It's not so much that AA will be stud or a unicorn, it's just that his expected offensive production is going to exceed the offensive production the Kings are currently getting from their wingers he would be competing against. Does he possess the puck as well as some of those guys? No, is he as good defensively? No. But the Kings don't need more puck possession or defensive wingers, we have plenty of those, they need guys who are capable of finishing as we don't have many of those. I also question some of the hyperbole of his defensive shortcomings, if he were so bad defensively that he is costing the team goals-against at levels that more than cancel out his offense then how are the Kings so good with him in the lineup? Are we really going to deny that a guy who scored 9 times in his 22 games for a team that really struggles to score might just be the offensive production needed to push the team over the edge many nights when he is in the lineup?
The object of the game is to score more goals than your opponent, that is why the Kings are on the ropes for a playoff spot, if games were measured by possession metrics and shot generation the Kings would be Stanley Cup contenders, but those metrics matter more when you have atleast average finishers in the lineup, the Kings don't, they have poor finishers so those stats don't matter nearly as much. In a league that is at minimum a 3-2 league and many nights is a 4-3 league the Kings score less than 3 goals in more than half their games, that is why despite amazing defensive performances by both the coaches and the players we are on the fringes. I am not denying the possession and shot generation stats do matter, they certainly do, but for a team like the Kings who don't even have anything close to average finishers they matter less. As we learned with Nick Shore, you can be a possession stud and be a pretty good defensive player but if you can't generate any offense it doesn't matter. You can possess the puck 60% of the time but if the opponent is outscoring you when they have it 40% of the time you are going to end up playing in Europe or the minors, because you aren't helping your team. We aren't winning games with, "they possessed it well" and "the offense is just around the corner" or "they are so due". Tangible production is more important for a team like the Kings than intangible observation.
AA has 9 goals and 14 points in 22 games, over a full 82 that is a 35 goal and 52 point pace.
Here is the production for every other winger on the team in their last 22 games
Kempe - 7G, 6A, 13 Pts
Moore - 6G, 9A, 15 Pts
Arviddson - 10G, 7A, 17 Pts
Iafallo - 1G, 5A, 6 Pts
Kaliyev - 4G, 4A, 8 Pts
Vilardi - 3G, 0A, 3 Pts (20 games)
Kupari - 1G, 4A, 5 Pts
Lemieux - 1G, 2A, 3 Pts
It's just not enough guys, not enough to sit a guy who has been able to produce something tangible this year, not with the talent on the teams we are chasing, we aren't going to beat Edmonton and Calgary 2-1 every night, we need to find ways to create more goals. If you want to keep all the young players in despite the lack of production, that is fine, but then you have to sit Iafallo. You just can't keep trotting out that many offensive black holes every night and expect to score the 3 goals needed to atleast have a chance to win most nights.