OswaldBates
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2019
- 1,059
- 421
sorry keeping posting the guy who was a HUGE Bylsma backer really doesn't move the needle
I don't think you should be volleying shots at the messenger when you hear something about a player you don't like. It's never a good idea to be "besmirching" a player in your organization. That's never good for anyone. We see that from time to time around the league and while it's fun to watch from the sidelines, you don't want to be reading that inside your own organization. If he didn't get invited over, there could very well be a reason for it. Just because you like Hallander (and don't get me wrong, I did too) doesn't mean you can assign malice any time a journo or scout says there's an issue with the kid.
Say he didn't get traded and he stays in Sweden and it comes out that he didn't get invited over here because of his skating and the org's general belief that he wouldn't make the NHL. Would that make it better or worse?
we already lack shooting talent in the top 6...I would have liked a much better goal scorer for that price...
OK how bout trading ffor a guy they have never ever seen before? would that be better ?Can we stop trading for players based on familiarity? Who are we getting back next, Deryk Engelland? Kapanen isn't bad, mind you, but maybe we need to broaden our horizons a bit and stop focusing on players drafted by us or by JR when he was in Carolina.
& I think the Pens Scouts saw him a lot more than Jesse did too SO I think give some weight to their opinion or NO?
Yes, because the alternative of being the Minnesota Wild is so much better than bottoming out and hoping you get high draft picks.
Face it, the right way to prioritize this team is to go all-in now and them bottom out after Crosby and Malkin retire. This team isn't winning a damn thing after Crosby and Malkin leave, trying to plan for the future when the best case scenario for the future is "painful mediocrity" doesn't make any sense.
I'm feeling the same way about just leaning entirely on points at the expense of absolutely everything else.One thing I've learned from hockey fans is that I'm becoming more and more anti-analytics because of how many people I see misusing analytics in my opinion![]()
OH sure you keep that opinion chiefThis has nothing to do with the Pens scouts.
Rutherford doesn't require their stamp of approval before making a dumb decision, which he's proving quite adept at lately.
It has been repeatedly shown that a player's prime is actually when they're around 23.
I hate this trade from an analytical perspective (obviously), but I don't like the "eye test" fit either. Kapanen is speedy and has an above-average shot, but he is dumb as bricks. He hands and brain just cannot keep up with his feet, and it's gonna drive Sid absolutely nuts if they play together.
It's entertaining watching Empoleon talk himself into this trade in real time during the course of this thread.
You're absolutely right, this team isn't winning anything after Crosby and Malkin retire because we've traded our past 3 first round picks, soon to be 4.
There has to be a point where you have to consider a rebuild. If this was 3 years ago, I'd be fine with it. You don't go all-in when your chances of winning are dwindling every year to be left with nothing but dirt. It's not the worst trade ever, it's not an absolute franchise killer, it's just dumb. It's piling on what is already a mismanagement of assets to try and go "all-in" every year only to get raw-dogged in the first round. I absolutely hope I'm wrong, but I think this is going to be a trade we're talking about a lot in 5 years.
OH sure you keep that opinion chief
Tbf, they wanted Bjugstad to play top 6 RW and McCann to LW - and we also thought we were losing a forward last summer.
Top 10 PK last year.
Nah. 50-50 on the player become as good or better, and most of those guys are in the NHL by D+2.
I feel like the only way this deal can be fine is if Lindgren is better than what I'm expecting from him. To me, he doesn't seem like much. But if he's a good RD prospect, I can stomach this deal. It's a little overpayment from JR if Lindgren is a good prospect.
One thing I've learned from hockey fans is that I'm becoming more and more anti-analytics because of how many people I see misusing analytics in my opinion
If a good, but flawed, tool is used while people aren't acknowledging the flaws, that just makes the tool substantially less good.
It's entertaining watching Empoleon talk himself into this trade in real time during the course of this thread.
And out of Rodrigues being an asset of any consequence, apparently.
think that Mario, Burkle & Morehouse Said to JR Ahhh f*** it do whatever you wantThank u for ur blessing
Nope. Kappy's big issue is he lacks finish.
Hagelin put up 15+ goals early on in his career too.
Honestly this makes the Kahun trade even dumber, too. Unless I'm missing something?
Kap is a better player than Kahun but like... by how much? Seems like you just kinda shat a bunch of assets only to end up a half a foot further along than you started.