Rosen is the only person involved in Kings media that actually will discuss this stuff, everyone else is to afraid to even bring the massive struggles of Byfield into their various programs. The closest you get is the Mayor saying that QB has to stay at C because he's the last hope of a 1C (which is true). And ofcourse Rosen gets criticized on messageboards for daring to actually talk about the reality of the situation, especially when it comes to Byfield and Turcotte. I guess some people would just rather read Pravda.
cbj fan coming in peace. given our timeline and need at center (even assuming we take one at 3OA) i think byfield would be a perfect piece for us.
would byfield for our 2024 first make sense for the kings? we're not expected to be a playoff team. could be a nice pick.
The Kings have a very small window to compete, if QB were to be moved it would be for an asset able to contribute significantly with Kopitar and Doughty for 1-3 seasons.
The shadow of those Cup teams will always be cast long over the team until they move on and allow new players to forge their own identity instead of constantly being measured up to fit into something that was extremely good but extremely short lived a decade ago.
Long story short, the team is screwing up its present AND future in favor of living in the past.
This is what Chicago did, they traded Kane and told Toews they weren't bringing him back because it's impossible to turn the page while still clinging to memories of years past. It's going to be really difficult to win a Stanley Cup with Doughty and Kopitar as the best players on the team, it's 2023 not 2014.
If Kopitar retires, and Byfield busts, I think you just go into full on rebuild mode. You'd have plenty of highly value able assets to trade to kick start the rebuild.
That is one smart thing Blake has done, when the window closes in a couple of years they will be able to restock draft capital very well on guys like Fiala and Kempe.
In that recent interview Yannetti basically said its a 5-7 year development plan to fully make the team as an impact player. I think they are going by data but Im not sure.
This is so bogus, making the the team and being an impact player are not always the same thing. But not surprising the group that believes only McDavid types can jump straight to the NHL.
How can a guy like Mark Yanetti who actually works for an NHL team be this ignorant to what is going with young players in the league?
Do these guys even watch the NHL, or are they exclusively watching young players?
And guys like this are who people like Axl think need to have some extraordinary qualification to do their jobs, like they are brain surgeons or rocket scientists.
Byfield is a perfect piece for Kings as well.
Would you like to trade Kent Johnson to our 1st round pick in 2024?
How is Byfield a perfect piece for the Kings right now?
The Kings are a team trying to win a Stanley Cup in a 1-3 year window before their 2 best players fall off a cliff and he has for the most part been a non-factor in three years since being drafted #2 overall.
And his trade proposal wasn't awful value wise and wasn't similar to your counter proposal.. Where Columbus picks next year could result in a much better prospect than QB or one similarly ranked. The only way you think that's not the case is if you think Columbus is a SC caliber team next season.
LA trading QB to Columbus would likely net them a 1-10 pick for a player who has struggled pretty mightily in 2 NHL seasons. Columbus trading Johnson to LA would likely net them a 20- 30 pick for a player who had 15-25-40 as a 20 year old NHL rookie.