In some cases, rentals make sense. The Kane and Tank moves were fine and correct; I blame Gallant more.
Tarasenko move 100% made sense. Kane move only made sense if Kane was going to be depth at even strength and QB PP2.
Their usage was what made the least sense, and as someone who was done with Gallant for his "lines" last year as well as his tactics, style, and who he blamed when things went bad, I largely agree he was a problem.
Tarasenko unfortunately couldn't be fit under the cap, but there's still a need for a player like him on this team. A wing who can really shoot the puck. This team doesn't have anybody like that currently and I think the hope was that Kakko could turn into that sort of player, but it hasn't happened. Wheeler has really been a non-factor. Really disappointed in his play so far. Unfortunately, he completes a couple nice passes, or takes a few shots that are tricky saves, and people seem to want to declare it a "good game." He's two years removed from a near PPG pace and coming off a 60 point season, and he's pacing for...21 points...while playing with two 35 goal scorers. That's abysmal.
In a perfect world, we would have kept Tarasenko and not needed Wheeler, then walked away from Kane.
They've gotten off to a strong start, and with the emergence of Lafreniere and Trocheck really stepping it up, have been much better than I thought they'd be at this point, but top contenders will add on at the deadline, and it's naive to think the Rangers won't need to also.