Hunter Gathers
The Crown
Hahhaha! I’m always lurking. Can’t fully keep away from this place lol
At some point, it would be fun to get all of the pre-9/11 HFNYR guys together for a reunion.
Maybe we can even find Pasha.
Hahhaha! I’m always lurking. Can’t fully keep away from this place lol
This is the definition of an “emotional decision “Excuses it's a shot at you, it's just in general. There's always something: linemates, deployment, pp time, a snow storm, someone didn't score on kakko's only good pass in 3 games, it's too sunny, whatever.
I'm not suggesting an emotional decision, I'm saying that he has no role here and none evolving. He was benched again in the playoffs. This is three coaches for him that we see the same player and lack of skill.
The issue before then is the team will want to sign him for show me or term at cheap. Kakko is going to want a raise or a term raise so he doesn't get underpaid if he starts producing. This will possibly cause an issue getting a contract done. I will be shocked if he resigns here bc he knows that kreider zib and kakko don't work together so he will be stuffed on the 3rd line again and producing nothing again. So the team won't want to trade him for pennies on the dollar and kakko won't want that role again. It points to an offer sheet.
I said around the deadline that NYR should look to the ducks about a deal of kakko for one of their young d. We could use a d man in the pipeline and the ducks add a young dirty work player to join their young skill.
This is the definition of an “emotional decision “
You don’t like “this bum” on your team and so you want to move him for peanuts.
Also zero coaches benched him for “lack of skill” every coach has talked about his skill as a positive.
Lavi said specifically at breakup, his goal next season is to get Kakko to take a big step, and did call it a failure on his part.
Kakko as he is now, is still a value contract under 5m for a long term deal. Due to just his defense and the little offense he’s actually contributing.
But you want to move him for a mystery box just to get rid of him.
And I love it when people make wild accusations without any proof at all.I love it when people just blindly buy into coach speak.
"Yeah, I expected Lavi to say 'That Kakko kid sucks ass! He's a bum!' But boy did he surprise me."
I get you, and I have no need to hang onto Kakko. But he is an asset and letting him go for less than he's worth, just to be rid of him would be, IMO of course, a bad idea. If they can use his value to upgrade the D, or any other area, I'm all for it. Will depend on the deal.Excuses it's a shot at you, it's just in general. There's always something: linemates, deployment, pp time, a snow storm, someone didn't score on kakko's only good pass in 3 games, it's too sunny, whatever.
I'm not suggesting an emotional decision, I'm saying that he has no role here and none evolving. He was benched again in the playoffs. This is three coaches for him that we see the same player and lack of skill.
The issue before then is the team will want to sign him for show me or term at cheap. Kakko is going to want a raise or a term raise so he doesn't get underpaid if he starts producing. This will possibly cause an issue getting a contract done. I will be shocked if he resigns here bc he knows that kreider zib and kakko don't work together so he will be stuffed on the 3rd line again and producing nothing again. So the team won't want to trade him for pennies on the dollar and kakko won't want that role again. It points to an offer sheet.
I said around the deadline that NYR should look to the ducks about a deal of kakko for one of their young d. We could use a d man in the pipeline and the ducks add a young dirty work player to join their young skill.
According to Lafs interview. They really focused more on it last year. Like laf really understood that his skating was holding him back and he greatly increased his leg muscles by 30%.Laf was working hard on his skating EVERY off season with the same trainer (according to the TRAINER)... sometimes it takes a while, and some confidence, to show.
The interview I saw with the trainer said he made bigger gains this past offseason, but that he worked hard at it every year. I think he said something about physical maturity.According to Lafs interview. They really focused more on it last year. Like laf really understood that his skating was holding him back and he greatly increased his leg muscles.
Do u really think kakko doesnt practice skating? Sometimes it has to click in the player.
Hopefully it clicks in Kakko this offseason
Kakko was rushed into the league. Hintz, Rantanen, Aho weren't.Yeah, even if you look at all the best Finnish forwards playing right now, think Rantanen, Barkov, Hintz, Aho and/or just high Finnish draft picks like Laine, Kotkaniemi, and Puljujarvi, none had a PPG in Liiga in their draft year. That's not the problem/indicator of anything.
In retrospect, Kakko should've been sent down to Harward when it was an obvious that he was struggling, and that was an option. Laf didn't have that option, it was QMJHL or the NHL (or loan him to some European club).Kakko was rushed into the league. Hintz, Rantanen, Aho weren't.
Yep, in retrospect, he was woefully prepared for the NHL in his rookie season. Point being, not being a PPG at TPS isn't why Kakko doesn't have a "nose for the net"Kakko was rushed into the league. Hintz, Rantanen, Aho weren't.
