Choralone
Registered User
Overreactions? Sir, this is HF Boards.
I still cannot fathom how Blake ever thought Walker was impactful enough to necessitate a 4 year deal north of 2.5M.
It’s truly baffling.
I think people are being unfair to pre-surgery Walker's abilities, too.
He wasn't a world-beater but that money and term is (well, was) just fine for a guy who was versatile enough to play any position in the lineup on a mediocre team for 20+ minutes a game and not get bashed in.
Fantasy football is ahead of hockey in its injury analysis, and the typical advice there is to not draft players unless they're 12-16 months past ACL surgery. Also, agreed on the revisionist history. Walker was the "out of nowhere" bright spot on some bad Kings teams, and he got love from the analytics and eye test community over his first couple seasons.Absolutely, lots of revisionist history going on. For comparison, Sean Walker was every bit as good (or better) than Matt Grzelcyk in Boston when he signed that deal. Same term, same signing year, but Boston paid over a million more AAV. Not only was Walker a good deal, but he was also a good deal for a team that absolutely needed NHL defensemen. Like 7824 said Spence and Clarke weren't in the equation back then.
The surgery really hit him hard, those are a lot to come back from.
Would look alot better without Durzi IMO. Move Roy where Durzi is and Walker becomes 7th D.There’s absolutely no hockey reason both Spence and Bjornfot shouldn’t be in the lineup. It’s f***ing absurd that Blake has literally 10+ NHL ready defensemen and he still managed to screw up our blueline.
Anderson-Doughty
Bjornfot-Durzi
Edler-Spence
Roy
This is not difficult. Waive Walker.
Even with this tweak, which is logical but you know they wont do - the corps is not well composed. Id actually rather have Edler and Spence as the 2nd pair to hide Durzi more. Edler at least has size and can body guys (you do give up quickness).. But Bjornfot Durzi is too small and not physical for a 2nd pair. Spence is also much better moving the puck out of the zone than Durzi (esp on his wrong side). But basically this is rearranging the deck chairs.. The d-corps is so poorly constructed.. they are at least 2 transactions away from addressing it properly (Walker, Roy, Edler, Durzi need to go (Durzi due to Clarke's emergence)).. and need a very strong 2nd pair stay at home LD.There’s absolutely no hockey reason both Spence and Bjornfot shouldn’t be in the lineup. It’s f***ing absurd that Blake has literally 10+ NHL ready defensemen and he still managed to screw up our blueline.
Anderson-Doughty
Bjornfot-Durzi
Edler-Spence
Roy
This is not difficult. Waive Walker.
Even with this tweak, which is logical but you know they wont do - the corps is not well composed. Id actually rather have Edler and Spence as the 2nd pair to hide Durzi more. Edler at least has size and can body guys (you do give up quickness).. But Bjornfot Durzi is too small and not physical for a 2nd pair. Spence is also much better moving the puck out of the zone than Durzi (esp on his wrong side). But basically this is rearranging the deck chairs.. The d-corps is so poorly constructed.. they are at least 2 transactions away from addressing it properly (Walker, Roy, Edler, Durzi need to go (Durzi due to Clarke's emergence)).. and need a very strong 2nd pair stay at home LD.
I don't see your right side as I would like Durzi moved way before 24/25. Maybe Grans could be ready by then if you have moved on from Drew. Just curious what type of player do you see Drew getting?Oh, sure. That lineup is trying to make the best of what we have right now.
Durzi is a player you probably sit on until someone is willing to overpay for him. As others have pointed out, teams are willing to pay a lot for 50-60pts regardless of position. I understand people want to turn over the reins to players like Spence and Clarke. I do, too. And players like Roy and Walker are journeymen at best who absolutely should be moved/waived as soon as possible. But Durzi has real world value. If deployed correctly, he’s a perfect 4-5 on a contender.
Assuming Spence and Clarke both reach their ceiling, yeah, Durzi probably doesn’t have a long term future in LA. But we would be in a unique position league wide in that regard, with three stellar RH PMD in Durzi’s way.
Also, hot take inc, but the real 4D chess move is to move Doughty by 24/25, and roll Clarke, Spence, and Durzi down the right side. But I may be alone there lol.
Yes Durzi could fetch quite a bit.. I was thinking he gets moved in the offseason not this year so Clarke slots in next year. You are not alone re DD - had that thought as well. DD chews up too many minutes and is not pushing play at all. The 1st pairing is not providing offense - esp when compared to the best like Colorado...it is far far from that. I also noticed last year when DD went down the team defense actually got better.. not sure how that is explained other than bjornfot spence and durzi stepped up and played really well... I think it was @kilowatt who postulated the Ewing effect might be an explanation as well. The other thing is a new leadership group wont form until the legends step back or are gone... so there's that as well.Also, hot take inc, but the real 4D chess move is to move Doughty by 24/25, and roll Clarke, Spence, and Durzi down the right side. But I may be alone there lol.
Hey let's lay off Mr. Rob Blake a bit. Maybe he just does not know much about NHL level defensemen and that whole area of a team. Let's give him some time to learn about the blue line. He's likely an expert in other areas (like maybe goalies, coaches, etc.) and will eventually get up to speed and fully understand the defensive side of a team.It's fkn ridiculous the way Hall of Fame D Rob Blake has constructed this off-balance joke of a D corps.
Completely absurd amount of RH offensive D types. Near total absence of LH D with size and grit.
There is no excuse for the fact that this organization has drafted only 3 LHD in the top 2 rounds since 2014, Bjornfot, Clague and Lintuniemi who never signed. That's it. Complete and total abdication by Blake. I am sick of looking at this D. And now I am sick of looking at Blake. Ridiculous joke.
if sarcasm was maple syrup id have more than enough for the pancakes i just madeHey let's lay off Mr. Rob Blake a bit. Maybe he just does not know much about NHL level defensemen and that whole area of a team. Let's give him some time to learn about the blue line. He's likely an expert in other areas (like maybe goalies, coaches, etc.) and will eventually get up to speed and fully understand the defensive side of a team.
There were only 5 rhd drafted by the Kings in the first two rounds during the same span. Two were traded by Lombardi when the Kings desperately needed a rhd and one was traded by Blake.It's fkn ridiculous the way Hall of Fame D Rob Blake has constructed this off-balance joke of a D corps.
Completely absurd amount of RH offensive D types. Near total absence of LH D with size and grit.
There is no excuse for the fact that this organization has drafted only 3 LHD in the top 2 rounds since 2014, Bjornfot, Clague and Lintuniemi who never signed. That's it. Complete and total abdication by Blake. I am sick of looking at this D. And now I am sick of looking at Blake. Ridiculous joke.
There were only 5 rhd drafted by the Kings in the first two rounds during the same span. Two were traded by Lombardi when the Kings desperately needed a rhd and one was traded by Blake.
Drafting size and grit way too early in the first and second rounds is how the Kings busted with many picks while players picked after the Kings draft slot turned into all stars during the Lombardi era.
I don't see your right side as I would like Durzi moved way before 24/25. Maybe Grans could be ready by then if you have moved on from Drew. Just curious what type of player do you see Drew getting?