Kingston Frontenacs 2024-25 Season Thread, Part I

dirty12

Registered User
Mar 6, 2015
10,282
4,520
Why would Kingston not be able to decide between making a championship run next year via this year?

The fact that they traded away Thibodeau and Franca for picks should tell you they’re already made their decision.

A look at what Barrie, Brampton, and Niagara return compared to Kingston should tell you it will be no easier for Kingston next season. I think Brampton and Niagara should be better next season.
 

PuckLucker

Registered User
Feb 18, 2024
100
69
Let’s take a deeper look beyond just the number.

Ben Pickell was picked off the scrap heap this year and he won’t be missed in the slightest. A back up goalie like Vaccari is easily replaceable. Little Cal Uens also won’t be a significant loss.

Three of them will be back as OAs - - Soto and McGowan are near certainties to return and they’ll be very good OAs. Uronen still hasn’t been signed yet and I’d say it’s a 50/50 chance that he’s back as the third OA. Failing that, McNamara would be the third OA, but I’d look to move him this year because there’ll be better OAs available to be had next year.

That leaves three significant losses: Burns, Pieniniemi and Miedema.

Here’s the issue for Kingston - - none of those three compare to the level of Cal Ritchie, Easton Cowan, Carson Rehkopf, Denver Barkey or Oliver Bonk. They’re nowhere close to the talent that’s needed from 19yr olds on a championship contender.

This is one of those “difficult” decisions teams have to make between setting themselves up for sustained future success or wasting what they have by trying to make a delusional run.

Very similar to the decision London had to make with Robert Thomas. Obviously none of the aforementioned three are remotely comparable to Thomas, but dealing at least two of them would amount to a similar net return. London made the correct decision and that’s why they’re the CHL’s model franchise.
The delusional run already took place with the same staff and most of the core players last season when they added at the trade deadline and the team was in 7th place and chose not to move Ludwindski.
(BTW - Ludwinski has played 11 AHL games for Rockford and has 1 assist)

I agree with everything you are saying regarding the situation Kingston is in (minus Barkey being considered an elite 19 yo). 16 pts in 16 games with 9 pts being on the PP

I have a gut feeling that they will push and make additions for a couple of reasons:
- Roster is loaded with 19 yo
- Coach only trusts older players
- Available draft picks to use after moving Thibadeau & Frasca

Giving the A to #9 locks him in as an OA for this season and the Fronts staff will stay loyal. He stands to have more points this year then all 3 previous years combined from playing on a decent line.
My bet is they target an 18/19 year old Fwd that they know will be around both this year and next.
- Luchanko
- Romani
- Procyszyn
 

leafs4life94

Registered User
Jan 15, 2014
1,048
727
Let’s take a deeper look beyond just the number.

Ben Pickell was picked off the scrap heap this year and he won’t be missed in the slightest. A back up goalie like Vaccari is easily replaceable. Little Cal Uens also won’t be a significant loss.

Three of them will be back as OAs - - Soto and McGowan are near certainties to return and they’ll be very good OAs. Uronen still hasn’t been signed yet and I’d say it’s a 50/50 chance that he’s back as the third OA. Failing that, McNamara would be the third OA, but I’d look to move him this year because there’ll be better OAs available to be had next year.

That leaves three significant losses: Burns, Pieniniemi and Miedema.

Here’s the issue for Kingston - - none of those three compare to the level of Cal Ritchie, Easton Cowan, Carson Rehkopf, Denver Barkey or Oliver Bonk. They’re nowhere close to the talent that’s needed from 19yr olds on a championship contender.

This is one of those “difficult” decisions teams have to make between setting themselves up for sustained future success or wasting what they have by trying to make a delusional run.

Very similar to the decision London had to make with Robert Thomas. Obviously none of the aforementioned three are remotely comparable to Thomas, but dealing at least two of them would amount to a similar net return. London made the correct decision and that’s why they’re the CHL’s model franchise.
The issue is the sheer volume of players they have to replace. They'll be losing 3 D including their top 2, one if not both goalies (I wouldn't be surprised if they keep Vaccari around to start the year), and 5-6 of their top 9.

They have 3 '06s on the entire roster, with one being a 4th liner. They have 4 '07s on the roster, with only Hopkins being a true contributor. They have 4 signed '08 forwards who will be thrust into roles they may not be ready for. They'll have 2 1st rounders but you can't rely on 16 year olds to contribute.

Having 3 higher end OAs doesn't make up for the sheer lack of depth they'll have next year.

I don't see why Uronen would be back as an OA - why play for nothing here when he could go home and play pro. There's a much better chance Miedema is back.

Kingston going for it next year makes absolutely no sense, never has and never will.
 

frontsfan67

Registered User
Dec 3, 2022
3,065
1,764
WAY too early Fronts Projected roster 2025-2026


Forwards:

1
Battaglia | Hopkins | Soto OA

2
Buttar | Dervin*/Import | Kelly/Weir

3 Clark/Shewfelt | FRP/Import/McCuaig | Kelly/Weir

4 Shewfelt/Clark | FRP/Import/McQuaig | 2025 3rd rounder?

Defence:

1
McGowan OA | Williamson

2 Velliaris/Import | FRP/Moore

3 Schmidt/Velliaris/Import | FRP/Moore

Traded or gone from team- McNamara, Miedema(AHL or NCAA or Trade- don’t see him here next year), Uronen, Pieniniemi, Burns, Guindon, Uens, Lalonde, Heyes, Pickell

That is 10 (TEN) guys from the team this year. And to top it off- guys like Battaglia, Soto will get a lot of interest next year I am sure. So second half of the season we’re probably playing without those guys. Could also be playing without McGowan as some team may want him in their top 4 next year.

Dervin I think comes here next year. I think he gets drafted this year in the NHL and they tell him to come here for a year and get minutes on a depleted roster- playing every situation, before going NCAA in 2026/27

Also too hard to predict trades that we get here but I’d like to see Henry Mews here (but I don’t think it gets done)


Goalies

1- Vaccari OA (can’t leave Betts out to dry in his rookie season, have to give him SOME support)
2- Betts
 

ScoutLife4

Registered User
Nov 28, 2023
806
960
I'd personally consider anyone not signed or already an OA this season to be potentially here until they are not.
If you are going to leave an OA out for next season i'd make it UENS.
 

leafs4life94

Registered User
Jan 15, 2014
1,048
727
May have missed it being posted but looks like Manza got into some games with Chilliwack so it's probably safe to fully cross him off the unlikely list.
 

Donnie740

Registered User
May 28, 2021
1,776
2,493
The delusional run already took place with the same staff and most of the core players last season when they added at the trade deadline and the team was in 7th place and chose not to move Ludwindski.
(BTW - Ludwinski has played 11 AHL games for Rockford and has 1 assist)

I agree with everything you are saying regarding the situation Kingston is in (minus Barkey being considered an elite 19 yo). 16 pts in 16 games with 9 pts being on the PP


Last year, I was one of the only people imploring Kingston to trade Ludwinski. Ironically, I’m one of the only people pushing for Kingston to deal some of their 19yr olds.

Keeping Ludwinski around last year was a colossal mistake. Keeping all of their 19yr olds around will be a repeat.

There’s no question that Kingston has a good team this year - - but they’re not good enough to get past the great teams. Even if they trade away most of their top picks, there’s not enough high end talent available to match London, Oshawa or Barrie.

Trading Burns, Pieniniemi, Miedema and Uronen is going to get some excellent 2007 and 2008 players in addition to a ton of high draft picks.

Keep those four and Kingston MIGHT get to the conference finals this year and then be a complete dumpster fire for the next two years.

Trade those four to bring back young players like Parker Vaughan, Jack Nesbitt, Owen Griffin and Brooks Rogowski. Then with the slew of draft picks, bring in guys like Luca Romano and Beckett Sennecke next year.

And Kingston would STILL have additional top picks regaining for the 2026, 2027 and 2028 drafts. Not to mention the two 1st round picks they’ll have in the 2025 draft.

That’s how you build a sustainable championship contender.
 

Generalsupdates

@GeneralsUpdates on Twitter
Sep 4, 2017
7,603
4,812
Last year, I was one of the only people imploring Kingston to trade Ludwinski.
I think every single person I saw talk about KGN last year said this, and was shocked they instead decided to buy, including KGN fans.
Trading Burns, Pieniniemi, Miedema and Uronen is going to get some excellent 2007 and 2008 players in addition to a ton of high draft picks.
Can't see any of those players netting a 2008 born in return.
Trade those four to bring back young players like Parker Vaughan, Jack Nesbitt, Owen Griffin and Brooks Rogowski.
Can't see any of Vaughan, Nesbitt or Griffin being on the table for those unless you're packaging 2-3 of them together. Very few teams have open import spots so Pieniniemi and Uronen's value would be far lower than if they weren't an import. And Rogowski is physically not allowed to be traded this season as he's an '08 non 1st round pick
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad