McKee had a few years under his belt. Dennis is not even a year in so I feel that it may make it a bit more difficult to rid a coach that has 2 years on his contract. It's been done, mind you.He didn’t give McKee that consideration.
Just sayin.
McKee had a few years under his belt. Dennis is not even a year in so I feel that it may make it a bit more difficult to rid a coach that has 2 years on his contract. It's been done, mind you.He didn’t give McKee that consideration.
Just sayin.
Speaking of picks in the cupboard........Morrison went to Ottawa for 2 x 2nds, 2 x 3rds and 2 x 4ths. So when you take this into consideration, the "big fish" will probably go for more. From what I see, the only contenders that might be able to pull off getting Wright with picks alone are Ottawa (Yikes!), Saginaw, Flint and Barrie? A couple others are in if they include some quality warm bodies. Barrie is intriguing as they have Clarke coming back. Bringing in Wright would sure give them a boost.I don’t think there’s any way we can make any trade of significance right now. Not with the picks we have left in the cupboard.
I've heard this many times and shake my head as to how contradictory this statement sounds! If you a developing players for the NHL, how do you do this with coaches that aren't developed???I remember at one of the Rangers upper management saying the OHL is not just a development league for players but also GMs and head coaches.
Speaking of picks in the cupboard........Morrison went to Ottawa for 2 x 2nds, 2 x 3rds and 2 x 4ths. So when you take this into consideration, the "big fish" will probably go for more. From what I see, the only contenders that might be able to pull off getting Wright with picks alone are Ottawa (Yikes!), Saginaw, Flint and Barrie? A couple others are in if they include some quality warm bodies. Barrie is intriguing as they have Clarke coming back. Bringing in Wright would sure give them a boost.
Not looking good for us Rangers.
I've heard this many times and shake my head as to how contradictory this statement sounds! If you a developing players for the NHL, how do you do this with coaches that aren't developed???
Wasn't McKee just one of Eerie's Assistant Coach's when we hired him?McKee had a few years under his belt. Dennis is not even a year in so I feel that it may make it a bit more difficult to rid a coach that has 2 years on his contract. It's been done, mind you.
Didn't McKee do well when he left?The new additions are producing well and have passed the eye test skill/ability wise, but the coaching staff is still getting the same embarassing results.
Wasn't McKee just one of Eerie's Assistant Coach's when we hired him?
He sure did. Not sure what explains his poor performance and the drastic turnaround when MM took over for him. He's gone on to bigger and better things since...that's why I'm just a tiny bit curious to see what Dennis does after this gig; is he as brutal a coach as us fans think, or does this organization somehow exacerbate a coaches weaknesses (or little of column A, little of column B).Didn't McKee do well when he left?
Yes sometimes too close to the action blurs the vision. I think you need to look higher than Denis or MM. If the "inexperienced" ownership group trys to interfere/control things too much it has a direct impact on the final product. Your seeing similar issues in Niagara although a lot worst for them.He sure did. Not sure what explains his poor performance and the drastic turnaround when MM took over for him. He's gone on to bigger and better things since...that's why I'm just a tiny bit curious to see what Dennis does after this gig; is he as brutal a coach as us fans think, or does this organization somehow exacerbate a coaches weaknesses (or little of column A, little of column B).
We had multiple injuries under McKee. Just before they were scheduled to return, and the firing took place. McKenzie’s first game as coach, for example, was the goaltender Ingham’s first game back.He sure did. Not sure what explains his poor performance and the drastic turnaround when MM took over for him.
We had multiple injuries under McKee. Just before they were scheduled to return, and the firing took place. McKenzie’s first game as coach, for example, was the goaltender Ingham’s first game back.
I would’ve loved to have seen McKee coach that team at least for another few weeks to see how he would’ve fared with a healthy lineup.
That's what nepotism hires do. I'm really curious what, outside of dad's word and an interview with a hockey loving kid (of which there are tons of), got our head scout his first gig with our organization...and what track record they are looking at (beyond round 1) that got him promoted to Head Scout from within.Let’s not lose sight of just how god awful our drafting has been. Any analysis shows us right near the cellar for scouting/drafting competence. Coupled with limited, passive, in over their heads coaches and it leads to what we’re seeing.
No, you demonstrated far too much scouting aptitude in that moment to be hired by Kitchener.That's what nepotism hires do. I'm really curious what, outside of dad's word and an interview with a hockey loving kid (of which there are tons of), got our head scout his first gig with our organization...and what track record they are looking at (beyond round 1) that got him promoted to Head Scout from within.
