unicornpig
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2017
- 3,764
- 5,500
at this point if they not gonna play him trade him. So grossThey're not trading Spence.
at this point if they not gonna play him trade him. So grossThey're not trading Spence.
Lmao, no dude… his partner would come via trade. Hopefully a stout defensive Dman with size, physicality and toughnessThey're not trading Spence.
Lucic was traded in the last year of a contract. Risto had 1 year left. Not the same. Not close.
OEL, sure, but Ari also got nothing but bad players and contracts back. but they didn't care, because they were rebuilding. But the Kings aren't in the same position. Just like the Kings have never been in a similar situation with Kopitar and Doughty as the Hawks with Kane and Toews this year.
Blake should not trade Kempe, Durzi, Moore or Arvidson, unless he is getting a serious upgrade at their position.I agree, and was hoping to see the following no such luck from toddy todd
Doughty off the PP1 and reduced overall minutes
Durzi limited to the PP1 and the 3rd pairing with a limit on 5v5 time.. but this would just increase the minutes on the top 4 which should be more evenly spread out. He needs to be traded
Roy is the biggest disappointment as he’s been regressing for the second year in a row. Either they pair him with Bjornfot and get a shutdown pairing or they move him and clear space for both Spence and Clarke
Anderson - Doughty
TRADE - Spence
Bjornfot - Clarke
If they want that difference making LHD, then the following are all on the table
Kempe
Durzi
Roy
Kupari
Grans
Grundstrom
With Moore supposedly close to signing.. maybe Ardvisson
Kempe + Roy gets you a really nice LHD, add in Durzi and who knows
He played a lot at Wing one year, in 16/17. He had 29+32 in 49 games. Yes he scored more the following year on a ppg basis but in junior you expect that sort of evolution in scoring anyway. So I remembered incorrectly that it was his most productive spell, as I’m remembering what I read when we drafted him.Why do you try to paint him as a winger? He's not and it's clear. Maybe he played a couple shifts as one but the guy's a natural center.
That’s the only reason i trade any of those guys.. I’m not saying make a trade for the sake of making one..Blake should not trade Kempe, Durzi, Moore or Arvidson, unless he is getting a serious upgrade at their position.
They need a big LHD, who is tough and can fight ideally. Not liking most of the choirs song list for Christmas 22.
That’s the only reason i trade any of those guys.. I’m not saying make a trade for the sake of making one..Blake should not trade Kempe, Durzi, Moore or Arvidson, unless he is getting a serious upgrade at their position.
They need a big LHD, who is tough and can fight ideally. Not liking most of the choirs song list for Christmas 22.
They will have to give up good players to fill those holes but they need to balance the lineup. The pieces I would put on the table now are Durzi, Walker (waiving at a minimum), Roy, Arvidsson and Kempe.Blake should not trade Kempe, Durzi, Moore or Arvidson, unless he is getting a serious upgrade at their position.
They need a big LHD, who is tough and can fight ideally. Not liking most of the choirs song list for Christmas 22.
He scoffed at a reporter when asked about the change to wing and said he likes to carry the puck through the middle. fwiw.He played a lot at Wing one year, in 16/17. He had 29+32 in 49 games. Yes he scored more the following year on a ppg basis but in junior you expect that sort of evolution in scoring anyway. So I remembered incorrectly that it was his most productive spell, as I’m remembering what I read when we drafted him.
I’m not saying he’s not a natural C (at least early on) but it’s a complete falsehood that him playing W is only a thing in LA.
Imagine being Fagemo and Bjornfot.
Called up, succeed, then sat while the team loses their mud. Then sat again.
This is gross mismanagement. Continual gross mismanagement.
I completely agree that he prefers C.He scoffed at a reporter when asked about the change to wing and said he likes to carry the puck through the middle. fwiw.
I don’t get Bjornföt sitting as he played well and more importantly the lineup was balanced. Fagemo, MAYBE, benefits from getting a couple of games in the press box but he’s also done ok. Weird is the only thing I can call it.It’s some of the worst roster mismanagement I’ve ever seen, and I’ve been watching hockey for close to 40 years.
In any other market Blake and TMac would be getting crucified over stuff like Durzi-Roy and Clarke not playing any hockey anywhere.
I get the explanation and facts, but I am loathe to break up the DAM line they are TMacs only untouchable line. We need that stability. Kempe is streaky and currently in a lull. But his upside is immense that is why they are again trying him at C, and I like that. He is the main puck carrier on the PP, and mostly solid definsively. Durzi needs to be used properly by the coach. He is breaking out as PP QB. 3rd pair sheltered not on LD. Iafallo is the swiss army knife, very good on D side of puck and the boys love him and playing with him. He allows versatility and options for the coaches facing injuries and streaky play. Super underrated.They will have to give up good players to fill those holes but they need to balance the lineup. The pieces I would put on the table now are Durzi, Walker (waiving at a minimum), Roy, Arvidsson and Kempe.
Durzi and Roy are turnover machines and Roy if anything is a bigger issue as he’s supposed to be a defensive player. Arvidsson and Kempe, simply because you have to give to get and we have wingers in the system to allow Kaliyev to stay in the top 6. Kempe just needs a kick in the rear end and will go back to wing when QB comes up. I will add Iafallo to the trade bait list if/when Turcotte is properly ready. All 3 forward I‘ve listed I’m happy to keep, the D have no place if we are hoping to become a contender IMO.
