Most nights is agree with you on kc. But what stood out so bad tonight? He wasn't good on the PP, but effort wise what play(s)?
You mean like a Chris Tanev type player?Don’t remember the Jets giving up as many odd man rushes as they did in this game. Poor D pinches with no F support. They need to tighten that up before playoffs.
My priority would be getting a RHD that can play up or down the lineup, hopefully pushing Pionk down the lineup. A better DeMelo, if that player is available.
future winnipeg jet great helping out his future team with 2 goals 2 assistsSharks 6 goals on 18 shots so far lead 6-3 early in the third
Billeck went through the Jets games and they are apparently 19-4-3 when ehlers starts on the 1st line (not sure how he's doing with games like Carolina or Buffalo though)
I agree with you though the top line wasnt bad tonight. It'd be ridiculous as you say.
Such a streaky player but is lit up atm, shouldn't cost too muchfuture winnipeg jet great helping out his future team with 2 goals 2 assists
Yeah could just be me looking for it because it's been talked about a lot lately. On the powerplay where you want him to be a main guy it seemed like he was throwing the puck away a lot.Idk if all giveaways are necessarily chalked up to effort. But i guess was more asking on the egregious defensive plays which are pretty typical for him.
Did you really think we could count on San Jose for anything?. On another note, I really want avoid Dallas in the first round. They are scary good. Stankoven, Wyatt Johnston and Harley are 3 of the best young players in the league. Throw in Robertson, Hintz, Benn, Pavelski, Heiskinen, Tanev , Ottinger and whatever other big name they add at the deadlime and they are one scary team. Perfect mix of vets and youth with a ton of talent to spare. Plus they have our number this year.of course they tied it
I agree about that particular example.Prime example. On the short handed goal, lost the battle on the boards due to poor effort which led to the breakaway. Losing board battles all game. Effort is there when puck is on his stick.
Weak call? He broke his stick in half.Horrible goal to give away the game.
And I feel for Stanley. What a weak call. Stupid sticks. Cant believe those fragile pieces of **** cost so much.
Weak call? He broke his stick in half.
I...can't stop looking at it...Coelacanth of the game:
#17 Adam Lowry
Scored a beauty and added points. Very strong game.
I don't normally post the COTG award after a loss, but who is writing the rules here anyway?
View attachment 830327
The thing is, there are lots of players like him in the league. Soft and not strong defensively, but can fill the net.KC is such a limited player but he just needs that one chance to break a game open.
In all honesty I think it's more about him then who else they have on the line with him and Mark.
He needs a nz driver which is why Names has been fine in that role imo. But his limitations really limit what you can do with that top line if he's one it.
We've seen Mark have a lot of success the last few years with combos that didn't include KC. Mark doesn't need a driver but Mark with KC does.