Cyber
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2014
- 754
- 2
What? He's not even a RFA this summer.
I'm sure Stan thinks more than half a year ahead. He's got his chess pieces set up for the next 3-5 years.
What? He's not even a RFA this summer.
I'm sure Stan thinks more than half a year ahead. He's got his chess pieces set up for the next 3-5 years.
Other teams aren't sending feelers for a RFA 1.5 years out.
You really don't think so? I'm 95% sure Panarin's agent has already been contacted by people connected with other franchises.
Other teams aren't sending feelers for a RFA 1.5 years out.
More money than I thought he would get, but I don't have a problem with it.
Krugs is worth it. Move Shaw out if necessary, he's a much easier piece to replace.
And lol at people bringing up offensive numbers. He's a shut down center that starts almost every shift in the defensive zone.
Panarin is gone
Not a chance. Stan has already come public when it comes to Panarin. Usually when he does that, the guy is part of the core. He's fine.
I guess Kruger is lucky that Bowman is the GM and not me. (for that matter the Hawks are probably lucky, too). That contract is about double what I would have paid. The guy provides zero offense. In addition, a rookie like Danault was able to take his place and the Hawks didn't miss a beat.
I guess Kruger is lucky that Bowman is the GM and not me. (for that matter the Hawks are probably lucky, too). That contract is about double what I would have paid. The guy provides zero offense. In addition, a rookie like Danault was able to take his place and the Hawks didn't miss a beat.
That's completely false.
Says you. Must be true then.
You don't understand the value Kruger has if you just look at his goal and assists numbers.
I guess that one stat means its really realy really true.. .