Lane Hutson Burgeoning Star Watch

[Leonardo87]

Fellas ,stop it with the personal crap. Thanks.

 

[Miller Time]

And Hutson is often quite wreckless with the puck.

Not really.

I made that accusation after you made the claim. Show me one of the unreasonable posts you were referring to when you made the statement.

See above

 

[WhiskeyYerTheDevils]

Not really.

Agree to disagree. He's a phenomenal talent and he'll learn to make less risks over time, but he's not there yet.

See above

You just like making false posts without backing them up, huh?

 

[Miller Time]

Agree to disagree. He's a phenomenal talent and he'll learn to make less risks over time, but he's not there yet.

Yup.

And, he's already ahead of Hamilton, Casey & Hughes in that department... fyi

You just like making false posts without backing them up, huh?

Nope. Back up is right there to see... including in this most recent post.

Very unreasonable to claim player A is "too careless with the puck", while said player is far better at puck possession (give away to take away ratio) than other players one claims are "better defenders", especially when said opinion is backed up presumably because of a (mis)perceived lower risk approach to puck management

Hot takes are finally and all, but that kind of inconsistency reflects poor reasoning. Get it?

 

[WhiskeyYerTheDevils]

Yup.

And, he's already ahead of Hamilton, Casey & Hughes in that department... fyi

Hamilton, yes. Not Casey or Hughes

Nope. Back up is right there to see... including in this most recent post.

Very unreasonable to claim player A is "too careless with the puck", while said player is far better at puck possession (give away to take away ratio) than other players one claims are "better defenders", especially when said opinion is backed up presumably because of a (mis)perceived lower risk approach to puck management

Hot takes are finally and all, but that kind of inconsistency reflects poor reasoning. Get it?

Claiming that a giveaway to takeaway ratio represents anything is laughable.

Not like it matters, that post was still after you claimed most of my posts in this thread were unreasonable, a claim you have continually refused to support.

So I'll give you one last chance to support your statement. Otherwise we're done here.

 

[Miller Time]

Hamilton, yes. Not Casey or Hughes

Statistically speaking this is incorrect.

Claiming that a giveaway to takeaway ratio represents anything is laughable.

That's an unreasonable and poorly informed perspective.

Not like it matters, that post was still after you claimed most of my posts in this thread were unreasonable, a claim you have continually refused to support.

Nope. Just read and everything should be clear.

So I'll give you one last chance to support your statement. Otherwise we're done here.

Bye