Ah, I thought I sorted by goals and apparently I didn't.
The previous full season unaffected by COVID (2018-19) only had 45 30+ goal scorers. This year had 51. That's less than 2 30+ goal-scorers per team. Kings had 0 30-goal scorers the two years they won the cup.
You were waiting for something like that, because you know absolutes like this are fundamentally flawed, but it's the only way you can defend this stance of letting otherwise quality players walk.
Edit: PS, Colorado's top-3 goal scorers combined a total of 98 goals. Edmonton's top 2 goal-scorers potted 99. And Hyman had 27. By your logic, they should have easily been able to beat Colorado.
The definition of quality players seems to be where our differences are.
Moore being a quality player is a point of view.
Him being a 3rd liner, scoring 17 goals would make him high quality
Moore scoring 17 goals as top 6 winger makes him low quality
I don't even know what else to say at this point.
The Kings have been at the bottom of the league for years and years now and people want to change that by doing exactly what we did through those years.
I really don't want to turn into one of the mediocre teams, that barely make the playoff here and there and L.A. has already an image where players go to end their careers.
This is mostly the reason why i reach for the stars, if you demand top player salary, you better deliver top player performances.
Kopitar 19 goals and 69 points for $10mill is a disaster
Iafallo $4 mill for 17 goals is atrocious
Arvidson 4,2 mill for 20 goals and playing like a brain dead zombie is disgusting
For real, why are you guys so terrified of letting people like that go?
If we can't replace a 17 goal scorer from within out system, we have bigger problems then extending Moore or Arvidson.
Khaliev scored 14, playing very limited minutes and for a fraction of our "quality" players.
His future is bright and the team has to be build around his age group, not creating a veteran reunion tour at the cost of our youngsters