I often wonder why this board despises certain types of players so much. Obviously those being skilled offensive players that would be considered "soft". Even guys the Kings have had issues with like Tkachuk are respected and admired. And I think you kind of brought up the reason by mentioning Kopitar, and its because it's just been so long since we had a player who made you jump out of your seat when he had the puck. Kopitar kind of fit the bill with the skilled part, but Kopi was a unicorn, he was a big skilled, two-way center, he brought it all.
The last time we had a player that was like a Zegras, Gaudreau, Caufield type was Palffy who last played for the Kings in 2004. It's hard to remember having a player like that. We've had a great center in Kopi, a great D in Doughty and a great goaltender in Quick. The two things we have never really had the last decade was an elite offensive defenseman and an elite high skilled scoring forward.
No way Zegras and Stutzle have been in the AHL. Byfield has been up the whole time he has been healthy, Kupari is going to get 60 games and Vilardi got 30. Even Turcotte got 8.
As far as the picks being the right ones, based on what, the rankings? If that is the case there is no such thing as a bad pick ever, Aki Berg and Derek Forbort were picked about where they were ranked, so was Jeff Tambellini. I mean that is fine to think that, but by that criteria there is no such thing as a good or bad draft as long as teams pick guys where they are ranked.
You live in that part of the country, did you ever watch Turcotte play in college, did he really strike you as a worthy top 5 pick?