Knowing our luck those guys will have question marks around them and we draft someone else.Welcome to Montreal Celibrini/Eiserman
My knee is done, tore a ACL and a bunch of arthritis in it… was offered to have a replacement… Maybe it was to correct everything at once, I won’t go further in my med assessmentsThat is not what knee replacement surgery is lol
But its no picnic no
My memory is pretty bad, but I seem to remember Wilkie could skate a bit before his knee injury. No hope after the injury.
You think i'm serious about this karma thing lol? Even if thats an ending year injury i'd do the trade 10/10. If next year he is injured again then i think it's a Tim Connoly 2.0I didn't do any of that but if karma was real, Chicago wouldn't have won 3 cups and been gifted Bedard after the disgusting shit they swept under the rug.
It's an unfortunate injury, that's it. No need for that esoteric nonsense.
Welcome to Montreal Celibrini/Eiserman
I was watching the play on loop earlier to try to figure out how it happened. Hard to tell if it’s the initial impact or when he extended his leg on the bench.
Eiserman maybe but when we pick if Celebrini is on the board i don't see how Kent Hughes would pass over himKnowing our luck those guys will have question marks around them and we draft someone else.
a defensemanKnowing our luck those guys will have question marks around them and we draft someone else.
The right call.
It’s unfortunate because I think that line Newhook/Dach/Slaf seemed to have another gear and I think they were all about to have career years.
The silver lining of course is this could very well lead us to Celebrini/Eiserman. That is not a bad thing.
The rebuild is still young so this isn't a setback for the team rebuild, hockey teams aren't defined by a single player despite what some people believe in here.Dang.
Major setback for our rebuild.
Ya I thought the same about Wright. Guy was praised nonstop about his leadership and maturity yet he had a meh season and just seemed like he didn't care enough which is why we picked Slaf. Michkov was seen as a slam dunk easy pick but then geopolitical concerns came up. A lot can change.Eiserman maybe but when we pick if Celebrini is on the board i don't see how Kent Hughes would pass over him
The rebuild is still young so this isn't a setback for the team rebuild, hockey teams aren't defined by a single player despite what some people believe in here.
It is a setback for Dach thought.
I tried to isolate the hit and put it on slo-mo.
I was watching the play on loop earlier to try to figure out how it happened. Hard to tell if it’s the initial impact or when he extended his leg on the bench.
Hughes's new timeframe for the end of the rebuild, i.e. when they will focus on winning over developing, start with Suzuki at 30 years old...They were counting on him being a core member as a top-6 center and he was starting to show he was there. If that doesn't pan out, yeah, it's a clear setback for a rebuild where you have to take a chance on a 18 year-old to do it, while your two best forwards are 25 and 23.
Hughes's new timeframe for the end of the rebuild, i.e. when they will focus on winning over developing, start with Suzuki at 30 years old...
That Tinordi pick is the gift that keeps on giving.
Hughes apparently said it (3-4 years from now) on French radio (see this post: HF Habs: - The official 2023-2024 tank thread)I don't know where he said but that's a joke if he did and I very much like the work he's done so far.
NHL teams are way too static.
That's not a real silver lining. This is a big setback for the rebuild if he doesn't come back tip-top and ready to go, full stop.
Yeah anything can happen but so far this year he has been has good as advertised.Ya I thought the same about Wright. Guy was praised nonstop about his leadership and maturity yet he had a meh season and just seemed like he didn't care enough which is why we picked Slaf. Michkov was seen as a slam dunk easy pick but then geopolitical concerns came up. A lot can change.