Isaac Nootin
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2017
- 7,794
- 12,262
LA says no.Campbell for Petersen, who says no?
Lateral move at best, 2 years older and 2 years longer for Campbell.
LA says no.Campbell for Petersen, who says no?
$4 million bonus this summer
LOLOL wow that is bad.
I think Edmonton benefits most from the deal because it would clear space to improve their defense. Especially if Petersen is in the AHL. Plus, they get out of the term sooner than Campbell. Even though Campbell was previously a good backup for the Kings, there's no guarantee he will get back to that form and also 5x5 is a lot to pay for a backup. More risk for the Kings side, which is why I had the Oilers add.Well done Blake!
Lmao this guy thinks EDM is the team that adds.
Dude is the most overpaid NOBODY in the league. Seriously. And I don’t mean most overpaid nobody goalie, I mean at any position. He’s not even a has-been. He’s a never-was.
I was just thinking on my walk at lunch that they might actually buy him out after this year, as they really need goaltending in the worst kind of way and he’s been unplayable since he got that contract. I actually didn’t expect him to be waived today though.
The first 3 goals he allowed last night were not great and they were definitely the difference in the game.
I don’t understand what grounds he deserved that kind of money on, but it looks like Blake isn’t f***ing around.
every team over values their playersLA overvalues their players
They make the same AAV and Campbell is a better goalie. Makes no sense for us.I think Edmonton benefits most from the deal because it would clear space to improve their defense. Especially if Petersen is in the AHL. Plus, they get out of the term sooner than Campbell. Even though Campbell was previously a good backup for the Kings, there's no guarantee he will get back to that form and also 5x5 is a lot to pay for a backup. More risk for the Kings side, which is why I had the Oilers add.
This IS a trade of two goalies with 1980s save percentages
They only save 1.125M off his cap if he's waived, it might not be a barn burner of a trade.Incoming trade?
I dont think LA has a very deep farm system when i comes to goalies
whats the cap hit for a buy out?They only save 1.125M off his cap if he's waived, it might not be a barn burner of a trade.
They only save 1.125M off his cap if he's waived, it might not be a barn burner of a trade.
Really don’t see Carolina trading any goalie.Canes have 3 legit goalies.
Perhaps Raanta for Copley + 2nd.
It's more of an attempt to shake him up. Since he signed the new contract, he has immediately and progressively gotten deeper into some kind of mental issue with confidence -- continuing the path would only further the exponential trajectory he's on. He really should go on a 10 meditation retreat or something (or a 3-5g mushroom trip with a guide/therapist).So what goalie is better than him who has earned the backup job, or are they just attempting to shed his contract here and not actually send him down?