Really kicking myself for not getting that interview with EJ Maguire asap when it was offered, and talking with scouts at the WJ training camp two decades ago who thought I knew a lot about hockey/scouting based on my (10-11 years old) assessment of Phaneuf "Having all the tools, but rocks for brains"...starting to think I might have had the kind of resume the Rangers would hire for...if only I had a parent working for the team.
Always bugged the hell out of me when MM fired McKee. MM never got a cup of coffee in pro hockey and he fires an NHL pro. It all fit in to the old boys narrative here in KTown. Sometimes this storied franchise does seem a little tacky around the edges.No, you demonstrated far too much scouting aptitude in that moment to be hired by Kitchener.
Always bugged the hell out of me when MM fired McKee. MM never got a cup of coffee in pro hockey and he fires an NHL pro. It all fit in to the old boys narrative here in KTown. Sometimes this storied franchise does seem a little tacky around the edges.
Guys he just wants you to be patient.. come on now...
Nope. Just wondering what MM may be thinking regarding Dennis.Are you saying you want CD to stick around for 2 or 3 weeks? How much heart have you seen out of this team this year? Less than a hand full of games. You can still play with heart / energy and not have a full line up. Even I like what you usually say but CD has shown nothing he should stick around another day imo.
Definitely the McKee firing was the right call. I am a bit surprised at all the warm fuzzy feelings over McKee. Did he have success after leaving the Rangers? To me, the jury is still out. We had the missed COVID year and then went into a year where McKee was given a very talented Hamilton team to work with. Sort of reminds me of the Mem Cup Joe Crozier won us even though most knowledgeable hockey fans know that it was Orval Tessier's baby.McKee firing was the right call at the time by any metric; his success with Hamilton is just further indication than something stinks in this organization.
Come to think of it, even though MM's been pretty good (his reputation perhaps bolstered by the gong shows that came before), it almost certainly helps that he is Bob's Son...can't be a coincedence both Bob's Son's have landed strong jobs in the hockey industry (MM here and Sean with Sportsnet).
Definitely the McKee firing was the right call. I am a bit surprised at all the warm fuzzy feelings over McKee. Did he have success after leaving the Rangers? To me, the jury is still out. We had the missed COVID year and then went into a year where McKee was given a very talented Hamilton team to work with. Sort of reminds me of the Mem Cup Joe Crozier won us even though most knowledgeable hockey fans know that it was Orval Tessier's baby.
Storied franchise? Too be honest I never understood that association with the Rangers accept for the attendance by the fans. Seems lately that narrative about storied is all "fairy tales".Always bugged the hell out of me when MM fired McKee. MM never got a cup of coffee in pro hockey and he fires an NHL pro. It all fit in to the old boys narrative here in KTown. Sometimes this storied franchise does seem a little tacky around the edges.
Even so Crozier had that team's attention. I ran across a couple of role players at a party one Saturday night. No drinking and they made curfew. Said they didn't want to give Crozier a reason to trade them.Definitely the McKee firing was the right call. I am a bit surprised at all the warm fuzzy feelings over McKee. Did he have success after leaving the Rangers? To me, the jury is still out. We had the missed COVID year and then went into a year where McKee was given a very talented Hamilton team to work with. Sort of reminds me of the Mem Cup Joe Crozier won us even though most knowledgeable hockey fans know that it was Orval Tessier's baby.
IMO, we were a storied franchise in the 80's though most of that credit should go to Mike Penney. 4 Memorial Cup appearances and often at the top of the standings.Storied franchise? Too be honest I never understood that association with the Rangers accept for the attendance by the fans. Seems lately that narrative about storied is all "fairy tales".
To me like this franchise is in the same position like in the late 90's when the BoD and the other "Suits" involved with the team stepped back and gave a hockey guy in PD full control. Then when the team had success and PD left the "same old same old" started to happen when they stepped in to bathe in the teams glory brought in by PD. Very little effort in hiring by constantly hiring within aka "keep them under their control and looking out for each other" which went through all levels and departments.
For all the teams initiatives for being a community owned team, the prime one should be winning. With winning comes all the means to provide some of the community goodwill.
I've maintained exactly what you said for a very long time.Storied franchise? Too be honest I never understood that association with the Rangers accept for the attendance by the fans. Seems lately that narrative about storied is all "fairy tales".
To me like this franchise is in the same position like in the late 90's when the BoD and the other "Suits" involved with the team stepped back and gave a hockey guy in PD full control. Then when the team had success and PD left the "same old same old" started to happen when they stepped in to bathe in the teams glory brought in by PD. Very little effort in hiring by constantly hiring within aka "keep them under their control and looking out for each other" which went through all levels and departments.
For all the teams initiatives for being a community owned team, the prime one should be winning. With winning comes all the means to provide some of the community goodwill.