then i flip my desk wondering what could have been for the past 10 yearsPlot twist. Danault puts up 2 goals and 98 assists while Kopitar does more of the heavily lifting on the defensive end.
sounds like something a bot would ask.....................Why do you say that?
sounds like something a bot would ask.....................
I am ok trading Turcotte for the right player like a Top talented LD.Byfield I've never seen anyone on here want to trade him tho.There's some people here that have to complain about every transaction that the Kings make as well.I like the signings today and think it will help the team and benefit the kids learning in the long run.No, I don't really think he's given up much of anything this offseason, while still adding Danault and Arvidsson. That's why I'm basically okay with these acquisitions, even though I don't like Danault's contract.
We were fortunate Handzus basically worked out (he was good 2 of his 4 years IMO). No guarantee Danault will work out as well. These types of deals usually don't work out.
There were people around here who were okay with trading Turcotte, or Byfield, or 1st round picks to try and make us a contender right now. I was criticizing that mentality.
Of course limiting Kopi PK duties keeps him fresher during the game.This allows Kopi to be better rested and prolong his career.Who said Danault and Kopi won't play on the say PP? They may even be split up on different PP.Kopi does alot without Stoll or Lewis on this team,add Carter as well.So the plan to increase offense was to sign a defensive forward to a 6 year deal in hopes it allows a 34 year old center to produce more?
I don't think that is the plan at all.
From the interviews I saw, he will get a bigger role and PP time with the Kings. I expect 40-50 pts from Danault while also reducing Kopi's ice time from PK duties. There is 0 guarantee that this will result in more production from Kopitar though.
Been a Kings fan since 1971 so I have seen plenty of dumb moves. This one has to rank in the top 5 worst moves. The Kings need goal scorers not 5.5 million for someone that scores 6 goals in 75 games. Blake has to go.
I bet you were a big proponent of the Kovalchuk signing. Thought he would kill it on the PP.Been a Kings fan since 1971 so I have seen plenty of dumb moves. This one has to rank in the top 5 worst moves. The Kings need goal scorers not 5.5 million for someone that scores 6 goals in 75 games. Blake has to go.
Danault serves no purpose for the Kings. This is exactly a Kings move from the the 1970s or 80s all in for the first round of the playoffs. Danault just blocks a roster spot fromI'm surprised a long time fan could come to such a conclusion.
I guess trading all those draft picks, Larry Murphy, Alexei Zhitnik, Darryl Sydor, Cernak, the pick that turned into Barzal, acquiring Jeremy Roenick, Dan Cloutier, etc., rank behind the Danault signing? Really rationale post here. You might be better served sulking with the other petulant posters over on LAKingsInsider.
Didn't care either way because I thought the Kings were rebuilding.I bet you were a big proponent of the Kovalchuk signing. Thought he would kill it on the PP.
Danault serves no purpose for the Kings. This is exactly a Kings move from the the 1970s or 80s all in for the first round of the playoffs. Danault just blocks a roster spot from
one the many Kings prospects. I thought the whole idea of a
rebuild was to try to build contender but if all you want is to watch 4 or 5 playoff games a year enjoy.
The Kings rarely had prospects to rush in the 70s or early 80s.Did the Kings give up any prospects or picks today? Being a long time fan, I'm sure you remember how many careers the Kings ruined because they rushed prospects and forced them into spots they clearly weren't ready for.
Danault would be 7th on the team in goals scored over the past three seasons despite receiving only slightly more power play time than Michael Amadio (167:19 to 156:00, respectively).
For context, over the same span of three seasons, Kopitar spent 614:13 on the power play, Brown 500:34, Iafallo 465:50. Hell, Kovalchuk had more power play time in 81 games with the Kings than Danault did in 205 games with Montreal.
Conversely, over those same three years, Danault played 502:06 on the penalty kill, more than any Kings player including both Doughty (459:46) and Kopitar (400:29).
Danault has played tougher minutes than almost anyone else in the league. This is a guy you want on your team. Danault will help Kopitar as much as Kopitar will help Danault.
The Kings rarely had prospects to rush in the 70s or early 80s.
Danault would be a great addition for team that could use a little defense to go along with all there scoring but this not were the Kings are at. The Kings cant even trade prospects for goal scorers because now they have no cap space. The most valuable asset the Kings had has salary cap and now they don't. If the cap stays flat for 5 years people are not going to look back at this move as a good one.
My lineup, shake it up!
Iafallo - Kopitar - Arvidsson
Athanasiou - Danault - Tkachyov
Kempe - Vilardi - Brown
Lemieux - Moore - Kupari
The most valuable asset the Kings had has salary cap and now they don't. If the cap stays flat for 5 years people are not going to look back at this move as a good one.