
He easily could be. Especially since the Norris is mostly based on offense. Not like his D has been bad. Dude looks like an utter phenom out there.Sure but why not get engagement with actual topics your engaged on.
I don't know any Habs fans who called Hutson a Norris caliber Dman.
I am a big snake70 fan so I'll do him a favor here and as a Habs fan, I officially claim Hudson to be Norris caliber.I don't know any Habs fans who called Hutson a Norris caliber Dman.
The issue I have with him, is that he will have no issue sending flowers to his own personal crushes like Trevor Connelly, Quentin Musty and Conor Geekie but when it comes to prospects he had ranked lower he has to be very 'objective' sudenly and overly critical like with Beck and Hutson. He never liked them and he will never give them praise.I see that Snake Boisvert is back to attacking Habs fans for their Lane Hutson takes even though no Habs fans have ever claimed what he says.
I swear anytime Habs fans get excited about a prospect, it bothers him.
I am a big snake70 fan so I'll do him a favor here and as a Habs fan, I officially claim Hudson to be Norris caliber.