Lane Hutson Burgeoning Star Watch

All small players are not created equal. I think Hutson's size is precisely why he's able to do what he does.

I've heard too many times that he would have gone first overall if he were 6'2". Yeah, maybe, but it's doubtful we'll ever see a bigger guy that can play like him.
true

but he's not small, he's short

thus he is the short king
 
All small players are not created equal. I think Hutson's size is precisely why he's able to do what he does.

I've heard too many times that he would have gone first overall if he were 6'2". Yeah, maybe, but it's doubtful we'll ever see a bigger guy that can play like him.
Truly, other players are just fat. Hutson has the optimal hockey body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habano
The first 20 games of the season of no Hutson on the powerplay probably cost the team 4 to 8 points in the standings, and cost Hutson at least the same amount of power play points.

He was on pp2, which was doing well. PP2 was scoring as many goals as pp1 at that time.
PP1 did not have Laine, and they were struggling.
If Hutson was on pp1, he would've improved it, but the difference in pp points probably wouldn't have been much.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz
Hutson may be small, but to quote my Italian next door neighbour, “he have a ball the size of grapefruit”.
Take a look at the hockey fight between Sam Girard and Alex Debrincat, two small guys. Now we have another contestant.



Midget MMA Match
 
Signing long term for anything short of 12 million would be incredibly stupid from Hutson - that's still 16 million he'd be leaving on the table which is generational wealth that is too much to leave on the table.

9-10 million aav probably gets you a 4-5 year deal for him.
He’s an rfa, he’s not going to get a ufa salary, secondly no agent is going to recommend he signs a 5 year deal hoping to make bank during the next one, too many risks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz
He was on pp2, which was doing well. PP2 was scoring as many goals as pp1 at that time.
PP1 did not have Laine, and they were struggling.
If Hutson was on pp1, he would've improved it, but the difference in pp points probably wouldn't have been much.
PP2 was doing well when Hutson was on it and then when Hutson went to PP1 it started doing well, hmm...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reimannsum1988
Sometimes a defencemen comes along that shows who really understands hockey and hockey iq and exposes the people who don't understand hockey at all.

The Karlsson Hughes Hutson pipeline of exposing HF.
Stanley Cups = 0

All things aside, I'm a fan of teams getting players according to their style of play and strengths. Too early to tell what Hutson will be long term. But he looks to be more of an offensive defenseman and then Montreal have to play very attacking minded with that time he is on the ice, thus structure their group like that.

Idk if Montreal will put together that overall team build to win yet, they got interesting pieces, as many do.
 

Ad

Ad