I’m not saying trade all these pieces but I’d move 2-3 of them to fill the two major holes we have.
Oh I see, misread lol, my bad. Agreed then.Lmao, no dude… his partner would come via trade. Hopefully a stout defensive Dman with size, physicality and toughness
So who do you move that gets you a piece we need? If the young guys are overrated they aren’t going to do it. As I say, certainly with the forwards I listed it is about sacrificing something but it will give a better all around team ultimately. Moving fringe players is tinkering at the edges. Either the younger guys take over event or we have big problems.I get the explanation and facts, but I am loathe to break up the DAM line they are TMacs only untouchable line. We need that stability. Kempe is streaky and currently in a lull. But his upside is immense that is why they are again trying him at C, and I like that. He is the main puck carrier on the PP, and mostly solid definsively. Durzi needs to be used properly by the coach. He is breaking out as PP QB. 3rd pair sheltered not on LD. Iafallo is the swiss army knife, very good on D side of puck and the boys love him and playing with him. He allows versatility and options for the coaches facing injuries and streaky play. Super underrated.
People on here are overrating the young guys they are touting, they don't have the size , strength and experience to do the little things right. We have seen the little things cost us games, or lead to the game being blown open like in Toronto. I prefer the Lombardi method of taking a cheaper player on a reclamation project without giving up some of these important pieces. Like he did with Willie, Gaborik, and Scuderi. Those pick ended up helping win cups.
I will leave it up to Blake and judge him at the end of the year. I listed why I wouldn't trade those guys but if an equal or better is coming back then ok, trade. I like Bjornfot and Moverare too but evidently Tmac don't. Copley is a reclamation. The young players just dont know how to do all the little things right. I think Walker has to be let go if not included in a deal and Spence comes up. I would like a bigger 4c and let Lizzo and JAD go.So who do you move that gets you a piece we need? If the young guys are overrated they aren’t going to do it. As I say, certainly with the forwards I listed it is about sacrificing something but it will give a better all around team ultimately. Moving fringe players is tinkering at the edges. Either the younger guys take over event or we have big problems.
Reclamation projects are rare and these guys were spread out, not all signed at the same time. Scuderi wasn’t a reclamation project anyway, he had just come off a cup win in Pittsburgh and was considered a good pickup.
I don’t get Bjornföt sitting as he played well and more importantly the lineup was balanced. Fagemo, MAYBE, benefits from getting a couple of games in the press box but he’s also done ok. Weird is the only thing I can call it.
Next year will be really interesting regardless because Kupari, Fagemo, Thomas, Madden, Dudas, and Villalta will all require waivers. Those first three are the only ones we likely worry much about, but if Kupari is waived he’ll almost certainly be claimed.So for next year,
I would trade Petersen, and Kopitar and Doughty if they give it a waive. I know unlikely.
Resign Moore, Vilardi, Fagemo, Lemieux, Anderson , Bjornfot and Copley.
Resign for Reign: Madden, Dudas, Akil, Kupari, Ward, Bisson, Allard,
Goodbye: JAD, Edler, Ingham, Wagner, Phaneuf, L. Andersson, Hrenak.
And acquire new faces to fill any gaps.
You left out KaliyevNext year will be really interesting regardless because Kupari, Fagemo, Thomas, Madden, Dudas, and Villalta will all require waivers. Those first three are the only ones we likely worry much about, but if Kupari is waived he’ll almost certainly be claimed.
Who do we move to create a roster spot for Kupari though? Moore and Lemieux are the only UFA forwards and I have to think they’ll be re-signed. Edler is the only UFA defenseman, and although he likely goes, that doesn’t open up much.
Here’s a lineup using only forwards who would need to clear waivers for next year, assuming we re-sign Lemieux and Moore:
Iafallo - Kopitar - Kempe
Fiala - Byfield - Vilardi
Moore - Danault - Arvidsson
Lemieux - Lizotte - Grundstrom
Fagemo - Kupari - Thomas
Madden - JAD - Dudas
That’s not even keeping in mind guys like Turcotte, Helenius, Pinelli, and Chromiak, who aren’t that far away.
Something has to give here soon.
Next year will be really interesting regardless because Kupari, Fagemo, Thomas, Madden, Dudas, and Villalta will all require waivers. Those first three are the only ones we likely worry much about, but if Kupari is waived he’ll almost certainly be claimed.
Who do we move to create a roster spot for Kupari though? Moore and Lemieux are the only UFA forwards and I have to think they’ll be re-signed. Edler is the only UFA defenseman, and although he likely goes, that doesn’t open up much.
Here’s a lineup using only forwards who would need to clear waivers for next year, assuming we re-sign Lemieux and Moore:
Iafallo - Kopitar - Kempe
Fiala - Byfield - Vilardi
Moore - Danault - Arvidsson
Lemieux - Lizotte - Grundstrom
Fagemo - Kupari - Thomas
Madden - JAD - Dudas
That’s not even keeping in mind guys like Turcotte, Helenius, Pinelli, and Chromiak, who aren’t that far away.
Something has to give here soon.
The forward lineup crunch is part of the reason why i think it's odd to hear that Blake is working on a Moore extension. Unless you have plans to trade Kempe/VA at the TDL or offseason. I like Moore, but really what's the LT roster construction plan here? I honestly don't think he has one.
Why would they lose Kupari for less than market value?The hilarious irony of Blake’s deranged slow rolling of every prospect in the organization is that we’ll wind up losing decent players like Kupari for below market value.