I think people (not Leaf fans) are afraid of the idea of a part of the Kessel trade (Kap) becoming good. Kap has looked solid so far this preseason, i'm willing to let him progress.
Not knocking the kid, but I don't think Kapanen has more of a shot at cracking the Panthers lineup than he does the Leafs. Best off holding onto him. He's the kind of skilled prospect that just needs to be given a bit more time to develop.
You've literally gotta be kidding me. Why do leaf fans, and I mean only leaf fans of all the teams in the league, vastly overrate certain players? Sorry but no GM in history of the game would trade a 1st for Kapanen.
E.g. Kapanen is an elite A+ prospect, Jake Gardiner is an absolute surefire top-4 defender with huge upside and he isn't -50 every season (just pretend).
Kapanen could be the new JVR Ina couple years
You've literally gotta be kidding me. Why do leaf fans, and I mean only leaf fans of all the teams in the league, vastly overrate certain players? Sorry but no GM in history of the game would trade a 1st for Kapanen.
E.g. Kapanen is an elite A+ prospect, Jake Gardiner is an absolute surefire top-4 defender with huge upside and he isn't -50 every season (just pretend).
You clearly have something against him. Kapanen was a 22 overall pick, Rantanen went 10th overall in a stacked draft. Why are you comparing them in the first place? Is there something written in the GM handbook that says in order to be worth a first round pick, you have to be as good as Rantanen?
If you take Kapanen's season last year with an unbiased approach, you'd see that for a 19 year old underager in the AHL, he did very well. If you try to make some nonsensical conclusion that the only way for Kapanen to be successful is to be Rantanen then you're just making ridiculous expectations.
This is probably the most ridiculous thing I have ever read about a prospect on this site.
People seem to read into posts whatever way they see most fit. Throwing out an example doesn't equal to comparing prospects, jeez.
Now as for Kapanen, I don't see him as the type of a player that would be an ideal bottom six guy. He's not going to beat guys with his physicality and he doesn't even usually seem willing to put himself out there (which is maybe wise if you want to avoid injuries). Now if he doesn't break into top 6 role looking down the future, what kind of value does he hold? Aside from that, I haven't seen any hint of that "warrior spirit" his father used to have, doing everything for the team and being great all around player. Nor has there been any noticeable improvement with him these past years. If we ignore the sad overall performances in the WJCs and take a look at his numbers in FEL/AHL (there really aren't much difference between the level of these leagues), the scoring seems rather linear which either might not mean much or just isn't a great sign. Now am I saying he's a bust? No, but the chances are there for sure. The kid has the boom or bust label written all over. Do I hope for the latter? Definitely not.
Now why would I have agenda against him? While Finland may be producing more top end talent than ever, that doesn't mean everyone of those guys are going to pan out. Every piece counts, even Kapanen. If you look into my earlier posts about the kid, you can find similar observations.
Ha sure, Kasperi is still only 20 years old and there's time. However, as I explained before, his development has left a lot to be desired. A kid who shies away from contact being 19 year old in the WJC doesn't really light it up for me. There's no room for fear in the NHL. I'm not going to even bother with the questions around his hockey IQ. At this point of time there's definitely not enough showings to still throw a first rounder for him, whether you may like it or not.
uhhh....the leafs arent trying to move him. also, you arent a gm and have no idea of the market for such a player.
swing and a miss
Classic HF overvaluation of the almighty 1st round pick.
The heck are you even talking about? #20-#30 OA's average expectation is that they never even make the NHL in any capacity, not being a replacement for a first ballot HoFer. if Kapanen is 3 years ahead in development as well as looking like he has some legitimate bottom 6 potential, it's a no brainer.
I'm someone who has been rather disappointed in Kapanen, especially his decisionmaking. But he has some legitimate tools and he easily is more valuable than a late first round selection.
But the 1st round pick could be anything? Anything!
It could even be Kapanen. That would be good. I like Kapanen. If I could trade Kappy for a Kappy, I'd be pretty happy!
Yet there are teams like the Wings who can find valuable assets no matter how low they are drafting. There's absolutely nothing aside from great skating and good hands in Kapanen that would make him a future NHL player. In most cases even these assets are not enough, especially if you are below average in size/height. Earlier I said I'd rather roll the dice again, but in reality drafting has little to do with lottery (in case someone took it seriously) if your scouting staff is good enough. Right now this kid doesn't look like a future NHL player to me, hence not worth of a first rounder. Feel free to disagree.
And you know what's better than a Kappy? A Kappy with two years less positive development and the added risk of busting outright and never being worth signing to an ELC, that gets us a compensation pick!
Jakub Kindl and Brendan Smith were both drafted with late 1st round picks and ended up being extremely underwhelming. Even the best drafting teams miss often in the 20-40 range.
You are grossly overstating the value of a late 1st round pick, you are lucky if that pick ever turns into more than a 3rd line player. I would consider doing a 1st for Kapanen as a Hawks fan.
Edit: I also remember Kapanen being out on the ice frequently for the Finns while holding onto the lead in the dying seconds. Your coach didn't seem to think of him as a player who only has a limited skill set.
Yet there are teams like the Wings who can find valuable assets no matter how low they are drafting. There's absolutely nothing aside from great skating and good hands in Kapanen that would make him a future NHL player. In most cases even these assets are not enough, especially if you are below average in size/height. Earlier I said I'd rather roll the dice again, but in reality drafting has little to do with lottery (in case someone took it seriously) if your scouting staff is good enough. Right now this kid doesn't look like a future NHL player to me, hence not worth of a first rounder. Feel free to disagree.