This is such a bullshit argument because you're basically saying we can never criticize anything an NHL head coach does unless we were an NHL head coach ourselves.
With that logic, what's the purpose of having HF Boards?
Apparently? Your argument is that it’s only to criticize, as if you can’t discuss hockey in any other manner. Apparently we’re also “pretending” every coach gets nominated for multiple Jack Adams by accident. Like Petr Mrazek just accidentally getting multiple Vezina nominations. Definitely.
My argument clearly states I don’t always agree with coaches. The fact remains, we don’t know why Kakko is scratched. It’s entirely possible the coaching staff has repeatedly shown him tape and asked him to do something that he cannot/will not do. People are acting like we’re scratching a 70 point player because of where he was drafted. If he was the 90th overall pick no one would give a shit and people would firmly believe this is a furure third liner.
I qualified my own feelings about NHL coaches and GMs a half dozen times in my post. I just don’t have the arrogance to believe I *definitely* know better because people like shit I post online, even though I *feel* like I know better.
I’m in the camp that Kakko should be playing. I’m also aware that, passionate though I am, I actually don’t know shit.