I’m not hard on Bjornfot. There’s just not a lot to love about his game. There’s a few things he does well. And I don’t see that changing over time.
I look at Spence who’s maybe not as good as Bjornfot defensively but his game is a lot more valuable because he can do so much.
I think using this age excuse like everyone did with Forbort is extremely misguided. There’s many times you see what you have in a player and see what they can polish up.
There’s not much polishing to do with Bjornfot because he’s pretty one dimensional.
Look at Durzi, he has a lot of solid tools and if he gets his defensive poise better which I do think he will, he can turn from whipping boy into a really solid d man who does make good passes on the powerPlay, plays with an edge, decent skating, and good offensive iq. Shore up his defense a bit and he can be an extremely effective Swiss Army knife.
Bjornfot plays with zero edge, his offensive ability is limited to taking it to the offensive zone and losing it immediately, and his strengths are good skating and good defensive awareness. That’s not someone I will lose sleep over trading. The same people who were willing to give Forbort eons when he showed some extreme limitations to his abilities are here again making the same case for Bjornfot.
And if I’m wrong tell me what his strengths are and why we should keep him over Spence and Durzi in the line up.