Or get that sorted out asap with Matheson Guhle Hutson playing lhd or something; Hutson looked anything but overwhelmed playing 2 high stakes nhl games.
Nice timing indeed if Reinbacher comes in for Matheson where Guhle slots in lhd. Leaves space for Xjekaj…
This is the most important point to think about. Ghule on the rigth side has to be a band aid only. Hutson starting in the NHL migth mean playing with 7 D.
There isn urgency, contrary towboat you suggest. What's your reasoning behind the urgency? Guhle's development will not be destroyed by playing the right side.
The urgency is that he isn't nearly as effective on his right side as he is on his left side. The goal is to develop Guhle into a top pairing dman and that only happens on his left side.
Guhle won't lose his abilities playing on the right side in the meantime's hesitation on D shakes out. After two more years, Guhle, as a D, will still only be 24 when he plays on the left side.
Nope, i don't see it. He's much more effective on his left side than his right side. He's near bottom pairing on his right side.
I’m easy either way. He’s very likely going to make it hard to send him down.
Yeah and while we're at it let's play slafkovsky at center, he'll why not put caufield at center or even defense? Who cares where players play st their best and where they are meant to play since at the end of the day, as you said, they will still exist on the team
10000% agree.
Yeah or Hutson-Parayko eventually so we have a 6"6 behemoth on the ice with him at all times
To me, its a pipe dream of course. If there was a way to trade Matheson for a bonafied #3 RHD (and add to Matheson to make it work), you do it.
Great effort at distorting what Said and at creating strawman arguments where playing a winger as a pivot is made tantamount to playing a D on his offside.
I'd be okay paying that, actually.
I don't see how we would be impeding his development, personally, and that's not what I'm pushing for in the least, as opposed to what you are suggesting.
