Toggle sidebar

Lane Hutson Burgeoning Star Watch

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Frank Drebin said:
Still avoiding the question i see

Maybe stop posting advanced stats without context to promote an agenda if you’re not ready to get called out on them

“Bleeding chances “ is highly dependent on what kind of team you play for, usage, teammates etc.

Posting xga/60 without context is dishonest, but you already knew that
Click to expand...
You’ve said literally absolutely nothing at all. He’s bad defensively. Ass. Clear from the eye test and statistics. Sorry that offends you, but most rookies are bad defensively. Especially midgets that are on the worst defensive team in the league playing lots of minutes.

Luke Hughes was pretty bad defensively as a rookie and is now outstanding. You can crown Lane if that happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clam Jensen
SteveCangialosi123 said:
You’ve said literally absolutely nothing at all. He’s bad defensively. Ass. Clear from the eye test and statistics. Sorry that offends you, but most rookies are bad defensively. Especially midgets that are on the worst defensive team in the league playing lots of minutes.

Luke Hughes was pretty bad defensively as a rookie and is now outstanding. You can crown Lane if that happens.
Click to expand...
It doesn’t offend me
You tried passing off xga/60 as some sort of proof that quinn hughes was better defensively as a rookie than hutson

Remember when you posted that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habano, viceroy, Montreal Shadow and 1 other person
Frank Drebin said:
It doesn’t offend me
You tried passing off xga/60 as some sort of proof that quinn hughes was better defensively as a rookie than hutson

Remember when you posted that?
Click to expand...
Yes, I remember that point that clearly demonstrated that Quinn Hughes was better than Hutson defensively as a rookie.

Anyway, bad defensive player:

1735150224425.jpeg
 
SteveCangialosi123 said:
Yes, I remember that point that clearly demonstrated that Quinn Hughes was better than Hutson defensively as a rookie.

Anyway, bad defensive player:

View attachment 951338
Click to expand...
this is you conceding that xga/60 was a bad comparison and should not have been used

Merry Christmas
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habano, viceroy, CristianoRonaldo and 1 other person
I thought all the haters were imagining the Quinn Hughes comparisons. Only took a couple points to change the confidence of some posters
 
Frank Drebin said:
You’re just as bad as the crosby fans that use the same boneheaded intangibles argument that was used against them with toews that they now use to suggest that crosby is better than mcdavid.

Years of hearing idiots say “karlsson should be a forward “ has rotted your brain to the point that you think it’s a valid suggestion for lane hutson.

Go demonstrate hockey knowledge elsewhere
Click to expand...
Nah.

Karlsson never was anywhere near as bad defensively as Hutson is.

We shall see if Hutson improves defensively, it won't be hard.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
crosbyshow said:
Hutson is way better defensively than Hughes when he was a rookie.

Hughes was awful back then.
Click to expand...
Hughes is 6’2, long reach for height, one of top 3 skating Dmen in the NHL. Do you really think he is the right guy to compare to? Find someone Hutson’s height, weight and skating that has been this bad defensively then see what they improved to.
 
Do Make Say Think said:
Nah.

Karlsson never was anywhere near as bad defensively as Hutson is.

We shall see if Hutson improves defensively, it won't be hard.


I mean, most of them live in the "world class dump"that is Montréal

Of course they are insecure
Click to expand...
Why would you insult someones city? Just keep it to hockey. You going to insult their home and occupation too?

Anyway it was a long time ago but i remember erik karlsson having a meme worthy rookie season going -31 or something

As you suggested there is room to improve, and Hutson certainly will. Especially when they find him the right partner. Matheson/savard aint it
 
  • Like
Reactions: ginomini, viceroy and dukeofjive
Jason MacIsaac said:
Hughes is 6’2, long reach for height, one of top 3 skating Dmen in the NHL. Do you really think he is the right guy to compare to? Find someone Hutson’s height, weight and skating that has been this bad defensively then see what they improved to.
Click to expand...
More than one hughes defenseman in the nhl 😎

Unless quinn is 6’2 which i don’t think he is
 
Frank Drebin said:
More than one hughes defenseman in the nhl 😎

Unless quinn is 6’2 which i don’t think he is
Click to expand...
Yea, figured that out a few posts later haha

As someone mentioned above, pairing Hutson with a defensive stud that excels denying zone entries, wins battles down low and can make breakout passes will maximize his value on Montreal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CristianoRonaldo and Frank Drebin
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom