viceroy
Registered User
You mean Carrier, not Belzile?
Speaking of brain farts... Corrected it.
You mean Carrier, not Belzile?
Didn't watch him this season , but previously , I would say premium tools with average tool box. A better version of Mike Matheson (low IQ/toolbox) with potential to be elite.Hard to have the IQ of those two, they are both elite with the puck. Luke doesn’t need to though, he is already playing at #1 defensmen level the last month. If the IQ comes then we are talking perennial Norris candidate.
Luke thinks the game extraordinarily well. His defensive IQ is miles ahead of his brother at the same age.Didn't watch him this season , but previously , I would say premium tools with average tool box. A better version of Mike Matheson (low IQ/toolbox) with potential to be elite.
Yes Hutson and Quinn IQs are elite. So it's not a knock, but just saying they are not good comparables.
Only one game but can I start yet or too soon?Will visit to sprinkle salt sparingly
He already dominates the play at the NHL. Hutson mentally recovers well from mistakes. He understands that it’s normal and part of the game. You can’t skateboard and be scared of falling. He doesn’t need any sheltering.I think it’d be a more logical move to have him dominate the AHL and focusing on improving his defensive game and removing the warts. Some of the plays he made last night would get most prospects sent down.
Well it could be either Zeppo or Gummo Hughes.If a guy says Hughes is 6’2 it is pretty damn easy to guess which brother he is talking about
I can only love or laugh, wish i could do both
We could all tellDidn't watch him this season , but previously , I would say premium tools with average tool box. A better version of Mike Matheson (low IQ/toolbox) with potential to be elite.
Yes Hutson and Quinn IQs are elite. So it's not a knock, but just saying they are not good comparables.
Different league, different teams, different defensive partners…. GA per 60 doesn’t tell you who’s better defensively when you’re looking at different seasons and clubs altogether.He was better than Hutson defensively, which is the relevant point. Whether expected goals tell the full story or not doesn’t matter — he was not bleeding nearly as many chances as Lane is.
Smaller defensemen were rare to begin with. It’s only now that they’re becoming a little more common.That might be debatable, but Hughes subsequent rise to the top of of the league for defensive reliability is an extremely rare circumstance for a player his size. Like, it's almost never happened.
People get to caught up in ‘he’s better than this or that guy’ type stuff way too much.Kid is insane, genuinely feel bad for people who can’t enjoy his play
He already dominates the play at the NHL. Hutson mentally recovers well from mistakes. He understands that it’s normal and part of the game. You can’t skateboard and be scared of falling. He doesn’t need any sheltering.