- Mar 10, 2012
- 4,999
- 2,744
That would be offensive to the rest of the NHL GM'sI wonder if he dresses as a NHL gm for Halloween
There actually was a plan and it wasn't a bad one. Sign Reimer as backup to UPL while Levi continues to develop. The frustrating thing is he deviated from that plan.The Reimer saga has ended in farce. No plan was detected.
Rochester needs a good goalie too. They don’t have one. What’s his solution to that?There actually was a plan and it wasn't a bad one. Sign Reimer as backup to UPL while Levi continues to develop. The frustrating thing is he deviated from that plan.
It only is a problem if it becomes a problem But, if one of those 2 get hurt or under perform we currently have no NHL ready option to call upon.
That would be offensive to the rest of the NHL GM's
So…. Fire him 3 games into the season?
If we go 0-5 to start the year, he's gotta go
Karmanos for nowI want him gone as much as the next guy, but who are you replacing him with at this point of the year?
And it wouldn’t make a difference. Whoever takes the job would have to convince TPegs that a five year plan he blessed was folly. Would TPegs allow the new guy to trade those players “who want to be here” for guys that want to win? Doubtful. Would TPegs allow the new guy to hire a new coach and let that coach hire his own staff? Highly doubtful. And lastly, assuming you could find a trade partner it is likely that the player(s) sought would nix any deal via NTC. The organic model was folly from the start and now is the only viable path going forward. It will take extreme luck and a lot of time for this group to luck in to the post season and even then it will be fleeting.I want him gone as much as the next guy, but who are you replacing him with at this point of the year?