Off Sides
Registered User
- Sep 8, 2008
- 9,755
- 5,585
The UFA thing was just about teams being interested in acquiring them at their salary and term. Their NMC/NTCs are a whole separate problem, so this discussion is really being made with the assumption that either would be willing to accept a move to a non-basement dweller.
I hear you, just pointing out it's not really a direct comparison.
I think possibly in their last contract year, they may be movable, prior to that without the Rangers taking back something negative or attaching something positive, I'm not sure I see it even with retention once the clauses are accounted for.