SherVaughn30
Registered User
Petersen stole that money and for anyone else they could have acquired.He signed for 2.5 mil in Detroit, where was that going to come from ? We barely were able to sign Anderson and Durzi.
Petersen stole that money and for anyone else they could have acquired.He signed for 2.5 mil in Detroit, where was that going to come from ? We barely were able to sign Anderson and Durzi.
Wait, I thought they were going to showcase him so he could be the centerpiece in a deal to acquire Shesterkin?? Stupid Blake…Sad trombone for those who got their panties in a bunch.
Champagne popping sound for those happy he wont be playing tuesday.
I don't think you can accrue cap space with LTIR relief, I believe it just allows you to go over the cap by that amount, not save that amount. I could be wrong though.
Kaliyev moved from the 4th to the 3rd line. Where is the next prospect playing? The 1st line isn't sitting. The 2nd line isn't sitting. The new 3rd line isn't sitting. The 4th line isn't sitting. And they still have JAD sitting there. Kaliyev is the one getting a greater opportunity.
Which is why I said Iafallo or Moore would be great for Byfield's line. And also why I advocate against a "kids line".and really hasn't done anything. He's the weak link on that line since being put there. Sadly, they miss Iafollo digging the puck out for them.
Which is why I said Iafallo or Moore would be great for Byfield's line. And also why I advocate against a "kids line".
But I'm sure in the near future, we'll have Kupari called up, thrown on Byfield's line, and people will say "Well, they're calling up prospects and 'given an opportunity', KP. What more do you want, aside from just bitching?"
When in all actuality not only are the prospects still not getting the opportunity, they're likely going to struggle because they aren't ready to carry a line by themselves.
Todd McLellan had some fascinating comments about the lines after practice today. I assume tons of people are talking about it already.The top 2 lines aren't changing, right or wrong, so the 3rd or 4th line is the opportunity they get.
Just read the Insider article, found absolutely nothing fascinating about TM’s comments…what am I missing?Todd McLellan had some fascinating comments about the lines after practice today. I assume tons of people are talking about it already.
he’s talking about this quote:Just read the Insider article, found absolutely nothing fascinating about TM’s comments…what am I missing?
Ok, so what’s fascinating?I think
he’s talking about this quote:
“I’m comfortable with two right now, I was comfortable with three,” McLellan said. “I thought that Quinton Byfield’s line at the beginning of the year was one of our better lines, there was no concern. They could still be that, Al’s a different player, right now we’ve got Arthur there, it’s a little bit different. I think Lizzo’s line has an identity, they know who they are and they play that way. Phil’s line, in my opinion, is starting to click a little bit more, finally getting Arvy back. The other two lines are in flux, trying to figure things out, but they have the capability of being really effective.”
If I remember correctly it took some time for Gaborik and Kopitar to get in sync. I think Gaborik made adjustments to his game to suit Kopitar's style, which is not suited to speedy players who like to rush the puck.It means that Fiala ain't working with Kopitar.
This should not be news to anyone.
The context, tone and manner in which the quote was given.Ok, so what’s fascinating?
I was also kind of replying to this because McLellan's quote was an answer to my question about how many lines he's comfortable with BECAUSE last year he specifically said one of the reasons he wasnt going to break up one line was because the other THREE lines were playing to his satisfaction and he didn't want to break up three lines to save one.The top 2 lines aren't changing, right or wrong, so the 3rd or 4th line is the opportunity they get.
If I remember correctly it took some time for Gaborik and Kopitar to get in sync. I think Gaborik made adjustments to his game to suit Kopitar's style, which is not suited to speedy players who like to rush the puck.
Gaborik learned he had to use his skill set in close to the net to maximize his value to the Kings.
This is the one thing I never understood and it infuriates me to this day..If I remember correctly it took some time for Gaborik and Kopitar to get in sync. I think Gaborik made adjustments to his game to suit Kopitar's style, which is not suited to speedy players who like to rush the puck.
Gaborik learned he had to use his skill set in close to the net to maximize his value to the Kings.
This is the one thing I never understood and it infuriates me to this day..
Kopi doesn’t need super high end skilled players or speedsters, what he thrives with are guys that can play/park/plant themselves in front of the net.
Not sure why management tries all these guys with him when the reality is we need a Brownie type guy but we don’t have that..
Hell, I think(not that I know shit).. I would drop Fiala with PD and Arvy and move Moore up with Kopi and Kempe. Moore maybe not be a front net presence but he sure as hell knows how to get there and he brings what Iafallo does just with more speed
Agree with your comment btw 17
The Kings were forced to include Olli Jokinen when they got Ziggy Palffy so, yes. They have a say in that sort of thing.Does the NHL have any approval of trades, beyond checking to see if any contract/salary cap terms are violated? Would they let some some ridiculous trade occur....like Matthews to the Kings, 50% retained for future considerations?
The league made LA pay more for PalffyDoes the NHL have any approval of trades, beyond checking to see if any contract/salary cap terms are violated? Would they let some some ridiculous trade occur....like Matthews to the Kings, 50% retained for future considerations?
you winThe Kings were forced to include Olli Jokinen when they got Ziggy Palffy so, yes. They have a say in that sort of thing.
or… Maybe Pinto is just better than Kaliyev? He’s a much better ES player for sure. Over 30% of Arty’s points are on the PP. Pinto has 2 career power play points. Arty averages 2:22 of pp time per game. Pinto, 1:53. Arty’s time has decreased this year because he’s not playing well enough to overtake those ahead of him. He’s given PP time because its his strength, which is what you want for a young player.noticed Shane Pinto breaking out in Ottawa....
Was taken right before Kaliyev in the draft.
Noticed.... 14:30 TOI vs Kaliyevs 10:34.
120 Shifts vs Kaliyevs 93. Ott fans say hes getting decent time on PP2 where as Kaliyev gets final dying seconds PP time.
Frustrating and gives credence to those questioning the development path, is TMAC putting young players in position to succeed?