There was also an assumption that Kakko had a super short off season since his draft year went very long with a worlds appearance.In retrospect, Kakko should've been sent down to Harward when it was an obvious that he was struggling, and that was an option. Laf didn't have that option, it was QMJHL or the NHL (or loan him to some European club).
Still overall, he was awful that first year. Marginally better but still scuffling the next two.There was also an assumption that Kakko had a super short off season since his draft year went very long with a worlds appearance.
The COVID bubble he was one of the few positive players against Carolina.
I’ve been saying this. If he learns how to hit hard on the forecheck and just drive to the net and cause chaos he would be a great top 6 player.Wrong. He's a high skill player with a good head on his shoulders, that is likely to continue to grow and adapt. He is also a prototypical power forward, they tend to prime later in their careers.
The gap between year 1-2 was huge.Still overall, he was awful that first year. Marginally better but still scuffling the next two.
I mean, yeah you can say it was huge but that's only because he was 4th line level player bad that first year. Last year was really where his production made a jump to middle six standards, which is what makes this year's regression so disappointing.The gap between year 1-2 was huge.
He’s improved nearly every year.
Sure. But I also don’t see him done growing.I mean, yeah you can say it was huge but that's only because he was 4th line level player bad that first year. Last year was really where his production made a jump to middle six standards, which is what makes this year's regression so disappointing.
That's ultimately the hard part about it though. You gotta get results.Sure. But I also don’t see him done growing.
This wasn’t him showing up to camp out of shape. Or having a negative attitude.
His play at the start of the year was great, just almost no results to show. He played like a legit top line forward for the first 9 games.
I agree on the results. Even Kakko agreed.That's ultimately the hard part about it though. You gotta get results.
I like Kakko and if he could just figure it out he could be a huge part of this team's future but when he plays well things just don't go in for him, then he loses confidence, then he looks lost and useless, then we all hate him.
Confidence is a huge part of making a player look fast but Kakko still absolutely has to improve his first step explosiveness and then use it to beat some players. Start doing something with the puck instead of racing back and forth along the boards. Cut hard and then explode towards the net, if nothing else it'll draw the defense out of position.
Of course I'm some dumb dipshit on the Internet saying this but hey, something isn't clicking for him and he's gotta figure out how to be an effective player and how he's gonna play and how to get there. I feel like ultimately he's a guy who needs the right linemates and so far he just hasn't had those, but maybe then that's also part of the problem.
Any way it goes I think Drury will eye him as a piece that might go in a trade to better the team but if not I would be the coaching staff has some plans for him to work on and as Lavy said try to draw out more success
Just note, I'm not disagreeing with you here. Obviously, I'm not going to be definitive on it and how Kakko is gonna progress to some great player but this is a place where the GM has to really be careful, read the player, decide what he can get out of the player going forward or make a shrewd hockey trade and get something of real value for the player in a trade.Sure. But I also don’t see him done growing.
Miller was already a better player though...we could see the skill with Miller and the results, he just was a bit inconsistent in it all and had the "lacks maturity" tagI agree on the results. Even Kakko agreed.
He did point out if he was better it wouldn’t have mattered how the rest of his line played.
He’s not doing taking steps forward and this is gonna look like the miller to Tampa trade.
We get nothing, and then a few years later he’s exploded, on a reasonable deal and we’re screwed and look like idiots
I thought this was obvious in season 1. As well as EVERY SINGLE TIME he was coming back from an injury.In retrospect, Kakko should've been sent down to Harward when it was an obvious that he was struggling, and that was an option. Laf didn't have that option, it was QMJHL or the NHL (or loan him to some European club).
Miller was already a better player though...we could see the skill with Miller and the results, he just was a bit inconsistent in it all and had the "lacks maturity" tag
With Kakko we haven't quite seeen as much as we did with Miller
sure, thats a valid question to ask. Can he take this and use it.Just note, I'm not disagreeing with you here. Obviously, I'm not going to be definitive on it and how Kakko is gonna progress to some great player but this is a place where the GM has to really be careful, read the player, decide what he can get out of the player going forward or make a shrewd hockey trade and get something of real value for the player in a trade.
This.Forget about the rumors of him going first overall but he was a pretty consensus #2 pick, #3 is where it got interesting.
And I love it when people make wild accusations without any proof at all.
If the only thing we have is stats, advanced stats, and eye test, and coach speak, then that’s what we get to use.
We don’t get to claim “3 coaches benched him due to a lack of talent” without evidence
Miller was already a better player though...we could see the skill with Miller and the results, he just was a bit inconsistent in it all and had the "lacks maturity" tag
With Kakko we haven't quite seeen as much as we did with Miller