In short, yes, the defensive shortcomings ARE that bad.
When he's playing with Danault and Moore, they're doing great. He's about a 10% corsi and GF drag on everyone else, though. And for a team that's constantly hovering about 50% GF/GA at even strength, these numbers are really, REALLY problematic. It's not hyperbole, and that's why I keep resisting it so much.
View attachment 528886
It's funny because when those were Byfields numbers you were on a tear shredding him...why is AA so special?
Eh, hard to say.Frolov wasn't full Frolov until 23-24 though, and those clips are from when he was 26+....I''m confident Vilardi will get there too, you can see the Perry/Frolov in his game around the net! He's due a couple of goals at this point imo.
Have we fallen so far that we're pining for Frolov?
Don't hate, APPRECIATE!Have we fallen so far that we're pining for Frolov?
Smearing them?Those twitter followers put themselves out there on a public forum commentimg on their twitter accounts.I know you dislike like DB and the Mayor but this is just rich.The clown show can be seen from many platforms and make believe GM and coaches on social media.Spend enough time on here and you can see plenty of bad takes and questionable insights.BTW many podcast/shows read off twitter handles when reading questions and statements on their shows.Ah yeah, class act for social media representatives of the organization--block people who disagree with you then smear them on your podcast.
That's what you choose to cheer for. Nice.
These guys become more of a clown show by the day.
In short, yes, the defensive shortcomings ARE that bad.
When he's playing with Danault and Moore, they're doing great. He's about a 10% corsi and GF drag on everyone else, though. And for a team that's constantly hovering about 50% GF/GA at even strength, these numbers are really, REALLY problematic. It's not hyperbole, and that's why I keep resisting it so much.
View attachment 528886
It's funny because when those were Byfields numbers you were on a tear shredding him...why is AA so special?
I was a big Frolov defender back in the day.Don't hate, APPRECIATE!
Frolov was awesome!
![]()
Did I ever post Frolov's letter to me when he was playing in Korea for the Killer Whales?I was a big Frolov defender back in the day.
They are fans who got found a way to monetize covering the Kings, good for them, the Kings were the worst covered big 4 team of any market I lived in, so props to them for filling that need.If I'm running a large, visible organization like the LA Kings/AEG, I would be more than a little annoyed that some fans that I gave a platform are using that platform to insult and attack my paying customers simply because some anonymous people on the Internet were mean to them. I'd stop sponsoring their ego trip that's borne out of nothing but opportunity; it's certainly not borne out of qualifications and absolutely not professionalism or tact, at least not anymore.
Most other professionals can handle it. But then again, I guess the word 'professional' is flattering.
I think you did? I remember something like that a while ago.Did I ever post Frolov's letter to me when he was playing in Korea for the Killer Whales?
He'll be my future husband in no time.
I don't know who the guy in the middle is but look at these two hunks. My lord~I think you did? I remember something like that a while ago.
It’s all about production. The Kings need more goals in the lineup, how do you resist putting your 3rd best goal-scoring forward on a per game basis into the lineup to keep in multiple offensive black holes. You see this stuff, you comment agreeing with the lack of finish in GDT’s then you want to keep the status quo and lose every game 3-2.
So you say he produced a 40+ goal pace with Danault and Moore , ok great can we get that line back together? We have people calling for Vilardi and Anderssen to be out back together based on meaningless preseason games but NHL games mean nothing? How about putting those 3 together and seeing if they can get get back to that pace? Arvidsson can either move up with Kopitar and Kempe and form what is actually a passable first line or if TM insists on this Iafallo disaster to continue he can put VA on the third line and hope that he can spark Byfield and whoever the other winger will be. As of now we are getting nothing but fancy advanced stats and “offense is so close to happening” stuff for the past dozen games about the third line and way below what is needed from a first line because Todd has our one difference maker wing playing with a center who is going on 35 and another winger playing like he’s going on 45, all of this as we lose a bunch of games 3-2.
I just don’t know how fans can not want to insert someone who has been able to score at a first line pace through a quarter of a season and how the coaching staff is so unwilling to make any kind of line restructuring through any of this.
The only glimmer of hope is that Todd did move Iafallo to the third line the last time the forward group was fully healthy. Unfortunately Arvidsson and AA got injured and Iafallo was able to recover his large role. Maybe if we get fully healthy again Todd will consider that move again. I’ve given up on a scratch ever happening, Todd is more loyal to vets than even Sutrer was.
They are fans who got found a way to monetize covering the Kings, good for them, the Kings were the worst covered big 4 team of any market I lived in, so props to them for filling that need.
But these guys have both made some pretty awful takes over the years, as bad or worse than the ones they highlighted in their podcast, its amazing that neither guy realizes that before they try and embarrass people.
And agreed, shame on the Kings for promoting crap like this.
Frolov has been the best winger drafted and developed by the Kings since Robitaille.Have we fallen so far that we're pining for Frolov?
I was blocked because I responded to a tweet with a quote of him saying the exact opposite in the past. It started a bunch of people posting the Mayer’s flip flopping.Smearing them?Those twitter followers put themselves out there on a public forum commentimg on their twitter accounts.I know you dislike like DB and the Mayor but this is just rich.The clown show can be seen from many platforms and make believe GM and coaches on social media.Spend enough time on here and you can see plenty of bad takes and questionable insights.BTW many podcast/shows read off twitter handles when reading questions and statements on their shows.
I don't know who the guy in the middle is but look at these two hunks. My lord~
![]()
“Paul Ladue is playing in the top 4. Paul Ladue is a top 4 defenseman.”They are fans who got found a way to monetize covering the Kings, good for them, the Kings were the worst covered big 4 team of any market I lived in, so props to them for filling that need.
But these guys have both made some pretty awful takes over the years, as bad or worse than the ones they highlighted in their podcast, its amazing that neither guy realizes that before they try and embarrass people.
And agreed, shame on the Kings for promoting crap like this.
With even a shred of luck, AA is gone this summer to finally find his spot in the show.What doesn't work is AA-Byfield.
Oil-vinegar.
At least, it was Oil-Vinegar when Brown was the third member of the line.
Kopitar/Danault are good enough to make up for AA's two-way shortcomings.
Byfield's trying to keep his head above water. You can't ask him to do that with AA (not good defensively) and Brown (too f***ing slow and useless everywhere but in front of the net).
I just took issue with the idea that AA should be in the AHL.
Anyone arguing this has zero concept of what makes a team successful.Frolov has been the best winger drafted and developed by the Kings since Robitaille.
Alexander Frolov was f***ing money.
Frolov was Dustin Brown without the endurance.Anyone arguing this has zero concept of what makes a team successful.
Alexander Frolov was f***ing money.
Speak for yourself! I’m pining for the Fjords!Have we fallen so far that we're pining for Frolov?
Hoven and Bernstein are incredibly thin skinned and completely childish if anybody disagrees with their takes.If I'm running a large, visible organization like the LA Kings/AEG, I would be more than a little annoyed that some fans that I gave a platform are using that platform to insult and attack my paying customers simply because some anonymous people on the Internet were mean to them. I'd stop sponsoring their ego trip that's borne out of nothing but opportunity; it's certainly not borne out of qualifications and absolutely not professionalism or tact, at least not anymore.
Most other professionals can handle it. But then again, I guess the word 'professional' is flattering.