redwings8831
Registered User
- Jan 16, 2009
- 1,232
- 1,350
it’s to get kostinWhy would we take on Yama to buy him out? What incentive is that and please don't tell me it is getting Kostin.
okay I won't tell you thatWhy would we take on Yama to buy him out? What incentive is that and please don't tell me it is getting Kostin.
you think wings will be worse than last year?
Ana
Chi
Sjs
Philly
Cgy
Wpg
zona
will all be way worse imo then there’s a cluster of the middle pack where who know what happens
Hall had 36 pointsHall and foligno is gone. Frederic’s gone. Bergeron and Krejic could both retire. Pasta had a career year. Might trade Ullmark. Bertuzzi may go elsewhere.. Things could get ugly fast in Beantown
no no no you misunderstood.I know I shouldn't be surprised but it's day 2 of the draft and people are already writing off next season?
it’s to get kostin
okay I won't tell you that
There’s one more year on yamamotos deal. I find it highly unlikely we buy him out. If we truly don’t want him I could see him getting banished to the AHL more than anything.Sigh!
Kostin is not good enough to be buying out players to get him. Not even a guarantee he isn't going home.
I think chicago might do too well next year. They might even be out of the bottom 5 now, which I don't think is that great of an idea. Unless there real plan was to get all the vet leadership for bedard to learn until february, then trade them all (foligno, perry, hall) to contenders for 1st/2nd picks. Not a terrible idea obviously, but who knows.you think wings will be worse than last year?
Ana
Chi
Sjs
Philly
Cgy
Wpg
zona
will all be way worse imo then there’s a cluster of the middle pack where who know what happens
Buying Yamamoto out would be beyond dumb. His remaining 1 year at 3 million isn't any sort of strain to us for a guy who although inconsistent year to year, has been a career 0.5 ppg player playing up and down a lineup.
I'm not some bizarre Yamamoto truther who thinks getting him is some coup, but like, holy f***, there's zero downside to giving him a run in our lineup this year.
I am confused why we don't retain 50% and add him to the trade deal for debrincat, if they would like that or not is another conversation.Buying Yamamoto out would be beyond dumb. His remaining 1 year at 3 million isn't any sort of strain to us for a guy who although inconsistent year to year, has been a career 0.5 ppg player playing up and down a lineup.
I'm not some bizarre Yamamoto truther who thinks getting him is some coup, but like, holy f***, there's zero downside to giving him a run in our lineup this year.
And you somehow expected that all to change on draft day?I don't see Detroit being better than Ottawa, Buffalo or the rest of the atlantic. And the only team in the metro doing worse is Philly.
you think wings will be worse than last year?
Ana
Chi
Sjs
Philly
Cgy
Wpg
zona
will all be way worse imo then there’s a cluster of the middle pack where who know what happens
And you somehow expected that all to change on draft day?
I mean, free agency hasn't started. There's a long time before now and the 1st puck drop in October.
Yeah I'd have no issue with that.I am confused why we don't retain 50% and add him to the trade deal for debrincat, if they would like that or not is another conversation.
Although I agree with mostly everything you and others have said, we have to remember an important distinction:My negativity is to me this means we aren't trying for better players, we are still doing the take flyers on guys and hope we get something. Taking flyers is fine, especially for free, but it makes it look like we are going to be worse next season. There is only so many forward spots and we already have struggling to score guys in our lineup.
Although I agree with mostly everything you and others have said, we have to remember an important distinction:
This is the second year in Lalonde's system. Every team who starts the year in a brand new system that they have never played in before, never do too well or it clicks immediately. It didn't click immediately for us, but we showed that when we played Lalonde's system and never strayed, we actually played extremely great games. The problem is the consistency.
If we iced the same team as we did last year for this coming year, I would say we would do slightly better (would be a little bit more better if it weren't for devils and others just retooling like crazy for next year). These additions for free don't do much, but I think Kostin > Sunny by a long shot and that will help tremendously. Not to mention we will most likely have Kasper, full season of Edvinsson, and maybe an ALJO and Wallinder sightings here and there.
So all in all, I think we are going to be better as a team overall, it just depends on the teams that we are playing against and how far they progressed. We shall see I suppose.
EDIT: Not to mention, Lalonde's system is actually extremely good for wins. Like I said, when we play the system like it should, we win the games and mostly by a wide margin (not goals necessarily, but winning a game that is 3-2 but feels like it should have been 5-1 is a wide margin imo. It's like when Michigan played Penn State last year and were losing at the end of the 1st have 17-16 or something, but Michigan was clearly beating the hell out of Penn State. End result proved it too).
Absolutely. I'm extremely puzzled that we don't have more offense (FA hasn't started so I guess there's that, I'll wait to have full opinion until then I suppose). But I am even more puzzled that we didn't trade for DBC or players like him (goal scoring) since Yzerman, Lalonde, Larkin (in that interview he did on the golf course like what yesterday?) all said we need goal scoring help, we have no one that can get us 30 goals a season, etc etc.Defensively I think we will be fine. My disappointment is there is no offence to speak of. Not trying to be a downer, was just hoping we were going to be more aggressive this summer. I know there is a lot of time from now until October, but if we get one or both of these 2 guys that is now another forward spot or 2 taken up and we are using it on players who don't really address a major need for this team.
Absolutely. I'm extremely puzzled that we don't have more offense (FA hasn't started so I guess there's that, I'll wait to have full opinion until then I suppose). But I am even more puzzled that we didn't trade for DBC or players like him (goal scoring) since Yzerman, Lalonde, Larkin (in that interview he did on the golf course like what yesterday?) all said we need goal scoring help, we have no one that can get us 30 goals a season, etc etc.
It is quite perplexing that they say this, it is evident that they really aren't lying because our goal scoring was pretty bad (especially real finishers in the lineup), and yet this happens?
Extremely confused and hope there is some sort of clarity coming from these guys soon, whether that is from them speaking or their actions through trades, etc.
And you somehow expected that all to change on draft day?
I mean, free agency hasn't started. There's a long time before now and the 1st puck drop in October.
Lawdy lawdy. Season's barely over and you're talking about tanking next season already?I think we’re forgetting, that more or less this lineup was in the playoff hunt until February. Even without Bert most of the yr. Then they fell apart against OTT, then they got injured and fell aparter (thank god). I think it’s totally possible that we end up at pick 15 next year with this roster. And that is the problem. We are in the twilight. I get that Stevie also has to consider the business side and not let his young players get pummeled to death. But this was the yr in which tanking would’ve been the play.
BTW: Is the next draft class considered excellent as well? I only know of Celebrini so far.
Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. That team is still absolutely putrid and as soon as someone is injured you're going to see rookie sensation Roomba With A Sherwood take the ices