Lane Hutson Burgeoning Star Watch

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,315
17,191
Agree to disagree. He's a phenomenal talent and he'll learn to make less risks over time, but he's not there yet.
Yup.

And, he's already ahead of Hamilton, Casey & Hughes in that department... fyi

You just like making false posts without backing them up, huh?

Nope. Back up is right there to see... including in this most recent post.

Very unreasonable to claim player A is "too careless with the puck", while said player is far better at puck possession (give away to take away ratio) than other players one claims are "better defenders", especially when said opinion is backed up presumably because of a (mis)perceived lower risk approach to puck management

Hot takes are finally and all, but that kind of inconsistency reflects poor reasoning. Get it?
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,358
34,000
Yup.

And, he's already ahead of Hamilton, Casey & Hughes in that department... fyi
Hamilton, yes. Not Casey or Hughes
Nope. Back up is right there to see... including in this most recent post.

Very unreasonable to claim player A is "too careless with the puck", while said player is far better at puck possession (give away to take away ratio) than other players one claims are "better defenders", especially when said opinion is backed up presumably because of a (mis)perceived lower risk approach to puck management

Hot takes are finally and all, but that kind of inconsistency reflects poor reasoning. Get it?
Claiming that a giveaway to takeaway ratio represents anything is laughable.

Not like it matters, that post was still after you claimed most of my posts in this thread were unreasonable, a claim you have continually refused to support.

So I'll give you one last chance to support your statement. Otherwise we're done here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pierre Larouche

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,315
17,191
Hamilton, yes. Not Casey or Hughes
Statistically speaking this is incorrect.

Claiming that a giveaway to takeaway ratio represents anything is laughable.
That's an unreasonable and poorly informed perspective.

Not like it matters, that post was still after you claimed most of my posts in this thread were unreasonable, a claim you have continually refused to support.
Nope. Just read and everything should be clear.

So I'll give you one last chance to support your statement. Otherwise we're done here.
Bye
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,509
3,038
Hamilton, yes. Not Casey or Hughes

Claiming that a giveaway to takeaway ratio represents anything is laughable.

Not like it matters, that post was still after you claimed most of my posts in this thread were unreasonable, a claim you have continually refused to support.

So I'll give you one last chance to support your statement. Otherwise we're done here.
Giveaway and Takeaway stats, which were horrific and not indicative of much before, are even worse this year in how they're tracked lmao.
 

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,895
14,188
Toronto, Ontario
Claiming that a giveaway to takeaway ratio represents anything is laughable.

I'll bite.

Please explain why the giveaway to takeaway ratio doesn't represent anything.

Giveaway and Takeaway stats, which were horrific and not indicative of much before, are even worse this year in how they're tracked lmao.

Please explain why they were "horrific and not indicative of much."

(And for the love of God, just answer the question I asked you and leave the goalposts alone.)
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,509
3,038
I'll bite.

Please explain why the giveaway to takeaway ratio doesn't represent anything.



Please explain why they were "horrific and not indicative of much."

(And for the love of God, just answer the question I asked you and leave the goalposts alone.)
Because there is no real defined, consistent criteria for them.

The tracking for them is horrific and inconsistent, since they're done by the home scorekeeper without any real monitoring or accountability.

That and the fact that there is virtually 0 statistical correlation between them and success, if anything it's an inverse correlation with the best players consistently ranking at the top of the giveaways leaderboard
 
Last edited:

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,895
14,188
Toronto, Ontario
Because there is no real defined, consistent criteria for them.

The tracking for them is horrific and inconsistent, since they're done by the home scorekeeper without any real monitoring or accountability.

That and the fact that there is virtually 0 statistical correlation between them and success, if anything it's an inverse correlation with the best players consistently ranking at the top of the giveaways leaderboard

Well of course the best players are high in giveaways, the best players move the puck the the most often.

How can you suggest that there's no correlation between takeaways and success? That's absurd.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
3,509
3,038
Well of course the best players are high in giveaways, the best players move the puck the the most often.

How can you suggest that there's no correlation between takeaways and success? That's absurd.
Takeaways and giveaways are tracked so poorly and inconsistently that they are not relevant beyond MAYBE comparing players on the same team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dirtydanglez

Xirik

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
9,962
14,773
Alberta
Yada yada, Advanced stats are good at understanding how good a player is.

Something something Advance stats shouldn't exist because you can only rely on your peepers.

Nobody is changing their minds. Lets go back to Hutson talk.
 

Joe n

Registered User
Aug 12, 2019
480
326
You'd think so, but according to 2 or 3 Devils fans, he's the worst defensemen in the league, and now I don't know what to believe
You seem to be really but hurt. All I've seen is that he will be a really good player but that he has flaws. I guess people on here aren't allowed to criticise him on the occasions that he makes a bad play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xirik

Bouboumaster

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
10,789
9,275
I guess people on here aren't allowed to criticise him on the occasions that he makes a bad play.

They are allowed to criticise Whoever they want, and in return I am allowed to call out their opinion when I find it stupid.

I am also allowed to call out on your ass when you seems to assume that free speech is a one way street.
 
Last edited:

Joe n

Registered User
Aug 12, 2019
480
326
They are allowed to criticise Whoever they want, and in return I am allowed to call out their opinion when I find stupid.

I am also allowed to call out on your ass when you seems to assume that free speech is a one way street.
who has said that he isn't or won't be a good player. You just seem to get upset every time someone comments that he could still improve his game. sorry that people don't think he's the best Dman since Bobby Orr..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xirik

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,358
34,000
You'd think so, but according to 2 or 3 Devils fans, he's the worst defensemen in the league, and now I don't know what to believe
Yeah I've been so critical of Hutson. Especially when I said this earlier in the thread:

He's a brilliant OFD. Anyone who doubted his abilities to make plays at the NHL level is looking pretty silly. I don't suspect he'll ever be above average defensively, but with his talent and IQ it might not matter, especially if he's played with more of a shutdown guy.

He is going to score a lot of points in this league. Really fun player to watch.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $85.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad