Confirmed with Link: Kreider extended 7 years, AAV approximately $6.5MM

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Thoughts on the Kreider extension?

  • Love it!

  • Like it

  • Indifferent

  • Don't like it

  • Hate it


Results are only viewable after voting.
Are we thinking the Rangers drew the line originally at 6x6.75. Then at the last minute this was the compromise to get a seventh year included?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2
I wonder if they signed him with trade deals on the table they weren't happy with?
 
I wonder if they signed him with trade deals on the table they weren't happy with?
they said their first priority was to sign him so if they couldn’t compromise that probably had a deal in place they were at least somewhat happy with. Personally I don’t think anybody was offering what they wanted which was a first and a really good prospect along with another piece
 
The fact that the Rangers saw fit to re-sign Kreider, unlike every other player from the prior run that reached this situation should signal what the organization feels about his importance both on and off the ice:

While I agree the organization feels differently than Kreider than others in years past (and for good reason), I think a lot of it also has to do with timing. For example...if the McD and Kreider's contract situations were switched, I'm not so sure the Rangers would still re-sign Kreider and trade McD.
 
Image-from-iOS-6-2.jpg
 
Do we know details on his contract yet? Is it front loaded? Did he get a NTC in any form? If his contract is front loaded with no NTC, I think the last two years can be traded more easily. Lower AAV also means salary retention in a trade is more managable. Lots of bottom dwelling teams love getting players with low $ owed but high AAV to get themselves to cap floor. All we can do now if cheer and hope that CK ages like Ovechkin instead of Lindross. I think we can all agree that Ovechkin has somehow kept his magic even at his age so there is hope for CK even if he isn't a generational player.

EDIT: hmm... I'm guessing the info graph above has the numbers? Are those confirmed?
7.9, 7.6, 7.3, 8.8, 6.3, 5.6, 4.8?
 
Makes this contract look wayyyyyy better than half the board wants you to believe.
I mean the this year and the next few aren't the problem with this deal. Its there being a pretty good chance he will not be nearly as good as he currently is in the backhalf of the deal.
 
Do we know details on his contract yet? Is it front loaded? Did he get a NTC in any form? If his contract is front loaded with no NTC, I think the last two years can be traded more easily. Lower AAV also means salary retention in a trade is more managable. Lots of bottom dwelling teams love getting players with low $ owed but high AAV to get themselves to cap floor. All we can do now if cheer and hope that CK ages like Ovechkin instead of Lindross. I think we can all agree that Ovechkin has somehow kept his magic even at his age so there is hope for CK even if he isn't a generational player.

EDIT: hmm... I'm guessing the info graph above has the numbers? Are those confirmed?
7.9, 7.6, 7.3, 8.8, 6.3, 5.6, 4.8?

Shane Doan is another good example of a power forward lasting a long time. So did Tkachuk, Claude Lemieux and Brind'Amour.
 
Shane Doan is another good example of a power forward lasting a long time. So did Tkachuk, Claude Lemieux and Brind'Amour.
Bill Guerin is an interesting one. His numbers actually improved once he got to be Kreider’s age and older. And he’s a classic power forward.

If you compare Guerin from 23-28 to Kreider from 23-28...it looks pretty similar. And what’s really interesting is this stretch of years:

Age 28: 80GP 30-34-64
Age 29: 70GP 24-22-46
Age 30: 85GP 40-45-85

Do I think Kreider is going to magically become a 40 goal guy like Guerin? Probably not. But it’s just one example of a guy in a similar mold who did exceptionally well in that age bracket.

Edit: Imagine though if we had traded Kreider and he became Bill Guerin 2.0? They may as well have just nuked this part of the board if that transpired.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jas
Bill Guerin is an interesting one. His numbers actually improved once he got to be Kreider’s age and older. And he’s a classic power forward.

If you compare Guerin from 23-28 to Kreider from 23-28...it looks pretty similar. And what’s really interesting is this stretch of years:

Age 28: 80GP 30-34-64
Age 29: 70GP 24-22-46
Age 30: 85GP 40-45-85

Do I think Kreider is going to magically become a 40 goal guy like Guerin? Probably not. But it’s just one example of a guy in a similar mold who did exceptionally well in that age bracket.

Edit: Imagine though if we had traded Kreider and he became Bill Guerin 2.0? They may as well have just nuked this part of the board if that transpired.

I think Crosby or Malkin had something to do with it.
 
Not happy with this at all, and I definitely don't see Kreider as captain, I would rather give it to Fox despite him being a rookie.
 
This is the biggest yikes i've seen this season, what the hell..

General Managers buy out bad contracts, so they can hand out new bad contracts :laugh:

To be fair, at 6.5m it's not as bad as I initially thought it would be. With talks about an AAV between 7 and 8m, the 6.5m isn't that bad. I still feel the last 3 years will hurt us unless Kreider keeps up. And I really hope he does. I hope he's the exception to the rule. I really do.
 
Serious question, there was some kid that was overweight that had a podcast. think his name was mike > is he still around, anyone knows his podcast . blue shirt something
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad