AbsentMojo
F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Last year identity was 1) tenacious forecheck to beat teams 5 on 5, 2) light-checking, 3) shit special teams, 4) below average defense, 5) below average goaltending.. this year its basically the same, but change 4) to league bottom defense, 6) league bottom goaltending, change 3) to 1 shit special team, and 1 upper 3rd special team... improved in 1 area digressed in 2.... but improving the talent in the d-corps they could quickly improve 4) and 3). What should the identity be given the roster and pipeline? dont see any way to have success in the playoffs without adding some size and more diverse D players like Zadarov types. In the end you can lean toward skill, speed and have some above average D/goaltending, with maybe league average physicality and that could be your identity. Edit: what im assuming is this is a zero sum game - if you go for speed, you give up in size (generally speaking), you go for skill you give up some physicality.. so this is the identity based on how you allocate between the categoriesI doubt it given it's a conditioning assignment. He's not 'there' like Spence, Fagemo are especially (but others too including turcotte madden)
It is a bummer but if the PK can simply not be AWFUL and the PP stays top 10 that bodes well.
Last year we were the only playoff team with BOTh special teams in the toilet
Every playoff team had at least one top tier special team, either PP or PK, even if the other was 'just' mediocre. And it often went along with the team's identity (like 2018 Kings' elite PK).
But then--that has been the problem with the team's identity too...
Last edited: