I disagree with Sol on plenty of things, including that signing. However given he’s acknowledged he was not correct since, you’re just trolling… again.
Of course he's not correct! That's just a fact, that doesn't make him some noble prince for acknowledging facts. Problem is, it's a constant trait...and it's lame, and I'm going to enjoy rubbing his nose in it. Thx for playing.
Remember when you were gloating about Sturm's PP in the AHL doing so well earlier this season? And how bad the Kings PP was? Why aren't you talking about that anymore?
But it was all true at the time, our PP was doing nothing. Danault was never a 'legit terrible signing' unless you were born with rocks in your head.
And yet when the coaching stuff makes bad decisions (yes, it is possible) you cry and whine that people dare criticize them. By whining about the negativity here you've become the most negative person here, it's pathetic. Once you realize this board doesn't all hold the same opinions and that some people like Danualt, some people don't, some people like Fiala trade, some people don't then your experience here will stop being so negative and maybe people will take you off the ignore list.
How will people here know my experience is less negative if I'm on their ignore list?
Are you going to bump this every time? Lol. My initial reaction vs after a day after it settled is very different. I admire your obsession. From making fun of people for being on here daily to dedicating your life to go through my posts. Living rent free lol.
Most of the reactions people have here are based on some combination of emotional and logical processing. Especially immediate reactions.
Do you remember when you started fantasizing about me? I actually don’t remember when I got you in your feelings. Even though you annoy everyone, I’ve actually found your mental collapse pretty funny. So, thank you for the entertainment.
I’ll even elaborate why I didn’t like the signing initially. I didn’t think his numbers were worth such commitment but also I was worried that they were going to bury the rookies like Byfield. Danault is a good player for sure but there’s legit reasons to not like the signing. We’ve all talked about rookies getting the shaft and he was another shaft in their story. I don’t know why my admirer loves to dig through my old posts but I don’t think me not liking the signing initially was illogical.
When we are talking about guy that liked the deal, Piston was one that was touting Danault prior to free agency. I was a bit skeptical due to the supposed lack of scoring but the fact that all of his points were at even strength got me over that issue.
And when I kind of get something right I may as well pay myself on the back a bit. Still think this was a bit of a Turcotte hedge as well as not knowing if Vilardi would cut it as a C.
I do, actually. It was when you posted that selfie with your new Kings jersey and teasing us by only exposing half of that well groomed face. I thought to my self, ‘what a hot hunk to go along with all those hot takes!’
